BACKGROUND: Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) can be used to measure key aspects of tumor vascularity in vivo and recent studies suggest that perfusion imaging may be useful in the early assessment of response to angiogenesis inhibitors. Aim of this work is to compare Parametric Response Maps (PRMs) with the Region Of Interest (ROI) approach in the analysis of tumor changes induced by bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent glioblastomas (rGBM), and to evaluate if changes in tumor blood volume measured by perfusion MRI may predict clinical outcome. METHODS: 42 rGBM patients with KPS ≥ 50 were treated until progression, as defined by MRI with RANO criteria. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) variation after 8 weeks of treatment was calculated through semi-automatic ROI placement in the same anatomic region as in baseline. Alternatively, rCBV variations with respect to baseline were calculated into the evolving tumor region using a voxel-by-voxel difference. PRMs were created showing where rCBV significantly increased, decreased or remained unchanged. RESULTS: An increased blood volume in PRM (PRMCBV+) higher than 18% (first quartile) after 8 weeks of treatment was associated with increased progression free survival (PFS; 24 versus 13 weeks, p = 0.045) and overall survival (OS; 38 versus 25 weeks, p = 0.016). After 8 weeks of treatment ROI analysis showed that mean rCBV remained elevated in non responsive patients (4.8 ± 0.9 versus 5.1 ± 1.2, p = 0.38), whereas decreased in responsive patients (4.2 ± 1.3 versus 3.8 ± 1.6 p = 0.04), and re-increased progressively when patients approached tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PRMs can provide an early marker of response to antiangiogenic treatment and warrant further confirmation in a larger cohort of GBM patients.
BACKGROUND: Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) can be used to measure key aspects of tumor vascularity in vivo and recent studies suggest that perfusion imaging may be useful in the early assessment of response to angiogenesis inhibitors. Aim of this work is to compare Parametric Response Maps (PRMs) with the Region Of Interest (ROI) approach in the analysis of tumor changes induced by bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent glioblastomas (rGBM), and to evaluate if changes in tumor blood volume measured by perfusion MRI may predict clinical outcome. METHODS: 42 rGBM patients with KPS ≥ 50 were treated until progression, as defined by MRI with RANO criteria. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) variation after 8 weeks of treatment was calculated through semi-automatic ROI placement in the same anatomic region as in baseline. Alternatively, rCBV variations with respect to baseline were calculated into the evolving tumor region using a voxel-by-voxel difference. PRMs were created showing where rCBV significantly increased, decreased or remained unchanged. RESULTS: An increased blood volume in PRM (PRMCBV+) higher than 18% (first quartile) after 8 weeks of treatment was associated with increased progression free survival (PFS; 24 versus 13 weeks, p = 0.045) and overall survival (OS; 38 versus 25 weeks, p = 0.016). After 8 weeks of treatment ROI analysis showed that mean rCBV remained elevated in non responsive patients (4.8 ± 0.9 versus 5.1 ± 1.2, p = 0.38), whereas decreased in responsive patients (4.2 ± 1.3 versus 3.8 ± 1.6 p = 0.04), and re-increased progressively when patients approached tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PRMs can provide an early marker of response to antiangiogenic treatment and warrant further confirmation in a larger cohort of GBM patients.
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christina Tsien; Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Timothy D Johnson; Daniel A Hamstra; Pia C Sundgren; Larry Junck; Charles R Meyer; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Theodore Lawrence; Brian D Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rahul N Sawlani; Jeffrey Raizer; Sandra W Horowitz; Wanyong Shin; Sean A Grimm; James P Chandler; Robert Levy; Christopher Getch; Timothy J Carroll Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S J Mills; C Soh; J P B O'Connor; C J Rose; G Buonaccorsi; S Cheung; S Zhao; G J M Parker; A Jackson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Meng Law; Robert J Young; James S Babb; Nicole Peccerelli; Sophie Chheang; Michael L Gruber; Douglas C Miller; John G Golfinos; David Zagzag; Glyn Johnson Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Kyrre E Emblem; Dan G Duda; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Matija Snuderl; Marek Ancukiewicz; Pavlina Polaskova; Marco C Pinho; Dominique Jennings; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew S Chi; April F Eichler; Jorg Dietrich; Fred H Hochberg; Christine Lu-Emerson; A John Iafrate; S Percy Ivy; Bruce R Rosen; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; A Greg Sorensen; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Daniel A Hamstra; Larry Junck; Pia C Sundgren; Timothy D Johnson; David J Ross; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Nat Med Date: 2009-04-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: D Daniels; D Guez; D Last; C Hoffmann; D Nass; A Talianski; G Tsarfaty; S Salomon; A A Kanner; D T Blumenthal; F Bokstein; S Harnof; D Yekutieli; S Zamir; Z R Cohen; L Zach; Y Mardor Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sang Hyun Choi; Seung Chai Jung; Kyung Won Kim; Ja Youn Lee; Yoonseok Choi; Seong Ho Park; Ho Sung Kim Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Christine Lu-Emerson; Dan G Duda; Kyrre E Emblem; Jennie W Taylor; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Jay S Loeffler; Tracy T Batchelor; Rakesh K Jain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jerrold L Boxerman; Chad C Quarles; Leland S Hu; Bradley J Erickson; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Marion Smits; Timothy J Kaufmann; Daniel P Barboriak; Raymond H Huang; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Caroline Chung; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert; Bruce R Rosen; Benjamin M Ellingson; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: S Wang; M Martinez-Lage; Y Sakai; S Chawla; S G Kim; M Alonso-Basanta; R A Lustig; S Brem; S Mohan; R L Wolf; A Desai; H Poptani Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: R Kurokawa; A Baba; M Kurokawa; A Capizzano; O Hassan; T Johnson; Y Ota; J Kim; A Hagiwara; T Moritani; A Srinivasan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David Molina; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Alicia Martínez-González; Juan M Sepúlveda; Sergi Peralta; Miguel J Gil-Gil; Gaspar Reynes; Ana Herrero; Ramón De Las Peñas; Raquel Luque; Jaume Capellades; Carmen Balaña; Víctor M Pérez-García Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240