Literature DB >> 24657667

Shock wave lithotripsy targeting of the kidney and pancreas does not increase the severity of metabolic syndrome in a porcine model.

Rajash K Handa1, Andrew P Evan2, Bret A Connors2, Cynthia D Johnson2, Ziyue Liu3, Mouhamad Alloosh4, Michael Sturek4, Carmella Evans-Molina5, Jessica A Mandeville6, Ehud Gnessin6, James E Lingeman6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether shock wave lithotripsy of the kidney of pigs with metabolic syndrome would worsen glucose tolerance or increase the risk of diabetes mellitus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine-month-old female Ossabaw miniature pigs were fed a hypercaloric atherogenic diet to induce metabolic syndrome. At age 15 months the pigs were treated with 2,000 or 4,000 shock waves (24 kV at 120 shock waves per minute) using an unmodified HM3 lithotripter (Dornier MedTech, Kennesaw, Georgia). Shock waves were targeted to the left kidney upper pole calyx to model treatment that would also expose the pancreatic tail to shock waves. The intravenous glucose tolerance test was done in conscious fasting pigs before lithotripsy, and 1 and 2 months after lithotripsy with blood samples taken for glucose and insulin measurement.
RESULTS: Pigs fed the hypercaloric atherogenic diet were obese, dyslipidemic, insulin resistant and glucose intolerant, consistent with metabolic syndrome. Assessments of insulin resistance, glucose tolerance and pancreatic β cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, and the glucose and insulin response profile to the intravenous glucose tolerance test were similar before and after lithotripsy.
CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic syndrome status of pigs treated with shock wave lithotripsy was unchanged 2 months after kidney treatment with 2,000 high amplitude shock waves or overtreatment with 4,000 high amplitude shock waves. These findings do not support a single shock wave lithotripsy treatment of the kidney as a risk factor for the onset of diabetes mellitus.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes mellitus; kidney; lithotripsy; metabolic syndrome X; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24657667      PMCID: PMC4168006          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Dean G Assimos; Peter Alken; Colin Buck; Michele Gallucci; Thomas Knoll; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret Sue Pearle; Kemal Sarica; Christian Türk; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Evaluation of different methods for assessment of insulin sensitivity in Gottingen minipigs: introduction of a new, simpler method.

Authors:  Berit Christoffersen; Ulla Ribel; Kirsten Raun; Valeria Golozoubova; Giovanni Pacini
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Acute necrotizing pancreatitis as a rare complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Feza Karakayali; Sinasi Sevmiş; Ibrahim Ayvaz; Ilteriş Tekin; Fatih Boyvat; Gökhan Moray
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  C Weyer; C Bogardus; D M Mott; R E Pratley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Shockwave lithotripsy: dose-related effects on renal structure, hemodynamics, and tubular function.

Authors:  Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; Philip M Blomgren; J Howard Pratt; Naomi S Fineberg; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones is not associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Sato; Hitoshi Tanda; Shuji Kato; Shigeki Ohnishi; Hisao Nakajima; Akihito Nanbu; Toshikazu Nitta; Mikio Koroku; Keigo Akagashi; Tatsuo Hanzawa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Nutritional model of steatohepatitis and metabolic syndrome in the Ossabaw miniature swine.

Authors:  Lydia Lee; Mouhamad Alloosh; Romil Saxena; William Van Alstine; Bruce A Watkins; James E Klaunig; Michael Sturek; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Divergent compensatory responses to high-fat diet between C57BL6/J and C57BLKS/J inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Emily K Sims; Masayuki Hatanaka; David L Morris; Sarah A Tersey; Tatsuyoshi Kono; Zunaira Z Chaudry; Kathleen H Day; Dan R Moss; Natalie D Stull; Raghavendra G Mirmira; Carmella Evans-Molina
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.310

10.  The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pancreatic enzymes.

Authors:  Z Kirkali; G Kirkali; S Tanci; Y Tahiri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of renal shock wave lithotripsy on the development of metabolic syndrome in a juvenile swine model: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Ziyue Liu; Bret A Connors; Mouhamad Alloosh; David P Basile; Johnathan D Tune; Michael Sturek; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Shock wave lithotripsy does not impair renal function in a Swine model of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Cynthia D Johnson; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Carrie L Phillips; Ziyue Liu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Intraluminal measurement of papillary duct urine pH, in vivo: a pilot study in the swine kidney.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Sharon B Bledsoe; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.