Literature DB >> 10944614

A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia.

A Ahlbom1, N Day, M Feychting, E Roman, J Skinner, J Dockerty, M Linet, M McBride, J Michaelis, J H Olsen, T Tynes, P K Verkasalo.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested an association between exposure to 50-60 Hz magnetic fields (EMF) and childhood leukaemia. We conducted a pooled analysis based on individual records from nine studies, including the most recent ones. Studies with 24/48-hour magnetic field measurements or calculated magnetic fields were included. We specified which data analyses we planned to do and how to do them before we commenced the work. The use of individual records allowed us to use the same exposure definitions, and the large numbers of subjects enabled more precise estimation of risks at high exposure levels. For the 3203 children with leukaemia and 10 338 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures levels < 0.4 microT, we observed risk estimates near the no effect level, while for the 44 children with leukaemia and 62 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures >/= 0.4 microT the estimated summary relative risk was 2.00 (1.27-3.13), P value = 0.002). Adjustment for potential confounding variables did not appreciably change the results. For North American subjects whose residences were in the highest wire code category, the estimated summary relative risk was 1.24 (0.82-1.87). Thus, we found no evidence in the combined data for the existence of the so-called wire-code paradox. In summary, the 99.2% of children residing in homes with exposure levels < 0.4 microT had estimates compatible with no increased risk, while the 0.8% of children with exposures >/= 0.4 microT had a relative risk estimate of approximately 2, which is unlikely to be due to random variability. The explanation for the elevated risk is unknown, but selection bias may have accounted for some of the increase. Copyright 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944614      PMCID: PMC2363518          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

1.  Do confounding or selection factors of residential wiring codes and magnetic fields distort findings of electromagnetic fields studies?

Authors:  E E Hatch; R A Kleinerman; M S Linet; R E Tarone; W T Kaune; A Auvinen; D Baris; L L Robison; S Wacholder
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Childhood leukemia and personal monitoring of residential exposures to electric and magnetic fields in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  L M Green; A B Miller; D A Agnew; M L Greenberg; J Li; P J Villeneuve; R Tibshirani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Combined risk estimates for two German population-based case-control studies on residential magnetic fields and childhood acute leukemia.

Authors:  J Michaelis; J Schüz; R Meinert; E Zemann; J P Grigat; P Kaatsch; U Kaletsch; A Miesner; K Brinkmann; W Kalkner; H Kärner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Electromagnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Norwegian high-voltage power lines.

Authors:  T Tynes; T Haldorsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer.

Authors:  N Wertheimer; E Leeper
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Adult cancer related to electrical wires near the home.

Authors:  N Wertheimer; E Leeper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines.

Authors:  M Feychting; A Ahlbom
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Electromagnetic field exposures and childhood cancers in New Zealand.

Authors:  J D Dockerty; J M Elwood; D C Skegg; G P Herbison
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Residence near high voltage facilities and risk of cancer in children.

Authors:  J H Olsen; A Nielsen; G Schulgen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-09

10.  Risk of cancer in Finnish children living close to power lines.

Authors:  P K Verkasalo; E Pukkala; M Y Hongisto; J E Valjus; P J Järvinen; K V Heikkilä; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-09
View more
  93 in total

Review 1.  The precautionary principle and electric and magnetic fields.

Authors:  D Jamieson; D Wartenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayazit; Banu Bayram; Zeydin Pala; Ozkan Atan
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Analysis of personal and bedroom exposure to ELF-MFs in children in Italy and Switzerland.

Authors:  Benjamin Struchen; Ilaria Liorni; Marta Parazzini; Stephanie Gängler; Paolo Ravazzani; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Reported associations between asthma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: insights from a hybrid simulation study.

Authors:  Madhuri Sudan; Onyebuchi A Arah; Jorn Olsen; Leeka Kheifets
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Childhood cancer and power lines: results depend on chosen control group.

Authors:  Leeka Kheifets; Maria Feychting; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-17

Review 7.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields: promising treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Wang; L Yang; J Jiang; Y Liu; Z Fan; C Zhong; C He
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Epidemiologic study of residential proximity to transmission lines and childhood cancer in California: description of design, epidemiologic methods and study population.

Authors:  Leeka Kheifets; Catherine M Crespi; Chris Hooper; Sona Oksuzyan; Myles Cockburn; Thomas Ly; Gabor Mezei
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Are occupational, hobby, or lifestyle exposures associated with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukaemia?

Authors:  J Björk; M Albin; H Welinder; H Tinnerberg; N Mauritzson; T Kauppinen; U Strömberg; B Johansson; R Billström; Z Mikoczy; T Ahlgren; P G Nilsson; F Mitelman; L Hagmar
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Childhood Leukemia and Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Joseph L Wiemels; Amanda W Singer; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.