Literature DB >> 11520776

The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial.

D Grimwade1, H Walker, G Harrison, F Oliver, S Chatters, C J Harrison, K Wheatley, A K Burnett, A H Goldstone.   

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults carries a poor prognosis, and the optimum treatment remains to be determined. In younger patients, treatment stratification is frequently based upon diagnostic karyotype, which was the most important prognostic factor in the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) AML10 trial. Considered here is whether karyotype is also predictive in older adults; this is done by studying 1065 cases from MRC AML11 (median age, 66 years). Three prognostic groups were distinguished on the basis of response to induction therapy and overall survival (OS). Those with t(15;17), t(8;21), or inv(16) composed the favorable risk group. Overall, these abnormalities predicted a superior complete remission (CR) rate (72%), reflecting relatively low levels of resistant disease (RD) (8%), and lower relapse risk (RR) (56%) associated with superior OS (34% at 5 years). Normal karyotype (CR, 63%; RD, 17%; RR, 78%; OS, 15%) and other noncomplex abnormalities (CR, 53%; RD, 32%; RR, 85%; OS, 10%) composed the intermediate group; while complex karyotype predicted an extremely poor prognosis (CR, 26%; RD, 56%; RR, 91%; OS, 2%). Combining MRC AML10 and AML11 (n = 2677) revealed that the most favorable changes were rarer in older patients (younger than 55 years, 24%; 55 years or older, 7%), while complex abnormalities were more common (6% vs 13%). This study suggests that hierarchical cytogenetic classification identifies biologically distinct subsets of AML that are represented in all age groups. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of karyotype as a critical independent determinant of outcome in older patients with AML, providing a potential framework for stratified treatment approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11520776     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  206 in total

1.  Report of a phase II study of clofarabine and cytarabine in de novo and relapsed and refractory AML patients and in selected elderly patients at high risk for anthracycline toxicity.

Authors:  Edward Agura; Barry Cooper; Houston Holmes; Estil Vance; Robert Brian Berryman; Christopher Maisel; Sandy Li; Giovanna Saracino; Mirjana Tadic-Ovcina; Joseph Fay
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-27

2.  Different impact of intermediate and unfavourable cytogenetics at the time of diagnosis on outcome of de novo AML after allo-SCT: a long-term retrospective analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  H Nahi; M Remberger; M Machaczka; J Ungerstedt; J Mattson; O Ringden; Katarina Le-Blanc; P Ljungman; H Hägglund
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Betul Oran; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Identification of therapeutic targets for quiescent, chemotherapy-resistant human leukemia stem cells.

Authors:  Yoriko Saito; Hiroshi Kitamura; Atsushi Hijikata; Mariko Tomizawa-Murasawa; Satoshi Tanaka; Shinsuke Takagi; Naoyuki Uchida; Nahoko Suzuki; Akiko Sone; Yuho Najima; Hidetoshi Ozawa; Atsushi Wake; Shuichi Taniguchi; Leonard D Shultz; Osamu Ohara; Fumihiko Ishikawa
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Prognostic factors for intensive care unit admission, intensive care outcome, and post-intensive care survival in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Thomas Staudinger; Michael Kundi; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Andja Bojic; Oliver Robak; Valentin Fuhrmann; Ulrich Jäger; Peter Valent; Wolfgang R Sperr
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Acquired genomic copy number aberrations and survival in adult acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Brian Parkin; Harry Erba; Peter Ouillette; Diane Roulston; Anjali Purkayastha; Judith Karp; Moshe Talpaz; Lisa Kujawski; Sajid Shakhan; Cheng Li; Kerby Shedden; Sami N Malek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Flexible low-intensity combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, phase II study.

Authors:  Arumugam Manoharan; John Reynolds; Jane Matthews; Heather Baxter; Juliana Di Iulio; Michael Leahy; Surender Juneja
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Richard Stone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Survival differences in childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia: A cross-national study using US and England data.

Authors:  Sherlly Xie; Md Jobayer Hossain
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  BH3 profiling discriminates response to cytarabine-based treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  William E Pierceall; Steven M Kornblau; Nicole E Carlson; Xuelin Huang; Noel Blake; Ryan Lena; Michael Elashoff; Marina Konopleva; Michael H Cardone; Michael Andreeff
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.