Literature DB >> 31111341

Adolescent sex differences in cortico-subcortical functional connectivity during response inhibition.

Yu Sun Chung1, Vince Calhoun2,3, Michael C Stevens4,5.   

Abstract

Numerous lines of evidence have shown that cognitive processes engaged during response inhibition tasks are associated with structure and functional integration of regions within fronto-parietal networks. However, while prior studies have started to characterize how intrinsic connectivity during resting state differs between boys and girls, comparatively less is known about how functional connectivity differs between males and females when brain function is exogenously driven by the processing demands of typical Go/No-Go tasks that assess both response inhibition and error processing. The purpose of this study was to characterize adolescent sex differences and possible changes in sexually dimorphic regional functional connectivity across adolescent development in both cortical and subcortical brain connectivity elicited during a visual Go/No-Go task. A total of 130 healthy adolescents (ages 12-25 years) performed a Go/No-Go task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. High model-order group independent component analysis was used to characterize whole-brain network functional connectivity during response inhibition and then a univariate technique used to evaluate differences related to sex and age. As predicted and similar to previously described findings from non-task-driven resting state connectivity studies, functional connectivity sex differences were observed in several subcortical regions, including the amygdala, caudate, thalamus, and cortical regions, including inferior frontal gyrus engaged most strongly during successful response inhibition and/or error processing. Importantly, adolescent boys and girls exhibited different normative profiles of age-related changes in several default mode networks of regions and anterior cingulate cortex. These results suggest that cortical-subcortical functional networks supporting response inhibition operate differently between sexes during adolescence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Functional network connectivity; Response inhibition; Sex difference

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31111341      PMCID: PMC8259338          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00718-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  129 in total

1.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Flexible brain network reconfiguration supporting inhibitory control.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spielberg; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.

Authors:  J Kaufman; B Birmaher; D Brent; U Rao; C Flynn; P Moreci; D Williamson; N Ryan
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Default mode network as revealed with multiple methods for resting-state functional MRI analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Yu Long; Xi-Nian Zuo; Vesa Kiviniemi; Yihong Yang; Qi-Hong Zou; Chao-Zhe Zhu; Tian-Zi Jiang; Hong Yang; Qi-Yong Gong; Liang Wang; Kun-Cheng Li; Sheng Xie; Yu-Feng Zang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Effects of aging on cerebral blood flow, oxygen metabolism, and blood oxygenation level dependent responses to visual stimulation.

Authors:  Beau M Ances; Christine L Liang; Oleg Leontiev; Joanna E Perthen; Adam S Fleisher; Amy E Lansing; Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Another major function of the anterior cingulate cortex: the representation of requirements.

Authors:  C S E Weston
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Sex on the brain: Are gender-dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior?

Authors:  Anna Grabowska
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Gender effects on drug use, abuse, and dependence: a special analysis of results from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

Authors:  Jessica H Cotto; Elisabeth Davis; Gayathri J Dowling; Jennifer C Elcano; Anna B Staton; Susan R B Weiss
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2010-10

9.  Sex differences in associations of arginine vasopressin and oxytocin with resting-state functional brain connectivity.

Authors:  Leah H Rubin; Li Yao; Sarah K Keedy; James L Reilly; Jeffrey R Bishop; C Sue Carter; Hossein Pournajafi-Nazarloo; Lauren L Drogos; Carol A Tamminga; Godfrey D Pearlson; Matcheri S Keshavan; Brett A Clementz; Scot K Hill; Wei Liao; Gong-Jun Ji; Su Lui; John A Sweeney
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Automatic identification of functional clusters in FMRI data using spatial dependence.

Authors:  Sai Ma; Nicolle M Correa; Xi-Lin Li; Tom Eichele; Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adalı
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Neurobehavioral maturation of motor response inhibition in adolescence - A narrative review.

Authors:  Hannah Weiss; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 9.052

2.  Identifying periods of heightened susceptibility to lead exposure in relation to behavioral problems.

Authors:  Clara G Sears; Bruce P Lanphear; Yingying Xu; Aimin Chen; Kimberly Yolton; Joseph M Braun
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.563

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.