Literature DB >> 6727988

Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position.

M F Jay, D L Sparks.   

Abstract

The process by which sensory signals are transformed into commands for the control of movement is poorly understood. A potential site for such a transformation is the superior colliculus (SC), which receives auditory, visual and somatosensory inputs and contains neurones that discharge before saccadic eye movements. Along the primary sensory pathways, signals coding the spatial location of auditory, visual and somatosensory targets are based on distinctly different coordinate systems, and it is not known whether each type of sensory input uses a separate motor pathway or if they are converted into a common coordinate system in order to share a single pre-motor circuit. Sensory neurones in the SC have spatially restricted receptive fields (RFs) and are organized into maps across the collicular surface. Acute experiments have shown a rough correspondence between the spatial positions of RFs of neurones encountered along a single dorsal-ventral penetration of the colliculus, regardless of the modality of the effective stimulus, suggesting that auditory, visual and somatosensory maps might be in register. However, in these conditions the head-centred auditory system and the retinotopic visual system are aligned because the eyes are in the primary orbital position. Moreover, other data have suggested that the primate SC is organized in motor, not sensory, coordinates, although in the cat, eye position was found to have no effect on auditory receptive fields. We therefore sought here to determine what happens to the registration of the auditory and visual maps in the alert, behaving animal. Monkeys, with heads fixed, were trained to make delayed saccadic eye movements to auditory or visual targets from one of three initial fixation points while the activity of single neurones was recorded extracellularly. We found that the auditory receptive fields shifted with changes in eye position, allowing the auditory and visual maps to remain in register.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6727988     DOI: 10.1038/309345a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  80 in total

1.  Plasticity in the neural coding of auditory space in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  A J King; C H Parsons; D R Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Two models for transforming auditory signals from head-centered to eye-centered coordinates.

Authors:  J M Groh; D L Sparks
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Distribution of eye position information in the monkey inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David A Bulkin; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of static eye and head position on tone-evoked gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Auditory signals evolve from hybrid- to eye-centered coordinates in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Saccades create similar mislocalizations in visual and auditory space.

Authors:  Hannah M Krüger; Thérèse Collins; Bernhard Englitz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of gaze direction on sound localization in brain-injured and normal adults.

Authors:  Eunhui Lie; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural correlates of intersensory processing in 5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Greg D Reynolds; Lorraine E Bahrick; Robert Lickliter; Maggie W Guy
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.