| Literature DB >> 24667333 |
Adwoa Asante-Poku1, Michael Selasi Nyaho2, Sonia Borrell3, Iñaki Comas4, Sebastien Gagneux3, Dorothy Yeboah-Manu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Different combinations of variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) loci have been proposed for genotyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Existing VNTR schemes show different discriminatory capacity among the six human MTBC lineages. Here, we evaluated the discriminatory power of a "customized MIRU12" loci format proposed previously by Comas et al. based on the standard 24 loci defined by Supply et al. for VNTR-typing of MTBC in Ghana.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24667333 PMCID: PMC3965448 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of MIRU-VNTRs used for the assay.
| LOCUS | ALIAS | 15 | L4 | L5 |
| 424 | Mtub04 | X | X | X |
| 577 | ETRC | X | X | X |
| 580 | MIRU04 | X | ||
| 802 | MIRU40 | X | X | X |
| 960 | MIRU10 | X | X | X |
| 1644 | MIRU16 | X | ||
| 1955 | Mtub21 | X | X | X |
| 2163b | QUB11b | X | X | X |
| 2165 | ETRA | X | X | X |
| 2401 | Mtub30 | X | X | |
| 2531 | MIRU23 | X | X | |
| 2996 | MIRU26 | X | ||
| 3007 | MIRU27 | X | ||
| 3192 | MIRU31 | X | X | |
| 3690 | Mtub39 | X | X | |
| 4052 | QUB26 | X | X | X |
| 4156 | QUB4156 | X | X | X |
Cumulative HGI and clustering rate for Lineage 4 successive addition of individual MIRU-VNTR Loci.
| Locus | VNTR Loci | Alias | No. of Clusters | No. of clustered isolates | No. of isolates in individual cluster | Clustering Rate (%) | Individual HGI | Cumulative HGI |
| 1 | 4052 | QUB26 | 9 | 96 | 2–34 | 82.1 | 0.829 | 0.829 |
| 2 | 2163B | QUB11B | 23 | 88 | 2–9 | 61.3 | 0.804 | 0.966 |
| 3 | 802 | MIRU40 | 20 | 53 | 2–8 | 31.1 | 0.742 | 0.988 |
| 4 | 2165 | ETRA | 13 | 28 | 2–4 | 14.2 | 0.702 | 0.996 |
| 5 | 960 | MIRU10 | 8 | 19 | 2–4 | 10.4 | 0.689 | 0.997 |
| 6 | 4156 | QUB4165 | 4 | 11 | 2–4 | 6.6 | 0.639 | 0.999 |
| 7 | 3690 | Mtu39 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2.8 | 0.66 | 0.999 |
| 8 | 2401 | Mtu30 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2.8 | 0.64 | 0.999 |
| 9 | 2996 | MIRU26 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.628 | 0.999 |
| 10 | 424 | Mtu04 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.613 | 0.999 |
| 11 | 577 | ETRC | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.553 | 0.999 |
| 12 | 1995 | Mtub21 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.579 | 0.999 |
| 13 | 2531 | VNTR23 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.555 | 0.999 |
| 14 | 1644 | MIRU16 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.452 | 0.999 |
| 15 | 3192 | MIRU31 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.37 | 0.999 |
| 16 | 580 | MIRU4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.092 | 0.999 |
(N = 106).
Cumulative HGI and clustering rate for Lineage 5 with successive addition of individual MIRU-VNTR Loci.
| Locus | VNTR Loci | Alias | No. of Clusters | No. of clustered isolates | No. of isolates in individual cluster | Clustering Rate (%) | Individual HGI | Cumulative HGI |
| 1 | 2163B | QUB11B | 6 | 52 | 2–13 | 88.5 | 0.797 | 0.798 |
| 2 | 4156 | QUB4156 | 12 | 45 | 2–9 | 63.5 | 0.731 | 0.935 |
| 3 | 802 | MIRU 40 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.971 |
| 4 | 2996 | MIRU 26 | 7 | 16 | 2–3 | 15.9 | 0.7 | 0.992 |
| 5 | 4052 | QUB26 | 10 | 31 | 2–5 | 40.4 | 0.69 | 0.997 |
| 6 | 1644 | MIRU 16 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5.7 | 0.689 | 0.998 |
| 7 | 3007 | MIRU 27 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.998 |
| 8 | 2531 | MIRU 23 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.58 | 0.998 |
| 9 | 424 | Mtub04 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.572 | 0.998 |
| 10 | 960 | MIRU 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.526 | 0.998 |
| 11 | 1955 | Mtub21 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.489 | 0.998 |
| 12 | 577 | ETRC | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.487 | 0.998 |
| 13 | 2401 | Mtub30 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 | 0.473 | 0.998 |
| 14 | 580 | MIRU04 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.9 | 0.472 | 0.999 |
| 15 | 3690 | Mtub39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.428 | 0.999 |
| 16 | 2165 | ETRA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.387 | 0.999 |
| 17 | 3192 | MIRU31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.352 | 0.999 |
N = 52.
Figure 1Individual and Cumulative HGI of analysed Loci.
Individual and cumulative HGI was calculated for each locus and after successive loci addition respectively for all analysed loci using the mathematical formula as proposed by Hunter and Gaston (36). The black bars are the cumulative HGI values while crossed bars are for the individual locus values. Fig. 1a and 1b show values for lineage 4 and 5 respectively.
Figure 2Clustering rate for lineages 4 and 5 calculated using after successive addition of analysed loci using the formula (nc - c)/n, where nc is the total number of clustered cases, c is the number of clusters, and n is the total number of cases in the sample a was calculated after successive addition of individual locus.
Fig. 2a and b shows clustering rate values for lineages 4 and 5 respectively.