Literature DB >> 21839969

Clinical safety of brain magnetic resonance imaging with implanted deep brain stimulation hardware: large case series and review of the literature.

Ludvic Zrinzo1, Fumiaki Yoshida, Marwan I Hariz, John Thornton, Thomas Foltynie, Tarek A Yousry, Patricia Limousin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 75,000 patients have undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures worldwide. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important clinical and research tool in analyzing electrode location, documenting postoperative complications, and investigating novel symptoms in DBS patients. Functional MRI may shed light on the mechanism of action of DBS. MRI safety in DBS patients is therefore an important consideration.
METHODS: We report our experience with MRI in patients with implanted DBS hardware and examine the literature for clinical reports on MRI safety with implanted DBS hardware.
RESULTS: A total of 262 MRI examinations were performed in 223 patients with intracranial DBS hardware, including 45 in patients with an implanted pulse generator. Only 1 temporary adverse event occurred related to patient agitation and movement during immediate postoperative MR imaging. Agitation resolved after a few hours, and an MRI obtained before implanted pulse generator implantation revealed edema around both electrodes. Over 4000 MRI examinations in patients with implanted DBS hardware have been reported in the literature. Only 4 led to adverse events, including 2 hardware failures, 1 temporary and 1 permanent neurological deficit. Adverse neurological events occurred in a unique set of circumstances where appropriate safety protocols were not followed. MRI guidelines provided by DBS hardware manufacturers are inconsistent and vary among devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The importance of MRI in modern medicine places pressure on industry to develop fully MRI-compatible DBS devices. Until then, the literature suggests that, when observing certain precautions, cranial MR images can be obtained with an extremely low risk in patients with implanted DBS hardware.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21839969     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  29 in total

Review 1.  Neural engineering: the process, applications, and its role in the future of medicine.

Authors:  Evon S Ereifej; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Hamid Charkhkar; Ivana Cuberovic; Alan D Dorval; Emily L Graczyk; Takashi D Y Kozai; Kevin J Otto; Dustin J Tyler; Cristin G Welle; Alik S Widge; José Zariffa; Chet T Moritz; Dennis J Bourbeau; Paul D Marasco
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Role of radiology in central nervous system stimulation.

Authors:  D P Minks; E A C Pereira; V E L Young; K M Hogarth; G Quaghebeur
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: update on recent discoveries and outlook on future developments.

Authors:  Philipp Mahlknecht; Patricia Limousin; Thomas Foltynie
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Evaluation of a Workflow to Define Low Specific Absorption Rate MRI Protocols for Patients With Active Implantable Medical Devices.

Authors:  Jessica A Martinez; Kévin Moulin; Bryan Yoo; Yu Shi; Hyun J Kim; Pablo J Villablanca; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Post-operative imaging in deep brain stimulation: A controversial issue.

Authors:  Christian Saleh; Georges Dooms; Christophe Berthold; Frank Hertel
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  MRI in patients with implanted active devices: how to combine safety and image quality using a limited transmission field?

Authors:  Laura Lunden; Stephan Wolff; Sönke Peters; Catharina Drews; Christine Gierloff; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Patrick Langguth; Jawid Madjidyar; Tim-Christian Piesch; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Low-power inversion recovery MRI preserves brain tissue contrast for patients with Parkinson disease with deep brain stimulators.

Authors:  S N Sarkar; E Papavassiliou; R Rojas; D L Teich; D B Hackney; R A Bhadelia; J Stormann; R L Alterman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Measurements of RF heating during 3.0-T MRI of a pig implanted with deep brain stimulator.

Authors:  Krzysztof R Gorny; Michael F Presti; Stephan J Goerss; Sun C Hwang; Dong-Pyo Jang; Inyong Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Yunhong Shu; Christopher P Favazza; Kendall H Lee; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  The preoperative neurological evaluation.

Authors:  John Probasco; Bogachan Sahin; Tung Tran; Tae Hwan Chung; Liana Shapiro Rosenthal; Zoltan Mari; Michael Levy
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.