Literature DB >> 24663821

Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review.

Nicola Schieda1, Matthew D F McInnes, Lilly Cao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To use systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion (SEI) at contrast-enhanced biphasic multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.
METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched through October 2013. Two reviewers independently selected studies that met the inclusion criteria and extracted data. Study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. The primary 2 × 2 data were investigated with forest plot and ROC plot of sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (307 patients). Considerable heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analysis. Two studies from the same group of investigators demonstrated reasonable diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 59-80 % and specificity 87-99 %), while two others did not (sensitivity 0-6 %, specificity 93-100 %). Possible reasons for this include timing of biphasic MDCT and methods of interpretation but not size of lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: SEI is a specific imaging finding of renal oncocytoma with highly variable sensitivity. This substantial heterogeneity across studies and between institutions suggests that further validation of this imaging finding is necessary prior to application in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: SEI on CT in small renal masses is specific for oncocytoma. Sensitivity of SEI varies substantially between studies and across institutions. Variability could relate to CT timing or methods of interpretation. High accuracy of SEI has only been reported by one group. Validation of SEI is needed prior to clinical implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24663821     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3147-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  18 in total

1.  Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT?

Authors:  Ingrid Millet; Fernanda Curros Doyon; Denis Hoa; Rodolphe Thuret; Samuel Merigeaud; Isabelle Serre; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Renal oncocytoma: a clinicopathologic study of 70 cases.

Authors:  B Perez-Ordonez; G Hamed; S Campbell; R A Erlandson; P Russo; P B Gaudin; V E Reuter
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Is segmental enhancement inversion on enhanced biphasic MDCT a reliable sign for the noninvasive diagnosis of renal oncocytomas?

Authors:  John P McGahan; Ramit Lamba; Jerron Fisher; Phillip Starshak; Rajendra Ramsamooj; Evan Fitzgerald; Philip Yen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Mehmet Ozsoy; Hans-Christoph Klingler; Martin Susani; Matthias Waldert; Christian Seitz; Joerg Schmidbauer; Michael Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  M M Lieber
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Computed tomography of renal oncocytomas.

Authors:  R W Jasinski; M A Amendola; G M Glazer; R L Bree; P W Gikas
Journal:  Comput Radiol       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct

7.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  Renal oncocytoma and carcinoma: failure of differentiation with CT.

Authors:  A J Davidson; W S Hayes; D S Hartman; W F McCarthy; C J Davis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  Jung Im Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Kyung Chul Moon; Hak Jong Lee; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Maali Al-Subhi; Trevor A Flood; Mohammed El-Khodary; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

3.  Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel on renal cell carcinoma: update on past, current, and future goals.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Hersh Chandarana; Nicole E Curci; Ankur Doshi; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Ivan Pedrosa; Erick M Remer; Nicola Schieda; Atul B Shinagare; Andrew D Smith; Zhen J Wang; Shane A Wells; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-09

4.  Are growth patterns on MRI in small (< 4 cm) solid renal masses useful for predicting benign histology?

Authors:  Robert S Lim; Matthew D F McInnes; Mahadevaswamy Siddaiah; Trevor A Flood; Luke T Lavallee; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Importance of phase enhancement for machine learning classification of solid renal masses using texture analysis features at multi-phasic CT.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Kathleen Nguyen; Rebecca E Thornhill; Matthew D F McInnes; Mark Wu; Nick James
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-05

6.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Intracellular lipid in papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC): T2 weighted (T2W) MRI and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Christian B van der Pol; Bardia Moosavi; Matthew D F McInnes; Kien T Mai; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Role of computed tomography features in the differential diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from oncocytoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.

Authors:  Cuiping Zhou; Xiaohua Ban; Jianxun Lv; Lin Cheng; Jianmin Xu; Xinping Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

9.  A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with a central scar-matched study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Qianli Ma; Pei Nie; Yingmei Zheng; Cheng Dong; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas: a pictorial review with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Kousei Ishigami; Aaron R Jones; Laila Dahmoush; Leandro V Leite; Marius G Pakalniskis; Thomas J Barloon
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.