Literature DB >> 28894587

Comparison of claims data on hospitalization rates and repeat procedures in patients receiving a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

Lisa E Young1, Naomi C Sacks2,3, Philip L Cyr2,4, Abhishek Sharma2,5, David N Dahdal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes of colorectal screening using sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate compared with other prescription bowel-preparation agents. Primary endpoints were rates of procedure-associated hospitalizations, diagnosis at hospitalization, and rates of early repeat screenings.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients using the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases, which contain fully adjudicated, de-identified, medical- and prescription-drug claims, as well as demographic and enrollment information for individuals with commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare supplemental insurance coverage. Patients who had a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy over a 3-year period were identified using International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification procedure codes, recorded on claims from physicians and facilities. First, screening colonoscopy was identified for each patient, and the study was limited to those patients who could be observed for ≥6 months before and 3 months after the screening procedure. Total number of hospitalizations and rates of early repeat screenings were evaluated for all patients who received sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate and compared with those who received other bowel-preparation agents. Individual prescription medications that could affect the outcome of the cleansing agent were identified; further evaluations were made to establish whether patients had comorbid conditions, such as chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or psychiatric illness. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, two-tailed t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 566,628 procedures were identified in the MarketScan databases and included in the study. Sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate performed well in terms of safety outcomes, with no hospitalizations due to diagnosis of hyponatremia, dehydration, or other fluid disorders in the 10 days after procedure. Early repeat rates among sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate patients were comparable with rates observed for all other cleansing agents.
CONCLUSION: Outcomes of colorectal screening using sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate were not significantly different compared with other prescription bowel-preparation agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel preparation; Prepopik; colonoscopy preparation; colorectal cancer screening; health economics; health insurance; outcomes research; sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894587      PMCID: PMC5582656          DOI: 10.1177/2050312117727999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAGE Open Med        ISSN: 2050-3121


  29 in total

1.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Projections of the costs associated with colorectal cancer care in the United States, 2000-2020.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Angela B Mariotto; Eric Feuer; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Marion Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy Atkin; Subash B Duggirala; Robert Fletcher; Seth N Glick; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; David Ransohoff; Douglas Rex; Robert Schoen; Paul Schroy; Sidney Winawer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing.

Authors:  R V Bryant; S N Schoeman; M N Schoeman
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.048

5.  Split-dose picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid solution markedly enhances colon cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer A Flemming; Stephen J Vanner; Lawrence C Hookey
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Hyponatremia and sodium picosulfate bowel preparations in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew A Weir; Jamie L Fleet; Chris Vinden; Salimah Z Shariff; Kuan Liu; Haoyuan Song; Arsh K Jain; Sonja Gandhi; William F Clark; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.

Authors:  Philip O Katz; Douglas K Rex; Michael Epstein; Nav K Grandhi; Stephen Vanner; Lawrence C Hookey; Vivian Alderfer; Raymond E Joseph
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  2 in total

1.  Real-world comparison of the effectiveness and safety of different bowel preparation agents.

Authors:  Naomi C Sacks; Abhishek Sharma; Philip L Cyr; Gerald Bertiger; David N Dahdal; Stuart P Brogadir
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-16

2.  Colonoscopy: Preparation and Potential Complications.

Authors:  Wojciech Latos; David Aebisher; Magdalena Latos; Magdalena Krupka-Olek; Klaudia Dynarowicz; Ewa Chodurek; Grzegorz Cieślar; Aleksandra Kawczyk-Krupka
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.