Literature DB >> 18658067

Maturation of visual and auditory temporal processing in school-aged children.

Piers Dawes1, Dorothy V M Bishop.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine development of sensitivity to auditory and visual temporal processes in children and the association with standardized measures of auditory processing and communication. Methods Normative data on tests of visual and auditory processing were collected on 18 adults and 98 children aged 6-10 years of age. Auditory processes included detection of pitch from temporal cues using iterated rippled noise and frequency modulation detection at 2 Hz, 40 Hz, and 240 Hz. Visual processes were coherent form and coherent motion detection. Test-retest data were gathered on 21 children.
RESULTS: Performance on perceptual tasks improved with age, except for fine temporal processing (iterated rippled noise) and coherent form perception, both of which were relatively stable over the age range. Within-subject variability (as assessed by track width) did not account for age-related change. There was no evidence for a common temporal processing factor, and there were no significant associations between perceptual task performance and communication level (Children's Communication Checklist, 2nd ed.; D. V. M. Bishop, 2003) or speech-based auditory processing (SCAN-C; R. W. Keith, 2000).
CONCLUSIONS: The auditory tasks had different developmental trajectories despite a common procedure, indicating that age-related change was not solely due to responsiveness to task demands. The 2-Hz frequency modulation detection task, previously used in dyslexia research, and the visual tasks had low reliability compared to other measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658067     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/073)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  23 in total

1.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

2.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

3.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

Review 5.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Maturation of auditory temporal integration and inhibition assessed with event-related potentials (ERPs).

Authors:  Allison M Fox; Mike Anderson; Corinne Reid; Tim Smith; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 7.  Tuning up the developing auditory CNS.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Amplitude Modulation Detection in Children with a History of Temporary Conductive Hearing Loss Remains Impaired for Years After Restoration of Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Margo McKenna Benoit; Mark Orlando; Kenneth Henry; Paul Allen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-17

10.  Abnormal auditory ERP N100 in children with dyslexia: comparison with their control siblings.

Authors:  Charalabos Papageorgiou; Giorgos A Giannakakis; Konstantina S Nikita; Dimitris Anagnostopoulos; George N Papadimitriou; Andreas Rabavilas
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.