Literature DB >> 11868001

Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.

Douglas B Nelson1, Kenneth R McQuaid, John H Bond, David A Lieberman, David G Weiss, Tiina K Johnston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indirect evidence and modeling analyses suggest that colonoscopy may be the most cost-effective way to screen the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia. However, the success and safety of primary colonoscopic screening has not been prospectively evaluated in a multicenter trial.
METHODS: Asymptomatic subjects age 50 to 75 years who had not undergone examination of the colon within 10 years were recruited from the general medicine clinics of 13 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Eligible patients underwent colonoscopy by study coinvestigators, at which time all polyps were measured, photographed, and removed. Patients were contacted at 24 hours and 1 week to track procedure-related complications.
RESULTS: Primary screening colonoscopy was performed in a cohort of 3196 asymptomatic subjects. A "good" preparation was reported in 81% of patients, and colonoscopy to the cecum was successful in 97.2% of cases. Mean insertion time to the cecum and total procedure times were 10.5 (8.7) and 30.6 (19.1) minutes, respectively. No preprocedural patient characteristics were identified that were predictive of an incomplete procedure. At least one polyp was resected in 1672 patients. There was no perforation and no death attributed to colonoscopy. Major morbidity considered to be definitely related to colonoscopy occurred in 9 of 3196 procedures (0.3%): lower GI bleeding requiring intervention (6), myocardial infarction and/or cerebrovascular accident (2), and thrombophlebitis (1). In subjects undergoing only diagnostic procedures, the major complication rate was 0.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy can be performed in multiple centers with a high degree of success and safety in large numbers of asymptomatic, average-risk men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11868001     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.121883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  107 in total

1.  A snapshot of colonoscopy practice in England: stimulus for improvement.

Authors:  K Palmer; A I Morris
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?

Authors:  Maria Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Rossella Cianci; Alessandra Bizzotto; Cristiano Spada; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

3.  Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jin Yong Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Emilio Brocchi; Eugene B Chang; Wei-Chih Liao; Takeshi Mizukami; Melvin Schapiro; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03-16

Review 5.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Update on preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen W Landreneau; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-10

7.  Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid El Chafic; George Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Felippe O Marcondes; Katie M Dean; Robert E Schoen; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Michele Morris; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.