Alterations in plantar vessel blood flow in patients with mild diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Early identification and treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) are crucial. Presently, the mechanism of DPN is not very clear, and there are inconclusive conclusions about the influencing factors of vascular dynamic characteristics in DPN. This study aims to detect and compare the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar blood vessels in patients with mild DPN and healthy participants to explore a simple and reliable new idea and a potential method for early assessment of DPN and to investigate the influence of gender and age on hemodynamic characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty age-matched and gender-matched patients with mild DPN (30 men and 30 women) and 60 healthy participants were randomly recruited. Color Doppler ultrasound was used to measure and analyze the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related vessels.
RESULTS: Ultrasonic measurements had good test-retest reliability. There may be no statistically significant differences in the blood flow velocity and blood flow in the plantar-related blood vessels of participants, irrespective of their gender and age. For patients with mild DPN, color Doppler ultrasound may indicate early hemodynamic abnormalities when there are no obvious abnormalities in the large arteries of the lower limbs, which are specifically manifested as increased blood flow velocity and blood flow in the distal small vessels.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides in vivo data support for the dynamic characteristics of the plantar blood vessel biomechanical model and provides a new idea of in vivo and non-invasive early diagnosis of DPN. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Some studies have shown that vascular changes and damage to the inner wall of blood vessels can damage the normal function and structure of peripheral nerves, thereby inducing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

For patients with DPN with mild neuropathy, if the color Doppler ultrasound examination of the lower extremity arteries does not reveal obvious morphological abnormalities, early hemodynamic abnormalities have appeared in small blood vessels.

DPN with mild neuropathy has increased blood flow velocity and blood flow in the small blood vessels of the lower extremities.

There may be no statistically significant difference in the blood flow velocity and blood flow of the plantar-related blood vessels between gender and age.

When the clinical symptoms of DPN are mild, the management of the blood vessels in the foot may be a promising management model for diabetic complications, which can be used to improve the early recognition of DPN or delay the disease progression.

These findings support more foot blood flow tests in patients with DPN, including a larger patient population, while intervening in DPN and trying new research methods.

Introduction

Diabetes is one of the common chronic endocrine diseases, which adversely affects the quality of life and even the patient’s life span. In recent years, with the changes in an individual’s lifestyle, environment, dietary structure, and global ageing, the incidence of diabetes has increased significantly, and a trend of younger age at diabetes onset has been observed. According to the latest report of the International Diabetes Federation in 2019, globally, approximately 463 million adults aged 20–79 years were diabetic (1 in 11 people were diabetic), which by 2030, the number is expected to reach 578.4 million, and by 2045, 700.2 million people might have diabetes. This increase will inevitably be accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of diabetic complications.1

Among the many complications, diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is more common. Its clinical manifestations are diverse, such as mild limb pain, numbness, paresthesia, and intermittent fatigue. Severe cases may suffer from ischemic gangrene of the lower limbs and may risk amputation.2 Patients with DPN are 10–20 times more likely to have an amputation than those without. Every 30 s, a patient with DPN has their lower limbs or part of their lower limbs amputated.3 Therefore, early identification and treatment of DPN are crucial. Presently, detection methods and diagnostic standards of DPN have not been unified, which affects clinical diagnosis and treatment.4 Thus, it is necessary to find a simple, convenient, fast and reliable method for early diagnosis of DPN.

Presently, the mechanism of DPN is not very clear. The mechanism was once thought to be related to vascular dysfunction, metabolic disorders, neurotrophic factor deficiency, immune mechanism abnormalities, oxidative stress, etc. It is currently considered to be the result of the combined effects of various factors, among which vascular and metabolic factors are the most important.5 6 Some studies have reported that oxidative stress and metabolic disorders can cause vascular changes and damage to the inner wall of blood vessels, resulting in damage to the structure and function of peripheral nerves and inducing DPN. These studies provide ideas for early DPN screening.7–9 Some researchers have also confirmed that patients with DPN have impaired vasodilation and abnormal vascular morphology.10 11 Abnormal structural morphology parameters will inevitably be accompanied by changes in vascular dynamic performance parameters (blood pressure, blood flow velocity, blood flow, etc). Nabuurs-Franssen et al 12 reported that the capillary blood flow in the dorsum of the feet of patients with DPN was lower than that of healthy volunteers. Pfützner et al’s13 findings confirmed the relationship between small nerve fiber injury and skin microvascular dysfunction. Park et al 14 found that the positive peak perfusion and thermal hyperemia of the DPN group were significantly lower than that of the healthy control group and the diabetic control group without DPN. Archer et al 15 found that the resting blood flow in the feet of patients with DPN was five times that in healthy participants’ feet. These studies provide valuable information for a further study of vascular dynamic characteristics of DPN. However, there is no final conclusion about the changes and influencing factors of hemodynamic characteristics in patients with DPN.

Based on color Doppler ultrasound technology, the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related blood vessels in healthy individuals and patients with mild DPN were measured and compared, and the influence of age and gender on hemodynamic characteristics was investigated.

Method

Participant selection

This study randomly recruited 60 patients with type 2 diabetes and DPN in the Department of Neurology of the Second Hospital of Jilin University. An experienced neurologist confirmed the diagnosis of DPN with a ‘diagnosed’ clinical level.16 DPN was classified according to the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) as ‘probable neuropathy’.16 17 TCSS score standard: 0–5 points indicate no DPN; 6–8 points, mild DPN; 9–11 points, moderate DPN; and 12–19 points, severe DPN. In our study, the first step involved selecting patients with mild DPN with a TCSS score of 6–8. In the second step, patients with mild DPN underwent a vibration perception threshold (VPT) test, and patients with mild DPN with VPT results (range, 15–20) were selected and finally enrolled in the study. All tests were completed by experienced neurologists.18 The group without diabetes randomly recruited 60 volunteers corresponding to their age (volunteers meet the requirement of past fasting blood glucose level of <7.0 mmol/L, random blood glucose level of <11.0 mmol/L, glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.5%, no clear diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of diabetes). All participants in our study confirmed that they agreed to participate in the trial voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria involved patients with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of <0.9 at rest, a toe-brachial index of <0.6, or a decrease in the ABI by 20% 1 min after exercise, or with atherosclerotic plaque formation, arterial stenosis, or occlusion in the lower extremity confirmed using Doppler ultrasound. Additionally, patients with a history of amputation of both lower limbs, plantar fasciitis, foot infection, plantar warts, lumbar spinal stenosis, athlete’s foot or a foot ulcer, recent vigorous physical activity, and a history of being overweight were also excluded.

Participants with mild DPN and those without diabetes were divided into the following three groups according to age: group I (40–49 years old), group II (50–59 years old), and group III (>60 years old). There were 20 people in each group: 10 men and 10 women. The basic information of participants is presented in table 1.

Table 1

Characteristic of participants

Characteristic	Healthy control group						Type 2 diabetes DPN patient group
	Age group 1		Age group 2		Age group 3		Age group 1		Age group 2		Age group 3
Male/female (n)	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10
Age (years)	44.6±1.8	45.9±1.8	55±3.2	54.4±2.7	63.6±2.3	65.8±2.1	44.9±2.8	45.5±1.8	55±2.2	54.1±2.5	64.1±3.2	62.3±1.9
Height (cm)	176±6.5	162±6.7	173±6.6	163±6.9	173±6.7	167±10.1	173±6.7	164±7.4	177±5.2	166±4.8	174±4.3	166±6.4
Weight (kg)	66±5.2	56±5.0	69.9±6.2	56.8±7.1	68.9±5.5	64.5±9.6	67.3±8.0	59.5±7.2	71.6±4.5	65.6±4.3	68.6±6.3	64.8±4.6
BMI (kg/m2)	21.4±2.1	21.3±1.0	23.3±1.0	21.4±1.6	23.0±1.0	23.0±1.3	22.3±1.6	22.1±1.8	22.9±1.1	23.7±0.3	22.7±1.3	23.4±0.5
Duration of diabetes	N	N	N	N	N	N	4±3	4±2.2	7.4±4.3	6.2±3.1	14±9	14.3±7.2
Systolic BP (mm Hg)	119±10	113±9	121±11	125±13	123±16	122±12	118±7	116±4	124±8	120±5	125±3	125±4
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)	80±5	77±8	82±4	83±5	85±4	85±2	82±3	76±5	81±5	80±3	85±3	83±4
HbA1c (%)	4.7±0.6	4.5±0.4	5.2±0.3	5.3±0.6	5.3±0.5	5.4±0.3	7.3±0.3	7.4±0.3	8.1±0.3	7.9±0.7	8.6±0.4	8.4±0.5
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (mmol/L)	2.19±0.5	2.4±0.6	2.53±0.4	2.63±0.2	3.02±0.5	2.93±0.7	2.73±0.8	2.66±0.6	3.1±0.4	3.02±0.4	3.08±0.3	3.08±0.5
TCSS	N	N	N	N	N	N	6.7±0.5	6.8±0.4	7.6±0.3	7.4±0.4	7.8±0.2	7.7±0.2

Values are expressed as means±SD.

'N' means no duration of diabetes.

BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; DPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy; TCSS, Toronto Clinical Scoring System.

Experimental equipment and protocol

With reference to plantar vascular anatomy17 and hemodynamics,19 our study evaluated the six major arteries that supply blood to the foot sole, namely the first common plantar artery (FiCPDA), second common plantar artery (SCPDA), third common plantar artery (TCPDA), fourth common plantar artery (FoCPDA), posterior tibial artery (PTA), and fibular side of the first plantar toe proper artery (FPPDA). In the study, using an ultrasound imaging system (Aixplorer; SuperSonic Imagine, France) and a 2–10 MHz linear array broadband ultrasound probe, the hemodynamic parameters of the six arteries of each participant’s foot were measured in the supine position (figure 1A). To keep participants steady, they were asked to lie down and rest for 10 min before the test and to keep their bodies relaxed throughout the test. At the same time, the temperature of the test room was maintained at 25°C to eliminate the influence of temperature on measurement results. The relative humidity was controlled at 20%–60%, and all tests were completed within 30 days of the same season.

Figure 1

(A) Test position of the subject. (B) Typical color Doppler image of fibular proper plantar digital artery of the first toe. (C) Typical color Doppler image of posterior tibial artery.

With the help of the anatomical position, six arteries were located and measured to ensure consistency of the participant’s detected positions. For instance, for evaluating the FPPDA, the ultrasound probe was located on the fibular side of the first toe, and the S end of the probe was facing the far end of the plantar. The probe angle should be adjusted, and the bony bulge of the distal phalanx of the first toe should be observed in the collected images. When the cortical bone was clearly displayed, the blood flow signal was collected on the left side of the cortical bone (figure 1B). The peak blood flow velocity and blood flow during systole were selected for analysis.20–22 The hemodynamic parameters of each blood vessel were measured three times by two doctors with >3 years of ultrasonic clinical testing experience.

Data analyses

The analyses of the measurement data of all hemodynamic parameters were performed using SPSS Statistics software V.21.0 (SPSS). As recommended by Hopkins,23 repeatability of the blood flow and its velocity in plantar vessels were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (3, 1) (ICC3,1), two-way random, absolute agreement, with 95% CI. It is generally believed that the repeatability of data measurement is poor when ICC ranges from 0 to 0.40; in the ranges of 0.41–0.60 and 0.61–0.79, the repeatability of data measurement was moderate and good. In the range of 0.8–1.0, the repeatability of data measurement was excellent.23 The differences in hemodynamic parameters between the mild DPN group and the group without diabetes were analyzed with variance analysis of multiple comparisons using the general linear model method, and the effects of age and gender on hemodynamic characteristics were discussed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The measured values of hemodynamic parameters were expressed as mean±SD.

Results

Repeatability analysis of measurement of hemodynamic parameters

The repeatability of vascular blood flow velocity and blood flow measurements is presented in online supplemental table S1. The results indicated that the ICC3,1 of blood flow velocity ranged from 0.964 to 0.991 (95% CI 0.967 to 0.996), and the ICC3,1 of blood flow ranged from 0.950 to 0.985 (95% CI 0.953 to 0.991).

Effects of gender and age on hemodynamic parameters

The hemodynamic parameters based on gender are summarized in tables 2 and 3. There were no statistically significant differences in the blood flow velocity and blood flow in plantar-related blood vessels among men and women, irrespective of whether participants had mild DPN or were healthy.

The hemodynamic parameters of three different age groups are presented in online supplemental tables S2 and S3. There were no statistically significant differences in the blood flow velocity and blood flow in the foot-related blood vessels among three different age groups, irrespective of whether participants had mild DPN or were healthy.

Effect of DPN on hemodynamic parameters

The hemodynamic parameters of the mild DPN group and the group without diabetes are presented in table 4. Except for the PTA, the blood flow velocity and blood flow of other blood vessels were significantly different between the mild DPN group and the group without diabetes (p<0.001), and the blood flow velocity and blood flow were greater in the mild DPN group than in the group without diabetes.

Table 4

Blood flow velocity (unit: cm/s) and volume (unit: mL/min) of blood vessels between DPN and healthy control group

Vessels	Gender	Blood flow velocity	Blood flow volume
				FPPDA	Healthy	15.83±4.45	1.33±0.60
DPN	26.34±6.24*	2.60±1.05*
FiCPDA	Healthy	17.92±4.05	1.48±0.68
	DPN	27.45±6.23*	2.64±0.95*
SCPDA	Healthy	18.69±3.33	1.4±0.58
	DPN	25.59±5.66*	2.53±1.14*
TCPDA	Healthy	22.76±4.15	1.43±0.65
	DPN	31.07±6.61*	2.44±0.86*
FoCPDA	Healthy	20.52±5.75	1.42±0.67
	DPN	28.45±6.29*	3.02±1.67*
PTA	Healthy	32.63±6.99	3.47±1.95
	DPN	35.62±10.47	3.8±2.07

Values are expressed as means ±SD.

The multiple comparisons were carried out for the statistical analysis. DPN and the group without diabetes were compared once.

*There is significant difference between DPN and the group without diabetes (p<0.05).

DPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy; FiCPDA, first common plantar artery; FoCPDA, fourth common plantar artery; FPPDA, first plantar toe proper artery; PTA, posterior tibial artery; SCPDA, second common plantar artery; TCPDA, third common plantar artery.

Discussion

The onset of DPN is often occult, and the progress of the disease is slow. At the onset, patients often have no conscious symptoms. When the clinical symptoms manifest, the peripheral nerve has irreversible damage with corresponding pathological changes. Therefore, the early evaluation of DPN is crucial. If DPN is diagnosed early, active control of blood glucose level could be achieved, and necessary foot care could be administered in time; thus, foot ulcers, gangrene, amputation, and other serious consequences could be avoided.24 DPN is a length-dependent neuropathy in which the damage of the epidermal axon of the distal lower extremity precedes the damage of the axon of the proximal lower extremity. Dyck et al 25 showed that the distribution of nerve damage in DPN is limb specific, and the lower limbs are affected earlier in the course of the disease. The neurophysiological evaluation of the distal branches of the sensory nerves of the lower extremities (such as the plantar nerves), in theory, may increase the sensitivity of nerve conduction study diagnosis, thereby allowing early DPN diagnosis.26 27 Consistently, even in the early stages of the disease, neurophysiological examination of the distal nerves of the lower limbs (the dorsal sural nerve and medial and lateral plantar nerves) may help demonstrate distal axonal degeneration.28 Galiero et al 29 confirmed the ability of whole plantar nerve (WPN) conduction in the early diagnosis of DPN. The study showed that the plantar nerve is affected earlier in the development of DPN than other peripheral nerves, resulting in the development of corresponding lesions. Therefore, according to the vascular anatomy and hemodynamics, our study evaluated six main arteries of the plantar and the hemodynamic characteristics under the condition of whole-body relaxation of the participants and explored the changes in plantar-related hemodynamic parameters in patients with mild DPN and healthy controls. Our study provides a richer theoretical basis for the pathogenesis of DPN and the study of foot hemodynamics and provides new ideas and data support for the early evaluation and diagnosis of clinical DPN.

Our study evaluated the accuracy of color Doppler ultrasound measurement of the hemodynamic parameters of plantar-related blood vessels using remeasurement reliability. For all blood flow and blood flow velocity measurements, the ICC and 95% CI ranged from 0.950 to 0.991 and 0.953 to 0.996, respectively. Our study shows excellent test–retest reliability in the ultrasonic detection results of systemic vascular blood flow and blood flow velocity, which also shows that color Doppler ultrasound is a reliable and repeatable technology. In measuring the hemodynamic parameters of plantar vessels, it may become an important tool for studying the pathogenesis and early diagnosis of DPN.

Our patients with type 2 diabetes with mild DPN and the healthy participants had normal body mass index (BMI). The BMI of all participants was between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2; however, there was no significant difference. The difference in test results caused by obesity was excluded. Previous studies on the lower extremity arteries of participants focused mainly on main blood vessels of the lower extremities, such as the PTA, femoral artery, dorsal foot artery, etc. There are few reports on the blood supply arteries of the front plantar region. Guirro et al 20 studied the blood flow velocity of the lower extremity arteries in diabetic women. The study found that the peak blood flow velocity in the PTA of healthy individuals was 55.47±13.06 cm/s. Fronek et al 21 also reported that the peak blood flow velocity in the PTA of healthy individuals was 16.0±10.0 cm/s. In our study, the peak blood flow velocity in the PTA lies between the values reported in the previous two studies. The reason for this difference may be related to the different measurement positions of the tested blood vessels. Moreover, it is well known that even for the same blood vessel, participants’ different exercise states, different body positions, and other factors will result in differences in vascular hemodynamic parameters. Therefore, considering the differences in the distribution characteristics of vascular hemodynamic parameters,30–32 the probe and measurement position were strictly defined in our study. In previous studies, it was reported that the degree of stenosis of blood vessels directly affects the blood flow velocity.24 33 Bonesi et al 34 used Doppler optical coherence tomography non-invasively to monitor the blood flow velocity distribution in blood vessels with complex geometric shapes in vivo. The study found that the blood flow velocity distribution was non-uniform and closely related to the geometry of the blood vessel. Therefore, to avoid measurement errors caused by differences in the shape and direction of the plantar blood vessels, consistency between measurement positions for different participants was guaranteed. Based on the vascular anatomy atlas, the cortical bone structure of calcaneus, phalanx, and metatarsal bones was selected to locate and measure six arterial blood vessels. With the PTA as an example, the probe was placed 2.5 cm inferior to the medial malleolus protrusion. With the B-mode ultrasound, the PTA was visible, and the cortical structure of the calcaneus was placed at the lower right boundary of the imaging area. By fine tuning the direction of the ultrasonic probe, data collection of blood flow and blood flow velocity was performed when the PTA was clearly visible with a stable blood flow signal (figure 1C). Thus, our study guaranteed the consistency of measurement positions between different participants and operators.

Regarding the influence of gender on the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related blood vessels, there was no significant statistical difference in the blood flow velocity and blood flow of plantar-related blood vessels between men and women, irrespective of whether participants had mild DPN or were healthy. The p values of the statistical test of the dynamic parameters of blood flow among men and women are presented in online supplemental tables S4 and S5. Regarding the influence of age on the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related blood vessels, there was no statistically significant difference in the blood flow velocity and blood flow of plantar-related blood vessels in different genders, irrespective of whether participants had mild DPN or were healthy. The p values of the statistical test of blood flow dynamic parameters among three different age groups are presented in online supplemental tables S6 and S7. Although our results indicated that gender and age have no effect on the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related blood vessels, it does not indicate that the hemodynamic characteristics of blood vessels were not changed. The reason for the analysis may be related to selection and number of participants analyzed here. For participants, arteriosclerosis caused by age and gender35 36 has not reached the level of causing significant changes in the hemodynamic characteristics of blood vessels; it may also be related to the small sample size, measurement location, and other factors. Therefore, the influence of gender and age on the hemodynamic characteristics of plantar-related blood vessels remains to be further studied. To study the influence of age on the hemodynamic characteristics of foot-related vessels, the selection of age group was considered in our study. In a previous study, Jan et al 37 reported that for healthy volunteers, the difference in age may not cause a significant effect of ageing on microvascular dysfunction.37 A previous study also demonstrated that significant changes related to ageing were observed for patients over 65 years old.38 Sun et al 39 explored the correlation between the microvascular microcirculation and DPN severity in patients aged 50–60 years. Viswanathan et al 40 evaluated the blood supply of lower limbs in patients with DPN aged 60–76 based on transcutaneous oxygen tension. In addition to the studies of single-age group, some age group divisions covered the typical and important stages of human life, which is of great significance to the study of the whole process of human life; however, these age divisions have a large span for each age group and lack some middle-aged data. Therefore, based on previous studies, our study divides all participants into groups by age at 10-year intervals, filling the gaps in previous studies that lack part of the middle-aged plantar-related vascular dynamic parameters.

Additionally, our study examined and compared the plantar-related vascular dynamic characteristics of patients with mild DPN and healthy controls and explored the effect of DPN on hemodynamic parameters. Our results indicate that PTA is a major blood vessel that supplies the sole of the plantar, and FiCPDA, SCPDA, TCPDA, FoCPDA, and FPPDA belong to the small vessels of the plantar artery branch. In the early period of DPN, when the hemodynamic parameters of the large vessel did not change significantly, the blood vessel velocity and blood flow in small vessels of the plantar artery branch changed, indicating that the changes in the local small blood vessel developed before the lesions of the plantar large blood vessels. This may be owing to a compensatory physiological response because the heat dissipation process, owing to increased metabolism, is achieved by accelerating the blood flow.41 It is also possible that owing to the hypercoagulable state of blood in patients with diabetes, the deposition of glycosylation end products leads to stenosis of the vascular lumen, and the early-stage DPN mainly involves the small vessels. When blood flows through relatively narrow small blood vessels, the blood flow signal becomes weaker, and the flow rate becomes constant, resulting in faster blood flow. With the aggravation of the disease, the body’s hyperglycemia state accelerates the process of forming end-glycosylation products. The increased number of end-glycosylation products leads to accumulation, which in turn induces various pathological changes, thickens the blood vessel wall, and reduces blood vessel elasticity after the proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Mononuclear macrophages and smooth muscle cells induce a lipid reaction that leads to plaque formation, further narrowing or even occluding the blood vessel lumen, and reduced blood flow, which ultimately leads to a series of clinical manifestations of ischemia.42 Although the results of our study show that in patients with mild DPN, the color Doppler ultrasound examination of the lower extremities does not indicate obvious abnormalities, the small blood vessels already appear to have early hemodynamic abnormalities, including the increase in blood flow velocity and blood flow. However, this study only conducted a cross-sectional study on patients and could not absolutely infer the causal relationship between the results and mild DPN. At the same time, with known correlations between different complications of diabetes, especially in the early stage,43 for example, using color Doppler ultrasound technology, fundus examination, assessment of kidney function in terms of estimated glomerular filtration rate, and estimation of kidney damage in terms of albuminuria,44 45 it may be possible to evaluate the relationship between early DPN and complications such as diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy. Therefore, our findings can help identify early signs of neuropathy and may identify or exclude other complications of diabetes, such as diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy, etc.43

The color Doppler ultrasound technology was used in our study to detect and compare the hemodynamic characteristics of foot-related vessels in the mild DPN group and the group without diabetes and to explore the influence of gender and age on hemodynamic characteristics, which is of great significance. Our study provides the in vivo data support for the dynamic characteristics of foot hemodynamic modeling and provides more information for early clinical evaluation and diagnosis.

However, our study has certain limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study. Presently, it is not possible to infer the causal relationship between our findings and mild DPN absolutely. In follow-up research, with more participants, the hemodynamic characteristics of the plantar blood vessels can be tracked and monitored longitudinally to identify the trends and factors of hemodynamic characteristics during the occurrence and development of DPN, which may be helpful towards the prevention and treatment of DPN and serious foot complications. Second, the sample size of our study was limited to 120 cases (60 patients and 60 healthy controls). Thus, a larger population is needed to determine whether there are differences between different age groups and gender groups. Third, except for the PTA, the major artery supplying blood to the plantar, the other five arteries evaluated in the study were all distributed in the sole of the plantar. Thus, it is essential to compare the hemodynamic characteristics of the dorsal foot-related vessels between the mild DPN group and the group without diabetes in the future. Fourth, recent studies have shown that diabetic plantar neuropathy can be diagnosed with WPN conduction. WPN testing needs to be included in follow-up studies to facilitate further research and evaluation of the correlation between WPN and early recognition of plantar blood vessels in patients with diabetes. Last, only patients with mild DPN with a TCSS score of 6–8 were selected in our study because some studies have confirmed that the severity of DPN will affect the vascular microcirculation.39 Hence, future studies should clarify the impact of DPN severity on hemodynamic characteristics.

Conclusions

In summary, our study provides data support for the dynamic characteristics of blood vessel biomechanics modeling in the foot and provides a new idea of non-invasive, simple, convenient, and rapid early assessment of DPN for clinical use. The color Doppler ultrasound technology is a reliable and repeatable technique for measuring the hemodynamic parameters of plantar vessels. Regardless of gender and age, there may be no statistically significant differences in the blood flow velocity and blood flow of the blood vessels associated with the plantar of the participants. For patients with mild DPN, the early hemodynamic abnormalities, that is, the increase in blood flow velocity and blood flow, appeared in small vessels without obvious abnormalities in color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the lower extremity artery.

Table 2

Blood flow velocity of blood vessels between different genders (unit: cm/s)

Vessels	Gender	Healthy			DPN
		Age group 1	Age group 2	Age group 3	Age group 1	Age group 2	Age group 3
FPPDA	Male	12.96±4.08	15.81±4.94	17.90±4.23	25.22±3.70	29.73±8.11	27.64±8.27
	Female	15.48±1.67	14.65±3.96	18.14±4.69	24.67±4.14	24.58±3.71	26.18±5.88
FiCPDA	Male	16.01±5.04	18.01±3.00	19.63±4.12	29.21±6.84	28.97±7.93	25.43±6.28
	Female	17.01±3.06	17.22±3.97	19.63±3.35	27.27±4.04	27.38±5.99	26.46±4.60
SCPDA	Male	17.81±2.36	19.79±2.79	17.49±2.87	27.15±8.51	26.28±4.42	24.24±5.57
	Female	18.70±2.76	19.48±3.84	18.84±4.31	24.12±1.56	27.47±5.22	24.28±5.22
TCPDA	Male	21.66±4.02	21.54±3.01	24.12±3.82	33.13±8.16	34.04±6.68	30.77±7.70
	Female	21.38±4.33	22.69±4.51	25.07±3.54	28.00±5.08	29.75±3.73	30.72±5.23
FoCPDA	Male	19.19±7.31	20.25±3.99	23.69±6.51	30.45±4.69	27.64±5.579	31.52±8.38
	Female	20.42±4.62	19.96±5.82	19.63±4.28	27.69±4.66	25.83±3.18	27.54±7.72
PTA	Male	30.86±6.61	32.18±7.71	35.69±9.76	32.53±3.54	37.09±10.18	34.49±12.19
	Female	32.12±3.97	29.89±3.98	36.03±6.12	33.27±8.30	34.75±5.71	41.57±15.39

Values are expressed as means±SD.

The multiple comparisons were carried out for the statistical analysis. One comparison was made between the genders (p=0.05).

DPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy; FiCPDA, first common plantar artery; FoCPDA, fourth common plantar artery; FPPDA, first plantar toe proper artery; PTA, posterior tibial artery; SCPDA, second common plantar artery; TCPDA, third common plantar artery.

Table 3

Blood flow of blood vessels between different genders (unit: mL/min)

Vessels	Gender	Healthy			DPN
		Age group 1	Age group 2	Age group 3	Age group 1	Age group 2	Age group 3
FPPDA	Male	1.20±0.42	1.20±0.63	1.40±0.70	2.37±0.67	2.77±0.82	2.60±1.39
	Female	1.30±0.48	1.30±0.48	1.60±0.70	2.13±1.07	2.53±1.06	3.17±0.82
FiCPDA	Male	1.50±0.53	1.30±0.48	1.50±0.71	2.63±0.76	2.64±1.11	2.23±0.82
	Female	1.50±0.71	1.30±0.48	1.80±0.92	2.60±1.24	3.03±0.71	2.70±0.73
SCPDA	Male	1.40±0.70	1.30±0.48	1.40±0.52	2.30±0.74	2.43±1.25	2.67±1.49
	Female	1.30±0.48	1.30±0.48	1.70±0.67	2.13±1.07	2.77±0.63	2.90±1.21
TCPDA	Male	1.50±0.52	1.20±0.42	1.80±0.79	2.53±0.36	2.63±1.29	2.73±0.89
	Female	1.30±0.67	1.40±0.70	1.40±0.52	2.17±0.53	2.40±0.62	2.17±0.98
FoCPDA	Male	1.30±0.48	1.30±0.67	1.50±0.71	3.23±1.34	2.60±1.36	2.93±1.77
	Female	1.60±0.70	1.10±0.32	1.70±0.82	3.47±1.90	2.94±1.89	2.967±1.54
PTA	Male	3.80±2.20	2.80±1.69	4.30±2.06	3.40±0.98	4.17±1.94	4.07±1.61
	Female	4.00±2.45	2.50±1.08	3.40±1.07	3.10±1.64	3.40±1.58	2.67±3.37

Values are expressed as means±SD.

The multiple comparisons were carried out for the statistical analysis. One comparison was made between the genders (p=0.05).

DPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy; FiCPDA, first common plantar artery; FoCPDA, fourth common plantar artery; FPPDA, first plantar toe proper artery; PTA, posterior tibial artery; SCPDA, second common plantar artery; TCPDA, third common plantar artery.