M Eapen1, D H Zald, J C Gatenby, Z Ding, J C Gore. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, 1161 21st Ave South, AA 1101, Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2310, USA. mariam.eapen@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysfunction of DA neurotransmission from the SN and VTA has been implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases, including Parkinson disease and schizophrenia. Unfortunately, these midbrain DA structures are difficult to define on clinical MR imaging. To more precisely evaluate the anatomic architecture of the DA midbrain, we scanned healthy participants with a 7T MR imaging system. Here we contrast the performance of high-resolution T2- and T2*-weighted GRASE and FFE MR imaging scans at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy participants were scanned by using GRASE and FFE sequences. CNRs were calculated among the SN, VTA, and RN, and their volumes were estimated by using a segmentation algorithm. RESULTS: Both GRASE and FFE scans revealed visible contrast between midbrain DA regions. The GRASE scan showed higher CNRs compared with the FFE scan. The T2* contrast of the FFE scan further delineated substructures and microvasculature within the midbrain SN and RN. Segmentation and volume estimation of the midbrain SN, RN, and VTA showed individual differences in the size and volume of these structures across participants. CONCLUSIONS: Both GRASE and FFE provide sufficient CNR to evaluate the anatomy of the midbrain DA system. The FFE in particular reveals vascular details and substructure information within the midbrain regions that could be useful for examining structural changes in midbrain pathologies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysfunction of DA neurotransmission from the SN and VTA has been implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases, including Parkinson disease and schizophrenia. Unfortunately, these midbrain DA structures are difficult to define on clinical MR imaging. To more precisely evaluate the anatomic architecture of the DA midbrain, we scanned healthy participants with a 7T MR imaging system. Here we contrast the performance of high-resolution T2- and T2*-weighted GRASE and FFE MR imaging scans at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy participants were scanned by using GRASE and FFE sequences. CNRs were calculated among the SN, VTA, and RN, and their volumes were estimated by using a segmentation algorithm. RESULTS: Both GRASE and FFE scans revealed visible contrast between midbrain DA regions. The GRASE scan showed higher CNRs compared with the FFE scan. The T2* contrast of the FFE scan further delineated substructures and microvasculature within the midbrain SN and RN. Segmentation and volume estimation of the midbrain SN, RN, and VTA showed individual differences in the size and volume of these structures across participants. CONCLUSIONS: Both GRASE and FFE provide sufficient CNR to evaluate the anatomy of the midbrain DA system. The FFE in particular reveals vascular details and substructure information within the midbrain regions that could be useful for examining structural changes in midbrain pathologies.
Authors: Robert Semnic; Marina Svetel; Natasa Dragasevic; Igor Petrovic; Dusko Kozic; Jelena Marinkovic; Vladimir S Kostic; R Nuri Sener Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Luigi Zecca; Daniela Berg; Thomas Arzberger; Petra Ruprecht; Wolf D Rausch; Massimo Musicco; Davide Tampellini; Peter Riederer; Manfred Gerlach; Georg Becker Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Susan J Melhorn; Sonya Mehta; Mario Kratz; Vidhi Tyagi; Mary F Webb; Carolyn J Noonan; Dedra S Buchwald; Jack Goldberg; Kenneth R Maravilla; Thomas J Grabowski; Ellen A Schur Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Y Murakami; S Kakeda; K Watanabe; I Ueda; A Ogasawara; J Moriya; S Ide; K Futatsuya; T Sato; K Okada; T Uozumi; S Tsuji; T Liu; Y Wang; Y Korogi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gilles de Hollander; Max C Keuken; Wietske van der Zwaag; Birte U Forstmann; Robert Trampel Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: M J Hoch; M T Bruno; A Faustin; N Cruz; L Crandall; T Wisniewski; O Devinsky; T M Shepherd Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Francesca Bagnato; Simon Hametner; David Pennell; Richard Dortch; Adrienne N Dula; Siddharama Pawate; Seth A Smith; Hans Lassmann; John C Gore; Edward B Welch Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Brian J Mickey; Joseph Heffernan; Curtis Heisel; Marta Peciña; David T Hsu; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Tiffany M Love Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 4.530