Literature DB >> 11750755

Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound system.

D M Muratore1, R L Galloway.   

Abstract

To create a freehand three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (US) system for image-guided surgical procedures, an US beam calibration process must be performed. The calibration method presented in this work does not use a phantom to define in 3-D space the pixel locations in the beam. Rather, the described method is based on the spatial relationship between an optically tracked pointer and a similarly tracked US transducer. The pointer tip was placed into the US beam, and US images, physical coordinates of the pointer and the transducer location were simultaneously recorded. US image coordinates of the pointer were mapped to the physical points using two different registration methods. Two sensitivity studies were performed to determine the location and number of points needed to calibrate the beam accurately. Results showed that the beam is most efficiently calibrated with approximately 20 points collected from throughout the beam. This method of beam calibration proved to be highly accurate, yielding registration errors of approximately 0.4 mm.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11750755     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00469-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  MITK-US: real-time ultrasound support within MITK.

Authors:  K März; A M Franz; A Seitel; A Winterstein; R Bendl; S Zelzer; M Nolden; H-P Meinzer; L Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Improving N-wire phantom-based freehand ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Guillermo Carbajal; Andras Lasso; Alvaro Gómez; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Toward a generic real-time compression correction framework for tracked ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas S Pheiffer; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Interventional real-time ultrasound imaging with an integrated electromagnetic field generator.

Authors:  K März; A M Franz; A Seitel; A Winterstein; M Hafezi; A Saffari; R Bendl; B Stieltjes; H-P Meinzer; A Mehrabi; L Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Guided ultrasound calibration: where, how, and how many calibration fiducials.

Authors:  Elvis C S Chen; Terry M Peters; Burton Ma
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Automatic virtual transducer locating system to assist in interpreting ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Tomoyuki Kuwata; Tomoko Ono; Kouichi Itoh; Kiyoka Omoto; Yasutomo Fujii; Akifumi Ootake
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Phantomless Auto-Calibration and Online Calibration Assessment for a Tracked Freehand 2-D Ultrasound Probe.

Authors:  Matthew Toews; William M Wells
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Model-based correction of tissue compression for tracked ultrasound in soft tissue image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Thomas S Pheiffer; Reid C Thompson; Daniel C Rucker; Amber L Simpson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.

Authors:  Rebekah H Conley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Jared A Weis; Thomas S Pheiffer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Spatial calibration of a 2D/3D ultrasound using a tracked needle.

Authors:  Francisco Vasconcelos; Donald Peebles; Sebastien Ourselin; Danail Stoyanov
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.924

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.