Diana K Bowen1, Jason P Van Batavia1, Arun K Srinivasan2. 1. Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Wood Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 2. Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Wood Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. srinivasanA3@email.chop.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we summarize research that has evaluated the role of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic surgery in pediatric urology, highlighting new and/or controversial ideas. RECENT FINDINGS: The newest research developments over the last several years are studies that address generalizability of these techniques, ideal patient factors, extrapolation to more complex surgeries, and comparative studies to more traditional techniques to define the associated costs and benefits, as well as patient-centered outcomes. Specifically in the field of LESS, addressing the limitations of suboptimal vision, instrument crowding, and loss of triangulation have been a focus. The literature is now replete with new applications for robotic surgery as well as descriptions of the specific technical challenges inherent to pediatrics. Robotic surgery and LESS are areas of growth in pediatric urology that allow continual innovation and expansion of technology within a surgeon's armamentarium.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we summarize research that has evaluated the role of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic surgery in pediatric urology, highlighting new and/or controversial ideas. RECENT FINDINGS: The newest research developments over the last several years are studies that address generalizability of these techniques, ideal patient factors, extrapolation to more complex surgeries, and comparative studies to more traditional techniques to define the associated costs and benefits, as well as patient-centered outcomes. Specifically in the field of LESS, addressing the limitations of suboptimal vision, instrument crowding, and loss of triangulation have been a focus. The literature is now replete with new applications for robotic surgery as well as descriptions of the specific technical challenges inherent to pediatrics. Robotic surgery and LESS are areas of growth in pediatric urology that allow continual innovation and expansion of technology within a surgeon's armamentarium.
Entities:
Keywords:
LESS; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Pediatric urology; Robotic surgery
Authors: Daniel I Avery; Katherine W Herbst; Thomas S Lendvay; Paul H Noh; Pankaj Dangle; Mohan S Gundeti; Matthew C Steele; Sean T Corbett; Craig A Peters; Christina Kim Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Angela M Arlen; Kristin M Broderick; Curtis Travers; Edwin A Smith; James M Elmore; Andrew J Kirsch Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Michael J Biles; Julia B Finkelstein; Mark V Silva; Sarah M Lambert; Pasquale Casale Journal: J Endourol Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: G M Grimsby; M A Keays; C Villanueva; N C Bush; W T Snodgrass; P C Gargollo; M A Jacobs Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Danesh Bansal; Nicholas G Cost; Christopher M Bean; Brian A Vanderbrink; Marion Schulte; Paul H Noh Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Andreas Meinzer; Ibrahim Alkatout; Thomas Franz Krebs; Jonas Baastrup; Katja Reischig; Roberts Meiksans; Robert Bergholz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 4.241