Literature DB >> 24673749

Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.

Bin Zheng1, Maxine Tan, Pandiyarajan Ramalingam, David Gur.   

Abstract

This study investigated association between bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and near-term breast cancer risk. A data base of digital mammograms acquired from 690 women was retrospectively collected. All images were originally interpreted as negative by radiologists. During the next subsequent screening examinations (between 12 and 36 months later), 230 women were diagnosed positive for cancer, 230 were recalled for additional diagnostic workups and proved to be benign, and 230 remained negative (not recalled). We applied a computerized scheme to compute the differences of five image features between the left and right mammograms, and trained an artificial neural network (ANN) to compute a bilateral mammographic density asymmetry score. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess associations between the ANN-generated scores and risk of women having detectable cancers during the next screening examinations. A logistic regression method was applied to test for trend as a function of the increase in ANN-generated scores. The results were also compared with ORs computed using other existing cancer risk factors. The ORs showed an increasing risk trend with the increase in ANN-generated scores (from 1.00 to 9.07 between positive and negative case groups). The regression analysis also showed a significant increase trend in slope (p < 0.05). No significant increase trends of the ORs were found when using woman's age, subjectively rated breast density, or family history of breast cancer. This study demonstrated that the computed bilateral mammographic density asymmetry had potential to be used as a new risk factor to improve discriminatory power in predicting near-term risk of women developing breast cancer.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral mammographic density asymmetry; breast cancer risk; breast density; cancer risk prediction; mammography screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673749      PMCID: PMC4134869          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  35 in total

1.  Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Phuong L Mai
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin; Ferris M Hall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Karla Kerlikowske; Andrew Loh; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; Xiao Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Mona Shah; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Edward A Sickles; Robert A Smith; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Robert D Rosenberg; Berta M Geller; Tracy L Onega; Barbara S Monsees; Lawrence W Bassett; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe; James G Mainprize
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Diana L Miglioretti; Natasha K Stout; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Diana S M Buist; Hui Huang; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Aimee M Near; Karla Kerlikowske; Heidi D Nelson; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  11 in total

1.  Left-right analysis of mammary gland development in retinoid X receptor-α+/- mice.

Authors:  Jacqulyne P Robichaux; John W Fuseler; Shrusti S Patel; Steven W Kubalak; Adam Hartstone-Rose; Ann F Ramsdell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Abolfazl Zargari Khuzani; Alan B Hollingsworth; Gopichandh Danala; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Yane Li; Ming Fan; Hu Cheng; Peng Zhang; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.

Authors:  Yane Li; Wei Yuan; Ming Fan; Bin Zheng; Lihua Li
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 4.903

5.  Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Shiju Yan; Yunzhi Wang; Faranak Aghaei; Yuchen Qiu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Rachel Denholm; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Diana L Miglioretti; Matthew R Jensen; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Carrie Hruska; Lin Ma; Fang Fang Wu; Steven R Cummings; Aaron D Norman; Natalie J Engmann; John A Shepherd; Stacey J Winham; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammography features for early markers of aggressive breast cancer subtypes and tumor characteristics: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Pui San Tan; Maya Alsheh Ali; Mikael Eriksson; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.