R Kurokawa1, A Baba2, M Kurokawa2, A Capizzano2, O Hassan2, T Johnson3, Y Ota2, J Kim2, A Hagiwara4, T Moritani2, A Srinivasan2. 1. From the Division of Neuroradiology (R.K., A.B., M.K., A.C., O.H., Y.O., J.K., T.M., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan kuroro63@gmail.com. 2. From the Division of Neuroradiology (R.K., A.B., M.K., A.C., O.H., Y.O., J.K., T.M., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Biostatistics (T.J.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Radiology (A.H.), Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mean ADC value of the lower Gaussian curve (ADCL) derived from the bi-Gaussian curve-fitting histogram analysis has been reported as a predictive/prognostic imaging biomarker in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab; however, its systematic summary has been lacking. PURPOSE: We applied a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive/prognostic performance of ADCL in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 1344 abstracts were screened, of which 83 articles were considered potentially relevant. Data were finally extracted from 6 studies including 578 patients. DATA ANALYSIS: Forest plots were generated to illustrate the hazard ratios of overall survival and progression-free survival. The heterogeneity across the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 values. DATA SYNTHESIS: The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with an ADCL lower than the cutoff values were 1.89 (95% CI, 1.53-2.31) and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.54-2.55) with low heterogeneity among the studies. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-free cohort showed a pooled hazard ratio for overall survival of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.08-1.34) with low heterogeneity. LIMITATIONS: The conclusions are limited by the difference in the definition of recurrence among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review with meta-analysis supports the prognostic value of ADCL in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab, with a low ADCL demonstrating decreased overall survival and progression-free survival. On the other hand, the predictive role of ADCL for bevacizumab treatment was not confirmed.
BACKGROUND: The mean ADC value of the lower Gaussian curve (ADCL) derived from the bi-Gaussian curve-fitting histogram analysis has been reported as a predictive/prognostic imaging biomarker in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab; however, its systematic summary has been lacking. PURPOSE: We applied a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive/prognostic performance of ADCL in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 1344 abstracts were screened, of which 83 articles were considered potentially relevant. Data were finally extracted from 6 studies including 578 patients. DATA ANALYSIS: Forest plots were generated to illustrate the hazard ratios of overall survival and progression-free survival. The heterogeneity across the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 values. DATA SYNTHESIS: The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with an ADCL lower than the cutoff values were 1.89 (95% CI, 1.53-2.31) and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.54-2.55) with low heterogeneity among the studies. Subgroup analysis of the bevacizumab-free cohort showed a pooled hazard ratio for overall survival of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.08-1.34) with low heterogeneity. LIMITATIONS: The conclusions are limited by the difference in the definition of recurrence among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review with meta-analysis supports the prognostic value of ADCL in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab, with a low ADCL demonstrating decreased overall survival and progression-free survival. On the other hand, the predictive role of ADCL for bevacizumab treatment was not confirmed.
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Hyun J Kim; Jing Huo; Jeffry Alger; Matthew S Brown; David Gjertson; Victor Sai; Jonathan R Young; Leena Tekchandani; Timothy Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Jonathan Goldin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Erwin G Van Meir; Costas G Hadjipanayis; Andrew D Norden; Hui-Kuo Shu; Patrick Y Wen; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Wolfgang Wick; Thierry Gorlia; Martin Bendszus; Martin Taphoorn; Felix Sahm; Inga Harting; Alba A Brandes; Walter Taal; Julien Domont; Ahmed Idbaih; Mario Campone; Paul M Clement; Roger Stupp; Michel Fabbro; Emilie Le Rhun; Francois Dubois; Michael Weller; Andreas von Deimling; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Jacoline C Bromberg; Michael Platten; Martin Klein; Martin J van den Bent Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert J Harris; Timothy F Cloughesy; Anthony J Hardy; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elke Hattingen; Oliver Bähr; Johannes Rieger; Stella Blasel; Joachim Steinbach; Ulrich Pilatus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240