Literature DB >> 24662574

Characterizing individual differences in functional connectivity using dual-regression and seed-based approaches.

David V Smith1, Amanda V Utevsky2, Amy R Bland3, Nathan Clement2, John A Clithero4, Anne E W Harsch2, R McKell Carter2, Scott A Huettel5.   

Abstract

A central challenge for neuroscience lies in relating inter-individual variability to the functional properties of specific brain regions. Yet, considerable variability exists in the connectivity patterns between different brain areas, potentially producing reliable group differences. Using sex differences as a motivating example, we examined two separate resting-state datasets comprising a total of 188 human participants. Both datasets were decomposed into resting-state networks (RSNs) using a probabilistic spatial independent component analysis (ICA). We estimated voxel-wise functional connectivity with these networks using a dual-regression analysis, which characterizes the participant-level spatiotemporal dynamics of each network while controlling for (via multiple regression) the influence of other networks and sources of variability. We found that males and females exhibit distinct patterns of connectivity with multiple RSNs, including both visual and auditory networks and the right frontal-parietal network. These results replicated across both datasets and were not explained by differences in head motion, data quality, brain volume, cortisol levels, or testosterone levels. Importantly, we also demonstrate that dual-regression functional connectivity is better at detecting inter-individual variability than traditional seed-based functional connectivity approaches. Our findings characterize robust-yet frequently ignored-neural differences between males and females, pointing to the necessity of controlling for sex in neuroscience studies of individual differences. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of employing network-based models to study variability in functional connectivity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-regression analysis; Functional connectivity; Independent component analysis; Individual differences; Seed-based analysis; Split-sample validation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662574      PMCID: PMC4074548          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  79 in total

1.  The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Mariko Osaka; Naoyuki Osaka; Hirohito Kondo; Masanao Morishita; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshihiko Aso; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Robert Leech; Rodrigo Braga; David J Sharp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cognitive and default-mode resting state networks: do male and female brains "rest" differently?

Authors:  Irit Weissman-Fogel; Massieh Moayedi; Keri S Taylor; Geoff Pope; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.

Authors:  N J Sandstrom; J Kaufman; S A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

7.  The skin conductance orienting response as an index of attention.

Authors:  C D Frith; H A Allen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; James Loughead; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Rat brains also have a default mode network.

Authors:  Hanbing Lu; Qihong Zou; Hong Gu; Marcus E Raichle; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  51 in total

1.  Exploring spatiotemporal network transitions in task functional MRI.

Authors:  Gregory Scott; Peter J Hellyer; Adam Hampshire; Robert Leech
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Omission of temporal nuisance regressors from dual regression can improve accuracy of fMRI functional connectivity maps.

Authors:  Robert E Kelly; Matthew J Hoptman; George S Alexopoulos; Faith M Gunning; Martin J McKeown
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional brain segmentation using inter-subject correlation in fMRI.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Juha Pajula; Jari Niemi; Riitta Hari; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Longitudinal decreases in suicidal ideation are associated with increases in salience network coherence in depressed adolescents.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schwartz; Sarah J Ordaz; Tiffany C Ho; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Adolescent sex differences in cortico-subcortical functional connectivity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu Sun Chung; Vince Calhoun; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Developmental changes in functional brain networks from birth through adolescence.

Authors:  Elveda Gozdas; Scott K Holland; Mekibib Altaye
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Functional connectivity with distinct neural networks tracks fluctuations in gain/loss framing susceptibility.

Authors:  David V Smith; Kamila E Sip; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  INVESTIGATING DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN FUNCTIONAL NETWORKS USING HIERARCHICAL COVARIATE-ADJUSTED INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Ran Shi; Ying Guo
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Cortical sensorimotor alterations classify clinical phenotype and putative genotype of spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  G Battistella; S Fuertinger; L Fleysher; L J Ozelius; K Simonyan
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 10.  Using fMRI to study reward processing in humans: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Kainan S Wang; David V Smith; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.