Literature DB >> 34762020

Age effects on category learning, categorical perception, and generalization.

Caitlin R Bowman1,2, Stefania R Ashby1, Dagmar Zeithamova1.   

Abstract

Age deficits in memory for individual episodes are well established. Less is known about how age affects another key memory function: the ability to form new conceptual knowledge. Here we studied age differences in concept formation in a category-learning paradigm with face-blend stimuli, using several metrics: direct learning of category members presented during training, generalisation of category labels to new examples, and shifts in perceived similarity between category members that often follow category learning. We found that older adults were impaired in direct learning of training examples, but that there was no significant age deficit in generalisation once we accounted for the deficit in direct learning. We also found that category learning affected the perceived similarity between members of the same versus opposing categories, and age did not significantly moderate this effect. Lastly, we compared traditional category learning to categorisation after a learning task in which a category label (shared last name) was presented alongside stimulus-specific information (unique first names that individuated category members). We found that simultaneously learning stimulus-specific and category information resulted in decreased category learning, and that this decrement was apparent in both age groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; associative memory; categorical perception; category learning; generalisation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34762020      PMCID: PMC9091050          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.2003818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  73 in total

1.  A quantitative model-based approach to examining aging effects on information-integration category learning.

Authors:  J Vincent Filoteo; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-03

Review 2.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Response bias and aging on a recognition memory task.

Authors:  Terri J Huh; Joel H Kramer; Adam Gazzaley; Dean C Delis
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; William Aue; Aslı Kılıç
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Effects of stimulus integrality on visual attention in older and younger adults: a quantitative model-based analysis.

Authors:  W T Maddox; J V Filoteo; J R Huntington
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

6.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination.

Authors:  R Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

7.  Hyper-binding: a unique age effect.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Lynn Hasher; Ruthann C Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-19

8.  Normal aging and the dissociable prototype learning systems.

Authors:  Brian D Glass; Tanya Chotibut; Jennifer Pacheco; David M Schnyer; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-29

9.  Category learning strategies in younger and older adults: Rule abstraction and memorization.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Mark A McDaniel; Jeri L Little
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition.

Authors:  Daniel B Wright; Benjamin Sladden
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Understanding associative false memories in aging using multivariate analyses.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Amy A Overman; Catherine M Carpenter; Courtney R Gerver
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Category-Biased Neural Representations Form Spontaneously during Learning That Emphasizes Memory for Specific Instances.

Authors:  Stefania R Ashby; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.709

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.