Literature DB >> 24676004

Low-power inversion recovery MRI preserves brain tissue contrast for patients with Parkinson disease with deep brain stimulators.

S N Sarkar1, E Papavassiliou2, R Rojas3, D L Teich3, D B Hackney3, R A Bhadelia3, J Stormann3, R L Alterman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Fast spin-echo short τ inversion recovery sequences have been very useful for MR imaging-guided deep brain stimulation procedures in Parkinson disease. However, high-quality fast spin-echo imaging deposits significant heat, exceeding FDA-approved limits when patients already have undergone deep brain stimulation and need a second one or a routine brain MR imaging for neurologic indications. We have developed a STIR sequence with an ultra-low specific absorption rate that meets hardware limitations and produces adequate tissue contrast in cortical and subcortical brain tissues for deep brain stimulation recipients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with medically refractory Parkinson disease who qualified for deep brain stimulation were imaged at 1.5T with a fast spin-echo short τ inversion recovery sequence modified to meet conditional MR imaging hardware and specific absorption rate restrictions. Tissue contrast-to-noise ratios and implant localization were objectively and subjectively compared by 2 neuroradiologists, and image quality for surgical planning was assessed by a neurosurgeon for high and low specific absorption rate images.
RESULTS: The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for cerebral tissues without including the contrast-to-noise ratio for ventricular fluid was 35 and 31 for high and low specific absorption rate images. Subjective ratings for low specific absorption rate tissue contrast in 77% of patients were identical to (and in a few cases higher than) those of high specific absorption rate contrast, while the neurosurgical coordinates for fusing the stereotactic atlas with low specific absorption rate MR imaging were equivalent to those of the high specific absorption rate for 69% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Parkinson disease who have already had a deep brain stimulation face a risk of neural injury if routine, high specific absorption rate MR imaging is performed. Our modified fast spin-echo short τ inversion recovery sequence conforms to very conservative radiofrequency safety limits, while it maintains high tissue contrast for presurgical planning, postsurgical assessment, and radiologic evaluations with greater confidence for radiofrequency safety.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24676004      PMCID: PMC7966586          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  19 in total

1.  Clinical safety of brain magnetic resonance imaging with implanted deep brain stimulation hardware: large case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ludvic Zrinzo; Fumiaki Yoshida; Marwan I Hariz; John Thornton; Thomas Foltynie; Tarek A Yousry; Patricia Limousin
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Using high-resolution MR imaging at 7T to evaluate the anatomy of the midbrain dopaminergic system.

Authors:  M Eapen; D H Zald; J C Gatenby; Z Ding; J C Gore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Variability in RF-induced heating of a deep brain stimulation implant across MR systems.

Authors:  Kenneth B Baker; Jean A Tkach; Micheal D Phillips; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of implanted deep brain stimulators: experience in a large series.

Authors:  Paul S Larson; R Mark Richardson; Philip A Starr; Alastair J Martin
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Does magnetic resonance imaging induce tissue damage due to DBS lead heating?

Authors:  Edvin Zekaj; Christian Saleh; Claudia Menghetti; Domenico Servello
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Direct visualization of the human subthalamic nucleus with 3T MR imaging.

Authors:  K V Slavin; K R Thulborn; C Wess; H Nersesyan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Brain MR imaging at ultra-low radiofrequency power.

Authors:  Subhendra N Sarkar; David C Alsop; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Reed F Busse; Philip M Robson; Neil M Rofsky; David B Hackney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The sensitivity of low flip angle RARE imaging.

Authors:  D C Alsop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in Parkinson disease with the use of 7-tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zang-Hee Cho; Hoon-Ki Min; Se-Hong Oh; Jae-Yong Han; Chan-Woong Park; Je-Geun Chi; Young-Bo Kim; Sun Ha Paek; Andres M Lozano; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  An assessment of current brain targets for deep brain stimulation surgery with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 tesla.

Authors:  Aviva Abosch; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil; Noam Harel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  2 in total

1.  MRI in patients with implanted active devices: how to combine safety and image quality using a limited transmission field?

Authors:  Laura Lunden; Stephan Wolff; Sönke Peters; Catharina Drews; Christine Gierloff; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Patrick Langguth; Jawid Madjidyar; Tim-Christian Piesch; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.