PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) guided procedures are frequently performed for diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. However, there are safety and procedure duration limitations in US-guided interventions due to poor image quality and inadequate visibility of medical instruments in the field of view. To address this issue, we propose an interventional imaging system based on a mobile electromagnetic (EM) field generator (FG) attached to a US probe. METHODS: A standard US probe was integrated with an EM FG to allow combined movement of the FG with real-time imaging to achieve (1) increased tracking accuracy for medical instruments are located near the center of the tracking volume, (2) increased robustness because the FG is distant to large metallic objects, and (3) reduced setup complexity since time-consuming placement of the FG is not required. The new integrated US-FG imaging system was evaluated by assessing tracking and calibration accuracy in a clinical setting. To demonstrate clinical applicability, the prototype US-EMFG probe was tested in needle puncture procedures. RESULTS: The mobile EMFG attached to a US probe yielded sub-millimeter tracking accuracy despite the presence of metal close to the FG. Calibration errors were in the range of 1-2 mm. In an initial phantom study on US-guided needle punctures, targeting errors of about 3 mm were achieved. CONCLUSION: A combined US-EMFG probe is feasible and effective for tracking medical instruments relative to US images with high accuracy and robustness while keeping hardware complexity low.
PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) guided procedures are frequently performed for diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. However, there are safety and procedure duration limitations in US-guided interventions due to poor image quality and inadequate visibility of medical instruments in the field of view. To address this issue, we propose an interventional imaging system based on a mobile electromagnetic (EM) field generator (FG) attached to a US probe. METHODS: A standard US probe was integrated with an EM FG to allow combined movement of the FG with real-time imaging to achieve (1) increased tracking accuracy for medical instruments are located near the center of the tracking volume, (2) increased robustness because the FG is distant to large metallic objects, and (3) reduced setup complexity since time-consuming placement of the FG is not required. The new integrated US-FG imaging system was evaluated by assessing tracking and calibration accuracy in a clinical setting. To demonstrate clinical applicability, the prototype US-EMFG probe was tested in needle puncture procedures. RESULTS: The mobile EMFG attached to a US probe yielded sub-millimeter tracking accuracy despite the presence of metal close to the FG. Calibration errors were in the range of 1-2 mm. In an initial phantom study on US-guided needle punctures, targeting errors of about 3 mm were achieved. CONCLUSION: A combined US-EMFG probe is feasible and effective for tracking medical instruments relative to US images with high accuracy and robustness while keeping hardware complexity low.
Authors: Johann B Hummel; Michael R Bax; Michael L Figl; Yan Kang; Calvin Maurer; Wolfgang W Birkfellner; Helmar Bergmann; Ramin Shahidi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lena Maier-Hein; Aysun Tekbas; Alexander Seitel; Frank Pianka; Sascha A Müller; Stefanie Satzl; Simone Schawo; Boris Radeleff; Ralf Tetzlaff; Alfred M Franz; Beat P Müller-Stich; I Wolf; H-U Kauczor; B M Schmied; H-P Meinzer Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Alexander Seitel; Markus Engel; Christof M Sommer; Boris A Radeleff; Caroline Essert-Villard; Claire Baegert; Markus Fangerau; Klaus H Fritzsche; Kwong Yung; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Lena Maier-Hein Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Marco Nolden; Sascha Zelzer; Alexander Seitel; Diana Wald; Michael Müller; Alfred M Franz; Daniel Maleike; Markus Fangerau; Matthias Baumhauer; Lena Maier-Hein; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Ivo Wolf Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: David Sindram; Ryan Z Swan; Kwan N Lau; Iain H McKillop; David A Iannitti; John B Martinie Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Alfred Michael Franz; Alexander Seitel; Nasrin Bopp; Christian Erbelding; Dominique Cheray; Stefan Delorme; Frank Grünwald; Hüdayi Korkusuz; Lena Maier-Hein Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Christian Erbelding; Alfred Franz; Alexander Seitel; Nasrin Bopp; Konstantin Kohlhase; Frank Grünwald; Lena Maier-Hein Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Martin Klemm; Thomas Kirchner; Janek Gröhl; Dominique Cheray; Marco Nolden; Alexander Seitel; Harald Hoppe; Lena Maier-Hein; Alfred M Franz Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Benjamin J Mittmann; Alexander Seitel; Gernot Echner; Wiebke Johnen; Regula Gnirs; Lena Maier-Hein; Alfred M Franz Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 3.421