Danna A Slusky1, Monique Does2, Catherine Metayer2, Gabor Mezei3, Steve Selvin2, Patricia A Buffler2. 1. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States. Electronic address: dannaaharon@gmail.com. 2. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States. 3. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Data from the Northern California Childhood Leukemia Study (NCCLS) were used to assess whether selection bias may explain the association between residential magnetic fields (assessed by wire codes) and childhood leukemia as previously observed in case-control studies. METHODS: Wiring codes were calculated for participating cases, n=310; and non-participating cases, n=66; as well as for three control groups: first-choice participating, n=174; first-choice non-participating, n=252; and replacement (non-first choice participating controls), n=220. RESULTS: Participating controls tended to be of higher socioeconomic status than non-participating controls, and lower socioeconomic status was related to higher wire-codes. The odds ratio (OR) for developing childhood leukemia associated with high wire-codes was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.64) when all cases were compared to all first-choice controls (participating and non-participating). The OR for developing childhood leukemia in the high current category was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.26) when participating cases were compared to first-choice participating controls, but no associations were observed when participating cases were compared to non-participating controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.57) or to replacement controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.60). CONCLUSIONS: The observed risk estimates vary by type of control group, and no statistically significant association between wire codes and childhood leukemia is observed in the California population participating in the NCCLS.
PURPOSE: Data from the Northern California Childhood Leukemia Study (NCCLS) were used to assess whether selection bias may explain the association between residential magnetic fields (assessed by wire codes) and childhood leukemia as previously observed in case-control studies. METHODS: Wiring codes were calculated for participating cases, n=310; and non-participating cases, n=66; as well as for three control groups: first-choice participating, n=174; first-choice non-participating, n=252; and replacement (non-first choice participating controls), n=220. RESULTS: Participating controls tended to be of higher socioeconomic status than non-participating controls, and lower socioeconomic status was related to higher wire-codes. The odds ratio (OR) for developing childhood leukemia associated with high wire-codes was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.64) when all cases were compared to all first-choice controls (participating and non-participating). The OR for developing childhood leukemia in the high current category was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.26) when participating cases were compared to first-choice participating controls, but no associations were observed when participating cases were compared to non-participating controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.57) or to replacement controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.60). CONCLUSIONS: The observed risk estimates vary by type of control group, and no statistically significant association between wire codes and childhood leukemia is observed in the California population participating in the NCCLS.
Authors: Danna A Slusky; Catherine Metayer; Melinda C Aldrich; Mary H Ward; C Suzanne Lea; Steve Selvin; Patricia A Buffler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: A Ahlbom; N Day; M Feychting; E Roman; J Skinner; J Dockerty; M Linet; M McBride; J Michaelis; J H Olsen; T Tynes; P K Verkasalo Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Joseph L Wiemels; Amanda W Singer; Mark D Miller Journal: Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care Date: 2016-10
Authors: Alberto Salvan; Alessandra Ranucci; Susanna Lagorio; Corrado Magnani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Aryana T Amoon; Catherine M Crespi; Anders Ahlbom; Megha Bhatnagar; Isabelle Bray; Kathryn J Bunch; Jacqueline Clavel; Maria Feychting; Denis Hémon; Christoffer Johansen; Christian Kreis; Carlotta Malagoli; Fabienne Marquant; Camilla Pedersen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Martin Röösli; Ben D Spycher; Madhuri Sudan; John Swanson; Andrea Tittarelli; Deirdre M Tuck; Tore Tynes; Ximena Vergara; Marco Vinceti; Victor Wünsch-Filho; Leeka Kheifets Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 7.640