Literature DB >> 24671535

Alignment of sound localization cues in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus.

Sean J Slee1, Eric D Young2.   

Abstract

Accurate sound localization is based on three acoustic cues (interaural time and intensity difference and spectral cues from directional filtering by the pinna). In natural listening conditions, every spatial position of a sound source provides a unique combination of these three cues in "natural alignment." Although neurons in the central nucleus (ICC) of the inferior colliculus (IC) are sensitive to multiple cues, they do not favor their natural spatial alignment. We tested for sensitivity to cue alignment in the nucleus of the brachium of the IC (BIN) in unanesthetized marmoset monkeys. The BIN receives its predominant auditory input from ICC and projects to the topographic auditory space map in the superior colliculus. Sound localization cues measured in each monkey were used to synthesize broadband stimuli with aligned and misaligned cues; spike responses to these stimuli were recorded in the BIN. We computed mutual information (MI) between the set of spike rates and the stimuli containing either aligned or misaligned cues. The results can be summarized as follows: 1) BIN neurons encode more information about auditory space when cues are aligned compared with misaligned. 2) Significantly more units prefer aligned cues in the BIN than in ICC. 3) An additive model based on summing the responses to stimuli with the localization cues varying individually accurately predicts the alignment preference with all cues varying. Overall, the results suggest that the BIN is the first site in the ascending mammalian auditory system that is tuned to natural combinations of sound localization cues.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachium of inferior colliculus; cue alignment; inferior colliculus; marmoset monkey; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671535      PMCID: PMC4044433          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00885.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Information-theoretic analysis of neural coding.

Authors:  D H Johnson; C M Gruner; K Baggerly; C Seshagiri
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Involvement of monkey inferior colliculus in spatial hearing.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; Huib Versnel; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes.

Authors:  B Zhou; D M Green; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Superior colliculus: some receptive field properties of bimodally responsive cells.

Authors:  B G Wickelgren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A neural code for auditory space in the cat's superior colliculus.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position.

Authors:  M F Jay; D L Sparks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 May 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The representation of auditory space in the mammalian superior colliculus.

Authors:  A R Palmer; A J King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perineuronal nets and subtypes of GABAergic cells differentiate auditory and multisensory nuclei in the intercollicular area of the midbrain.

Authors:  Nichole L Beebe; William A Noftz; Brett R Schofield
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Specific loss of neural sensitivity to interaural time difference of unmodulated noise stimuli following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Austin R Pollard; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Major remaining gaps in models of sensorimotor systems.

Authors:  Gerald E Loeb; George A Tsianos
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Connor Campbell; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.