Literature DB >> 21282541

First-in-man study of CPX-351: a liposomal carrier containing cytarabine and daunorubicin in a fixed 5:1 molar ratio for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Eric J Feldman1, Jeffrey E Lancet, Jonathan E Kolitz, Ellen K Ritchie, Gail J Roboz, Alan F List, Steven L Allen, Ekatherine Asatiani, Lawrence D Mayer, Christine Swenson, Arthur C Louie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase I dose-escalation trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of CPX-351. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPX-351 induction was administered on days 1, 3, and 5 by 90-minute infusion to 48 relapsed or refractory patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplasia. Doses started at 3 units/m(2) with dose doublings in single-patient cohorts until a pharmacodynamic effect (treatment-related adverse events or reduction in bone marrow cellularity or blast count) was observed, followed by 33% escalations in three patient cohorts until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred.
RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose was 101 units/m(2). DLTs consisted of hypertensive crisis, congestive heart failure, and prolonged cytopenias. Adverse events were consistent with cytarabine and daunorubicin treatment. Response occurred at doses as low as 32 units/m(2). Of 43 patients with AML, nine had complete response (CR) and one had CR with incomplete platelet recovery; of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, one of three had CR. Eight CRs were achieved among the 31 patients with prior cytarabine and daunorubicin treatment. CR in AML occurred in five of 26 patients age ≥ 60 years and in five of 17 patients younger than age 60 years. Median half-life was 31.1 hours (cytarabine) and 21.9 hours (daunorubicin), with both drugs and their metabolites detectable > 7 days after the last dose. The targeted 5:1 molar ratio was maintained at all dose levels for up to 24 hours.
CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of CPX-351 for phase II study is 101 units/m(2). Further exploration of efficacy and safety is ongoing in phase II trials in newly diagnosed and first-relapse patients with AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282541      PMCID: PMC4520927          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

1.  Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Lawrence D Mayer; Troy O Harasym; Paul G Tardi; Natashia L Harasym; Clifford R Shew; Sharon A Johnstone; Euan C Ramsay; Marcel B Bally; Andrew S Janoff
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  In vivo maintenance of synergistic cytarabine:daunorubicin ratios greatly enhances therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Paul Tardi; Sharon Johnstone; Natashia Harasym; Sherwin Xie; Troy Harasym; Natalia Zisman; Pierrot Harvie; David Bermudes; Lawrence Mayer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Comparative pharmacokinetic study of idarubicin and daunorubicin in leukemia patients.

Authors:  J Robert; F Rigal-Huguet; P Hurteloup
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.271

4.  Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of CPX-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine:daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts.

Authors:  Wah-Seng Lim; Paul G Tardi; Nancy Dos Santos; Xiaowei Xie; Mannie Fan; Barry D Liboiron; Xiaoping Huang; Troy O Harasym; David Bermudes; Lawrence D Mayer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bob Löwenberg; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Wim van Putten; Harry C Schouten; Carlos Graux; Augustin Ferrant; Pieter Sonneveld; Johan Maertens; Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Bart J Biemond; Edo Vellenga; Marinus van Marwijk Kooy; Leo F Verdonck; Joachim Beck; Hartmut Döhner; Alois Gratwohl; Thomas Pabst; Gregor Verhoef
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Application of theoretical models to chemotherapy protocol design.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

8.  Clinical pharmacology of cytarabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Authors:  R A Fleming; R L Capizzi; G L Rosner; L K Oliver; S J Smith; C A Schiffer; R T Silver; B A Peterson; R B Weiss; G A Omura
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

  8 in total
  91 in total

1.  Phase 2 trial of CPX-351, a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine/daunorubicin, vs cytarabine/daunorubicin in older adults with untreated AML.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Lancet; Jorge E Cortes; Donna E Hogge; Martin S Tallman; Tibor J Kovacsovics; Lloyd E Damon; Rami Komrokji; Scott R Solomon; Jonathan E Kolitz; Maureen Cooper; Andrew M Yeager; Arthur C Louie; Eric J Feldman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Watching the gorilla and questioning delivery dogma.

Authors:  Thomas J Anchordoquy; Dmitri Simberg
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.

Authors:  Susanne K Golombek; Jan-Niklas May; Benjamin Theek; Lia Appold; Natascha Drude; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Christine M McMahon; Alexander E Perl
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 5.  Novel Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are We Finally Breaking the Deadlock?

Authors:  Maximilian Stahl; Benjamin Y Lu; Tae Kon Kim; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 6.  Novel therapeutics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kendra Sweet; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Novel drugs for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  G Montalban-Bravo; G Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Nanomedicine in the application of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Shuo You; Jing Luo; Hans E Grossniklaus; Ma-Ling Gou; Ke Meng; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Materials innovation for co-delivery of diverse therapeutic cargos.

Authors:  Megan E Godsey; Smruthi Suryaprakash; Kam W Leong
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 10.  Novel agents in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alexander Ungewickell; Bruno C Medeiros
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.