Literature DB >> 19710388

Evaluation of different methods for assessment of insulin sensitivity in Gottingen minipigs: introduction of a new, simpler method.

Berit Christoffersen1, Ulla Ribel, Kirsten Raun, Valeria Golozoubova, Giovanni Pacini.   

Abstract

The use of animal models in diabetes research requires reliable tests for evaluation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Minipigs are being increasingly used in metabolic research, and the aim of this study was to compare different tests and indexes for evaluation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in Göttingen minipigs. Hyperinsulinemic, isoglycemic clamp, intravenous (IVGTT) and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), and a modified insulin tolerance test were performed in minipigs fed either low- or high-energy diet. Furthermore, the reproducibility of IVGTT-derived parameters was assessed. Previously described insulin sensitivity indexes [steady-state glucose infusion rate/glucose concentration/insulin concentration from clamp (M/G/I); oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS) and ISI(comp) from OGTT; S(I) from minimal model analysis of IVGTT; and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index from fasting values] were calculated together with an insulin sensitivity index from the modified insulin tolerance test (ISI(ITT)) and a new simple index (S2) derived from the first 30 min of the IVGTT. beta-Cell function was assessed from the IVGTT and the OGTT. Reproducibility of the IVGTT-derived parameters was calculated as median intraindividual coefficient of variation (CV%).M/G/I correlated significantly only with S2 (P < 0.05, r = 0.54). S2 furthermore correlated with S(I) (P < 0.001, r = 0.81), ISI(ITT) (P < 0.001, r = 0.57), and the two indexes from OGTT, ISI(comp) (P < 0.001, r = 0.78) and OGIS (p < 0.05, r = 0.48). No correlation was found between beta-cell function indexes from OGTT and IVGTT. The median CV% of the new S2 index was 13. In conclusion, the new simple index of insulin sensitivity, S2, was revealed to be useful for evaluation of insulin sensitivity in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19710388     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.90851.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  13 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy targeting of the kidney and pancreas does not increase the severity of metabolic syndrome in a porcine model.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson; Ziyue Liu; Mouhamad Alloosh; Michael Sturek; Carmella Evans-Molina; Jessica A Mandeville; Ehud Gnessin; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Dietary conjugated α-linolenic acid did not improve glucose tolerance in a neonatal pig model.

Authors:  Christian-Alexandre Castellano; Jean-Patrice Baillargeon; Mélanie Plourde; Sandie I Briand; Paul Angers; Alain Giguère; J Jacques Matte
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Metabolic adaptations to HFHS overfeeding: how whole body and tissues postprandial metabolic flexibility adapt in Yucatan mini-pigs.

Authors:  Sergio Polakof; Didier Rémond; Annick Bernalier-Donadille; Mathieu Rambeau; Estelle Pujos-Guillot; Blandine Comte; Dominique Dardevet; Isabelle Savary-Auzeloux
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Functional network analysis of obese and lean Göttingen minipigs elucidates changes in oxidative and inflammatory networks in obese pigs.

Authors:  Harrie C M Boonen; Sophia G Moesgaard; Malene M Birck; Berit O Christoffersen; Susanna Cirera; Peter M H Heegaard; Tina Rødgaard Højbøge; Lars J Jensen; Alan Mortensen; Lisbeth Høier Olsen; Majid Sheykhzade; Jiaowei Tang; Jens Lykkesfeldt
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Determining insulin sensitivity from glucose tolerance tests in Iberian and landrace pigs.

Authors:  José Miguel Rodríguez-López; Manuel Lachica; Lucrecia González-Valero; Ignacio Fernández-Fígares
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Animal Models and Alternatives in Vaginal Research: a Comparative Review.

Authors:  Jennifer M McCracken; Gisele A Calderon; Andrew J Robinson; Courtney N Sullivan; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez; Julie C E Hakim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in cardiac and vascular remodeling in a novel minipig model of insulin resistance and atherosclerosis induced by consumption of a high-fat/cholesterol diet.

Authors:  Pan Yongming; Cai Zhaowei; Ma Yichao; Zhu Keyan; Chen Liang; Chen Fangming; Xu Xiaoping; Ma Quanxin; Chen Minli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  Oxidized LDL and Fructosamine Associated with Severity of Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis in Insulin Resistant Pigs Fed a High Fat/High NaCl Diet.

Authors:  Timothy C Nichols; Elizabeth P Merricks; Dwight A Bellinger; Robin A Raymer; Jing Yu; Diana Lam; Gary G Koch; Walker H Busby; David R Clemmons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Chronic Consumption of Sugar-Enriched Diets on Brain Metabolism and Insulin Sensitivity in Adult Yucatan Minipigs.

Authors:  Melissa Ochoa; Charles-Henri Malbert; Paul Meurice; David Val-Laillet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Haplotypes on pig chromosome 3 distinguish metabolically healthy from unhealthy obese individuals.

Authors:  Simona D Frederiksen; Peter Karlskov-Mortensen; Sameer D Pant; Maryse Guerin; Philippe Lesnik; Claus B Jørgensen; Susanna Cirera; Camilla S Bruun; Thomas Mark; Merete Fredholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.