Literature DB >> 27495150

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison between pediatric and adult patients-Japanese series.

Kentaro Mizuno1, Yoshiyuki Kojima2, Satoshi Kurokawa1, Hideyuki Kamisawa1, Hidenori Nishio1, Yoshinobu Moritoki1, Akihiro Nakane1, Tetsuji Maruyama1, Atsushi Okada1, Noriyasu Kawai1, Keiichi Tozawa1, Kenjiro Kohri1, Takahiro Yasui1, Yutaro Hayashi3.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted procedures are gaining traction as a viable form of minimally invasive surgery in the field of reconstructive surgery. In this article, the aim is to present our initial experience and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P). We performed RAL-P in 22 patients for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction between December 2012 and August 2015. The da Vinci® S surgical system was utilized for all cases. All procedures were performed via a transperitoneal approach. We assessed perioperative outcomes, and furthermore, compared between pediatric and adult patients undergoing this procedure. Dismembered procedures were performed in 19 patients. Three patients underwent Y-V plasty, and two patients who experienced failure during the primary pyeloplasty had to undergo reoperation. Although the console time for pediatric patients was significantly shorter than that of adults (123.1 ± 18.3, 162.4 ± 23.9 min, respectively, p < 0.001), success rate was not significantly different between pediatric and adults (100 vs 90 %, p = 0.512). According to a comparison of surgical outcomes by age, the console time was significantly shorter in pediatric than in adult patients. This finding may be attributable to the differences in intraabdominal fatty tissues. Besides, RAL-P with Y-V plasty was applicable even for cases of failed pyeloplasty. In conclusion, the surgical outcomes of RAL-P were favorable and safe for both pediatric and adult patients, and comparable to findings of previous reports. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a case series of RAL-P in Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydronephrosis; Pediatric; Robotic pyeloplasty; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27495150     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0633-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  29 in total

Review 1.  The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Current controversies in pediatric urologic robotic surgery.

Authors:  Lorenzo F M Trevisani; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Ben E Niver; Ilir Agalliu; Romy Bareket; Patrick Mufarrij; Ojas Shah; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; M T Grune; L V Tecuanhuey; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Tomasz Szydełko; Jarosław Kasprzak; Jarosław Lewandowski; Wojciech Apoznański; Janusz Dembowski
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Steven M Lucas; Chandru P Sundaram; J Stuart Wolf; Raymond J Leveillee; Vincent G Bird; Mohamed Aziz; Stephen E Pautler; Patrick Luke; Peter Erdeljan; D Duane Baldwin; Kamyar Ebrahimi; Robert B Nadler; David Rebuck; Raju Thomas; Benjamin R Lee; Ugur Boylu; Robert S Figenshau; Ravi Munver; Timothy D Averch; Bishoy Gayed; Arieh L Shalhav; Mohan S Gundeti; Erik P Castle; J Kyle Anderson; Branden G Duffey; Jaime Landman; Zhamshid Okhunov; Carson Wong; Kurt H Strom
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  C A Peters; R N Schlussel; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in obese and non-obese patients.

Authors:  Bruce W Lindgren; Brendan T Frainey; Earl Y Cheng; Elizabeth B Yerkes; Edward M Gong
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Emilie K Johnson; Curtis Clark; Benjamin I Chung; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Infant robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Danesh Bansal; Nicholas G Cost; Christopher M Bean; Brian A Vanderbrink; Marion Schulte; Paul H Noh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  2 in total

1.  New steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the extraperitoneal approach: a propensity-score matched comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurokawa; Yukihiro Umemoto; Kentaro Mizuno; Atsushi Okada; Akihiro Nakane; Hidenori Nishio; Shuzo Hamamoto; Ryosuke Ando; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  A Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Pediatric and Adult Patients: Does Age Matter?

Authors:  Bosik Kang; Jungyo Suh; Bumjin Lim; Kun Suk Kim; Sang Hoon Song
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.