Literature DB >> 3164167

Case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields.

D A Savitz1, H Wachtel, F A Barnes, E M John, J G Tvrdik.   

Abstract

Concern with health effects of extremely low frequency magnetic fields has been raised by epidemiologic studies of childhood cancer in relation to proximity to electric power distribution lines. This case-control study was designed to assess the relation between residential exposure to magnetic fields and the development of childhood cancer. Eligible cases consisted of all 356 residents of the five-county 1970 Denver, Colorado Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area aged 0-14 years who were diagnosed with any form of cancer between 1976 and 1983. Controls were selected by random digit dialing to approximate the case distribution by age, sex, and telephone exchange area. Exposure was characterized through in-home electric and magnetic field measurements under low and high power use conditions and wire configuration codes, a surrogate measure of long-term magnetic field levels. Measured magnetic fields under low power use conditions had a modest association with cancer incidence; a cutoff score of 2.0 milligauss resulted in an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-2.9) for total cancers and somewhat larger odds ratios (ORs) for leukemias (OR = 1.9), lymphomas (OR = 2.2), and soft tissue sarcomas (OR = 3.3). Neither magnetic fields (OR = 1.0) nor electric fields (OR = 0.9) under high power use conditions were related to total cancers. Wire codes associated with higher magnetic fields were more common among case than control homes. The odds ratio to contrast very high and high to very low, low, and buried wire codes was 1.5 (95% CI = 1.0-2.3) for total cases, with consistency across cancer subgroups except for brain cancer (OR = 2.0) and lymphomas (OR = 0.8). Contrasts of very high to buried wire code homes produced larger, less precise odds ratios of 2.3 for total cases, 2.9 for leukemias, and 3.3 for lymphomas. Adjusted estimates for measured fields and wire codes did not differ from crude results, indicating an absence of confounding. Limitations to the study are nonresponse (especially for field measurements), differential mobility of cases and controls, and a presumably nondifferential exposure misclassification from the use of imperfect surrogates for long-term magnetic field exposure history. In spite of these concerns, the results encourage further examination of the carcinogenic potential from this form of nonionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3164167     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  82 in total

1.  Influence of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields in combination with a tumour promoting phorbol ester on protein kinase C and cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Doreen Richard; Sandra Lange; Torsten Viergutz; Ralf Kriehuber; Dieter G Weiss; Simkó Myrtill
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way.

Authors:  Sabine Ivancsits; Elisabeth Diem; Oswald Jahn; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Sublethal effect of a weak intermittent magnetic field on the development of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) tadpoles.

Authors:  M Severini; A M Dattilo; A De Gaetano
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 4.  Health risks associated with residential exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic radiation.

Authors:  R J Lamarine; R A Narad
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-10

5.  Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; A Kobayashi-Kirschvink; B J Woodford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bayesian posterior distributions without Markov chains.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu; Sander Greenland; Ghassan Hamra; David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Electromagnetic radiation in homes.

Authors:  S Best
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

8.  Health and electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  D F Austin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

9.  Occupational exposure to power frequency magnetic fields and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  K Karipidis; G Benke; M Sim; L Fritschi; M Yost; B Armstrong; A M Hughes; A Grulich; C M Vajdic; J Kaldor; A Kricker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case-control study in California.

Authors:  Leeka Kheifets; Catherine M Crespi; Chris Hooper; Myles Cockburn; Aryana T Amoon; Ximena P Vergara
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.