Literature DB >> 10824643

Prediction of fat and fat-free mass in male athletes using dual X-ray absorptiometry as the reference method.

A D Stewart1, W J Hannan.   

Abstract

The ability of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry to predict fat mass and fat-free mass was compared in a sample of 82 male athletes from a wide variety of sports, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. The percent fat measured by DXA was 10.9+/-4.9% (mean +/- s), and fat mass was predicted with a standard error of the estimate of 1.7 kg for skinfolds and 2.8 kg for bioelectrical impedance analysis (P < 0.001). Fat-free mass was predicted with a standard error of the estimate of 1.7 kg for anthropometry and 2.6 kg for bioelectrical impedance analysis (P < 0.001). Regression of various individual skinfolds and summed skinfolds, to examine the effect of skinfold selection combinations by stepwise regression, produced an optimal fat mass prediction using the thigh and abdominal skinfold sites, and an optimal fat-free mass prediction using the thigh, abdominal and supra-ilium sites. These results suggest that anthropometry offers a better way of assessing body composition in athletes than bioelectrical impedance analysis. Applying the derived equations to a separate sample of 24 athletes predicted fat and fat-free mass with a total error of 2.3 kg (2.9%) and 2.2 kg (2.7%), respectively. Combining the samples introduced more heterogeneity into the sample (n = 106), and the optimal prediction of fat mass used six skinfolds in producing a similar standard error of the estimate (1.7 kg), although this explained a further 4% of the variation in DXA-derived fat. Fat-free mass was predicted best from four skinfolds, although the standard error of the estimate and coefficient of determination were unchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10824643     DOI: 10.1080/026404100365009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  25 in total

Review 1.  Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission.

Authors:  Timothy R Ackland; Timothy G Lohman; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Ronald J Maughan; Nanna L Meyer; Arthur D Stewart; Wolfram Müller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: safe weight loss and maintenance practices in sport and exercise.

Authors:  Paula Sammarone Turocy; Bernard F DePalma; Craig A Horswill; Kathleen M Laquale; Thomas J Martin; Arlette C Perry; Marla J Somova; Alan C Utter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  No case of exercise-associated hyponatraemia in top male ultra-endurance cyclists: the 'Swiss Cycling Marathon'.

Authors:  Christoph Alexander Rüst; Beat Knechtle; Patrizia Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Osteocalcin as a negative regulator of serum leptin concentration in humans: insight from triathlon competitions.

Authors:  Amelia Guadalupe-Grau; Ignacio Ara; Cecilia Dorado; German Vicente-Rodríguez; Jorge Perez-Gomez; Javier Chavarren Cabrero; José A Serrano-Sanchez; Alfredo Santana; Jose A L Calbet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Quantification of lean bodyweight.

Authors:  Sarayut Janmahasatian; Stephen B Duffull; Susan Ash; Leigh C Ward; Nuala M Byrne; Bruce Green
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Higher prevalence of exercise-associated hyponatremia in female than in male open-water ultra-endurance swimmers: the 'Marathon-Swim' in Lake Zurich.

Authors:  Sandra Wagner; Beat Knechtle; Patrizia Knechtle; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  A comparison of three bioelectrical impedance analyses for predicting lean body mass in a population with a large difference in muscularity.

Authors:  Noriko Ishiguro; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Masae Miyatani; Yoshihisa Masuo; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement in male and female athletes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Pineau; Jean Robert Filliard; Michel Bocquet
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Ad libitum fluid intake leads to no leg swelling in male Ironman triathletes - an observational field study.

Authors:  Michael Meyer; Beat Knechtle; Jolanda Bürge; Patrizia Knechtle; Claudia Mrazek; Andrea Wirth; Birte Ellenrieder; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Changes in Skinfold Thicknesses and Body Fat in Ultra-endurance Cyclists.

Authors:  Martin Bischof; Beat Knechtle; Christoph A Rüst; Patrizia Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.