Literature DB >> 24659866

Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Jae Young Jang1, Hoon Jai Chun1.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the principal investigative procedure for colorectal neoplasms because it can detect and remove most precancerous lesions. The effectiveness of colonoscopy depends on the quality of the examination. Bowel preparation is an essential part of high-quality colonoscopies because only an optimal colonic cleansing allows the colonoscopist to clearly view the entire colonic mucosa and to identify any polyps or other lesions. Suboptimal bowel preparation not only prolongs the overall procedure time, decreases the cecal intubation rate, and increases the costs associated with colonoscopy but also increases the risk of missing polyps or adenomas during the colonoscopy. Therefore, a repeat examination or a shorter colonoscopy follow-up interval may be suitable strategies for a patient with suboptimal bowel preparation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bower preparation; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasm; Quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24659866      PMCID: PMC3961991          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John H Bond; Sidney Winawer; Theodore R Levin; Randall W Burt; David A Johnson; Lynne M Kirk; Scott Litlin; David A Lieberman; Jerome D Waye; James Church; John B Marshall; Robert H Riddell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas B Nelson; Kenneth R McQuaid; John H Bond; David A Lieberman; David G Weiss; Tiina K Johnston
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  W H Kim; Y J Cho; J Y Park; P K Min; J K Kang; I S Park
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.

Authors:  S Tsuda; B Veress; E Tóth; F-T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Virender K Sharma; Pat de Garmo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer.

Authors:  O Hosokawa; S Shirasaki; Y Kaizaki; H Hayashi; K Douden; M Hattori
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cristina C Rutherford; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

Review 2.  Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Authors:  Ulrike W Denzer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 4.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Training in Endoscopy: Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Jang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-07-31

6.  Factors Affecting Cecal Intubation Time in Colonoscopy: Impact of Obesity.

Authors:  Beslen Goksoy; Mevlut Kiyak; Mehmet Karadag; Gokhan Yilmaz; Ibrahim F Azamat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  Comparison of claims data on hospitalization rates and repeat procedures in patients receiving a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lisa E Young; Naomi C Sacks; Philip L Cyr; Abhishek Sharma; David N Dahdal
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-08-31

8.  Split- versus single-dose preparation tolerability in a multiethnic population: decreased side effects but greater social barriers.

Authors:  Gabriel Perreault; Adam Goodman; Sebastian Larion; Ahana Sen; Kirsten Quiles; Michael Poles; Renee Williams
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  Bowel preparation quality between hospitalized patients and outpatient colonoscopies.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Othman Alharbi; Nahla Azzam; Mohannad Altayeb; Salem Thaniah; Abdulrahman Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  A short telephone-call reminder improves bowel preparation, quality indicators and patient satisfaction with first colonoscopy.

Authors:  Marisol Gálvez; Angel Mario Zarate; Hector Espino; Fátima Higuera-de la Tijera; Richard Alexander Awad; Santiago Camacho
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.