Literature DB >> 24661900

Infant robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery.

Danesh Bansal1, Nicholas G Cost1, Christopher M Bean1, Brian A Vanderbrink1, Marion Schulte1, Paul H Noh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the outcomes of infant robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) upper urinary tract reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all infants who underwent RAL upper urinary tract reconstruction were reviewed. Patients less than 1 year of age at surgery were included. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic usage, and complications were reviewed.
RESULTS: Ten infants met the study criteria. There were five right and five left-sided procedures. Eight pyeloplasties (4 right, 4 left) and two ureteroureterostomies (1 right single system, 1 left duplex system) were performed. The median age was 8 months (range 3-12 months). Median weight was 7.7 kg (range 5.8-10.9 kg). Median operative time was 128 min (range 95-205 min). There was no significant blood loss or intraoperative complications. One (10%) patient received a regional block. Eight (80%) patients did not receive postoperative narcotics. Median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-2). Median follow-up was 10 months (range 3-18 months). Complications included one urinary leak, one ileus, and one urinary tract infection. Hydronephrosis improved in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Infant RAL upper urinary tract reconstruction is technically feasible, safe, and effective. It can be applied for duplication anomalies and single system obstructions in infants.
Copyright © 2014 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant; Pediatrics; Pyeloplasty; Robotics; Ureteroureterostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661900     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  8 in total

1.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Paediatric robotic surgery.

Authors:  Joshua Cave; Simon Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series.

Authors:  Kentaro Mizuno; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Satoshi Kurokawa; Hideyuki Kamisawa; Hidenori Nishio; Yoshinobu Moritoki; Akihiro Nakane; Tetsuji Maruyama; Atsushi Okada; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri; Takahiro Yasui; Yutaro Hayashi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-08-06

Review 5.  Single-Site Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology.

Authors:  Diana K Bowen; Jason P Van Batavia; Arun K Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chan; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Renea M Sturm; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 7.  Pyeloplasty techniques using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Francesco Turrà; Maria Escolino; Alessandra Farina; Alessandro Settimi; Ciro Esposito; François Varlet
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

Review 8.  Robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Adam Howe; Zachary Kozel; Lane Palmer
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.