Literature DB >> 25245490

Effect of renal shock wave lithotripsy on the development of metabolic syndrome in a juvenile swine model: a pilot study.

Rajash K Handa1, Ziyue Liu2, Bret A Connors3, Mouhamad Alloosh4, David P Basile4, Johnathan D Tune4, Michael Sturek4, Andrew P Evan3, James E Lingeman5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a pilot study to assess whether renal shock wave lithotripsy influences metabolic syndrome onset and severity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-month-old juvenile female Ossabaw miniature pigs were treated with shock wave lithotripsy (2,000 shock waves at 24 kV with 120 shock waves per minute in 2) or sham shock wave lithotripsy (no shock waves in 2). Shock waves were targeted to the upper pole of the left kidney to model treatment that would also expose the pancreatic tail to shock waves. Pigs were then instrumented to directly measure arterial blood pressure via an implanted radiotelemetry device. They later received a hypercaloric atherogenic diet for about 7 months. Metabolic syndrome development was assessed by the intravenous glucose tolerance test.
RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome progression and severity were similar in the sham treated and lithotripsy groups. The only exception arterial blood pressure, which remained relatively constant in sham treated pigs but began to increase at about 2 months towards hypertensive levels in lithotripsy treated pigs. Metabolic data on the 2 groups were pooled to provide a more complete assessment of metabolic syndrome development and progression in this juvenile pig model. The intravenous glucose tolerance test revealed substantial insulin resistance with impaired glucose tolerance within 2 months on the hypercaloric atherogenic diet with signs of further metabolic impairment at 7 months.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that renal shock wave lithotripsy is not a risk factor for worsening glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus onset. However, it appears to be a risk factor for early onset hypertension in metabolic syndrome.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertension; kidney; lithotripsy; metabolic syndrome X; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245490      PMCID: PMC4369464          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

1.  Management of lower-pole caliceal stones.

Authors:  Glenn S Gerber
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Cui Yu; Liu Longfei; Wang Long; Zeng Feng; Niu Jiping; Li Mao; Qi Lin; Chen Hequn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy targeting of the kidney and pancreas does not increase the severity of metabolic syndrome in a porcine model.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson; Ziyue Liu; Mouhamad Alloosh; Michael Sturek; Carmella Evans-Molina; Jessica A Mandeville; Ehud Gnessin; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Are we estimating the adverse effects of shock-wave lithotripsy on a faulty scale?

Authors:  Davor Eterović; Marijan Situm; Vinko Marković; Krunoslav Kuna; Ante Punda
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Shock wave lithotripsy and diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mitra de Cógáin; Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Razvi; Andrew Fuller; Linda Nott; Carlos E Méndez-Probst; Rasmus Leistner; Kirsten Foell; Sumit Davé; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A minipig model of high-fat/high-sucrose diet-induced diabetes and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Shoumin Xi; Weidong Yin; Zongbao Wang; Masataka Kusunoki; Xin Lian; Tomonari Koike; Jianglin Fan; Qiuju Zhang
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Are there long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in paediatric patients?

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Bassam A Awad; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Mohamed E Abou El-Ghar; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud R El-Kenawy; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  The young Göttingen minipig as a model of childhood and adolescent obesity: influence of diet and gender.

Authors:  Berit Christoffersen; Valeria Golozoubova; Giovanni Pacini; Ove Svendsen; Kirsten Raun
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of metabolic syndrome and aging on Ca2+ dysfunction in coronary smooth muscle and coronary artery disease severity in Ossabaw miniature swine.

Authors:  Jill K Badin; Rebecca S Bruning; Michael Sturek
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Intraluminal measurement of papillary duct urine pH, in vivo: a pilot study in the swine kidney.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Sharon B Bledsoe; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.