Literature DB >> 18349315

Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.

Meng Law1, Robert J Young, James S Babb, Nicole Peccerelli, Sophie Chheang, Michael L Gruber, Douglas C Miller, John G Golfinos, David Zagzag, Glyn Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine whether relative cerebral blood volume (CBV) measurements can be used to predict clinical outcome in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and specifically whether patients who have gliomas with a high initial relative CBV have more rapid progression than those who have gliomas with a low relative CBV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approval for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was obtained from the Institutional Board of Research Associates, with waiver of informed consent. One hundred eighty-nine patients (122 male and 67 female patients; median age, 43 years; range, 4-80 years) were examined with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast material-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and were followed up clinically with MR imaging (median follow-up, 334 days). Log-rank tests were used to evaluate the association between relative CBV and time to progression by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Binary logistic regression was used to determine whether age, sex, and relative CBV were associated with an adverse event (progressive disease or death).
RESULTS: Values for the mean relative CBV for patients according to each clinical response were as follows: 1.41 +/- 0.13 (standard deviation) for complete response (n = 4), 2.36 +/- 1.78 for stable disease (n = 41), 4.84 +/- 3.32 for progressive disease (n = 130), and 3.82 +/- 1.93 for death (n = 14). Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time to progression in days indicated that patients with a relative CBV of less than 1.75 had a median time to progression of 3585 days, whereas patients with a relative CBV of more than 1.75 had a time to progression of 265 days. Age and relative CBV were also independent predictors for clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging can be used to predict median time to progression in patients with gliomas, independent of pathologic findings. Patients who have HGGs and LGGs with a high relative CBV (>1.75) have a significantly more rapid time to progression than do patients who have gliomas with a low relative CBV. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349315      PMCID: PMC3774106          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2472070898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI of gliomas.

Authors:  Hannu J Aronen; Jussi Perkiö
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 2.  Perfusion imaging in the pediatric patient.

Authors:  W S Ball ; S K Holland
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study.

Authors:  Stephan G Wetzel; Soonmee Cha; Glyn Johnson; Peter Lee; Meng Law; David L Kasow; Sean D Pierce; Xiaonan Xue
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas.

Authors:  R J Jackson; G N Fuller; D Abi-Said; F F Lang; Z L Gokaslan; W M Shi; D M Wildrick; R Sawaya
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives.

Authors:  C Carl Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Value of dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of intracranial tumors.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; Y Shigematsu; L Liang; K Yoshizumi; M Kitajima; M Takahashi
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-04

7.  Interobserver reproducibility among neuropathologists and surgical pathologists in fibrillary astrocytoma grading.

Authors:  R A Prayson; D P Agamanolis; M L Cohen; M L Estes; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; F Abdul-Karim; S P McClure; B A Sebek; R Vinay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 8.  Prospective clinical trials of intracranial low-grade glioma in adults and children.

Authors:  Edward G Shaw; Jeffrey H Wisoff
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Shin; Ho Kyu Lee; Byung Duk Kwun; Jin-Suh Kim; Weechang Kang; Choong Gon Choi; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Phase III randomized study of postradiotherapy chemotherapy with combination alpha-difluoromethylornithine-PCV versus PCV for anaplastic gliomas.

Authors:  Victor A Levin; Kenneth R Hess; Ali Choucair; Patrick J Flynn; Kurt A Jaeckle; Athanassios P Kyritsis; W K Alfred Yung; Michael D Prados; Janet M Bruner; Sandra Ictech; Mary Jo Gleason; Hyung-Woo Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  198 in total

1.  The Holy Grail and the quest for the gold standard.

Authors:  Z Rumboldt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Tracer kinetic modelling of tumour angiogenesis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI measurements.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Jürgen Griebel; Fabian Kiessling; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Physiologic MRI for assessment of response to therapy and prognosis in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark S Shiroishi; Jerrold L Boxerman; Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  3D Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging in the Preoperative Evaluation of Gliomas.

Authors:  Q Zeng; B Jiang; F Shi; C Ling; F Dong; J Zhang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Survival analysis in patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme using pre- and post-treatment peritumoral perfusion imaging parameters.

Authors:  Asim K Bag; Phillip C Cezayirli; Jake J Davenport; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; Alan Cantor; Xiaosi S Han; Louis B Nabors
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Invited review--neuroimaging response assessment criteria for brain tumors in veterinary patients.

Authors:  John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 9.  MR imaging of brain pilocytic astrocytoma: beyond the stereotype of benign astrocytoma.

Authors:  Simona Gaudino; Matia Martucci; Rosellina Russo; Emiliano Visconti; Emma Gangemi; Francesco D'Argento; Tommaso Verdolotti; Libero Lauriola; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Enhancing fraction in glioma and its relationship to the tumoral vascular microenvironment: A dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study.

Authors:  S J Mills; C Soh; J P B O'Connor; C J Rose; G Buonaccorsi; S Cheung; S Zhao; G J M Parker; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.