Literature DB >> 12667855

The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: an fMRI study.

Mariko Osaka1, Naoyuki Osaka, Hirohito Kondo, Masanao Morishita, Hidenao Fukuyama, Toshihiko Aso, Hiroshi Shibasaki.   

Abstract

Using fMRI, neural substrates of verbal working memory were investigated with respect to differences in working memory capacity. Listening-span test (LST), Listen, and Remember conditions were performed. Two subjects groups were selected: those who had large working memory capacities, labeled high-span subjects (HSS) according to the working memory span test, and those who had small working memory capacities, labeled low-span subjects (LSS). Significant activation was found mainly in three regions in comparison with resting control: left prefrontal cortex (PFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and temporal language area. For both groups, fMRI signal intensity increased in PFC during the LST condition compared to the Listen condition. A group difference was found in the ACC region; specifically, a significant increase in signal intensity was observed in ACC only for the HSS group and not for the LSS group. Behavioral data also showed that the performance was better in HSS than in LSS. These results indicate that the attention controlling system, supported by ACC, is more effective in HSS compared to that of LSS.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667855     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00032-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  57 in total

1.  Electroencephalogram and heart rate measures of working memory at 5 and 10 months of age.

Authors:  Kimberly Cuevas; Martha Ann Bell; Stuart Marcovitch; Susan D Calkins
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12

2.  Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; My Van Au Duong; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Danielle Ibarrola; Irina Malikova; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Elisabeth Soulier; Patrick Viout; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick J Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Jamison D Fargo; Sarah Schwartz; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Neural bases of focusing attention in working memory: an fMRI study based on group differences.

Authors:  Mariko Osaka; Mie Komori; Masanao Morishita; Naoyuki Osaka
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.

Authors:  Doris Keye; Oliver Wilhelm; Klaus Oberauer; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

Review 7.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 8.  [Executive functions in patients with depression. The role of prefrontal activation].

Authors:  N Vasic; R C Wolf; H Walter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.

Authors:  Brooke N Macnamara; Adam B Moore; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

10.  Individual Variability in Brain Activity: A Nuisance or an Opportunity?

Authors:  John Darrell Van Horn; Scott T Grafton; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.