Literature DB >> 24656953

Variations in cereal volume affect the amount selected and eaten for breakfast.

Barbara J Rolls, Jennifer S Meengs, Liane S Roe.   

Abstract

Food volume could influence both the portions that people take and the amount that they eat, but these effects have had little investigation. The influence of food volume was tested by systematically reducing the flake size of a breakfast cereal so that the cereal was more compact and the same weight filled a smaller volume. In a crossover design, 41 adults ate cereal for breakfast once a week for 4 weeks during 2011 and 2012. The cereal was either standard wheat flakes or the same cereal crushed to reduce the volume to 80%, 60%, or 40% of the standard. A constant weight of cereal was provided in an opaque container and participants poured the amount they wanted into a bowl, added fat-free milk and noncalorie sweetener as desired, and consumed as much as they wanted. Results from a mixed linear model showed that as flake size was reduced, subjects poured a smaller volume of cereal, but still took a greater amount by weight and energy content (both P values <0.0001). Despite these differences, subjects estimated that they had taken a similar number of calories of all versions of the cereal. They ate most of the cereal they took, so as flake size was reduced, breakfast energy intake increased from a mean±standard error of the mean of 286±18 kcal to 358±19 kcal, an increase of a mean±standard error of the mean 34%±7% (P<0.0001). These findings demonstrate that variations in food volume associated with the size of a food's individual pieces affect the portion served, which in turn affects energy intake.
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Breakfast cereal; Energy intake; Food volume; Portion size

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656953      PMCID: PMC4149854          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  12 in total

1.  Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies.

Authors:  A Flint; A Raben; J E Blundell; A Astrup
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-01

2.  Volume of food consumed affects satiety in men.

Authors:  B J Rolls; V H Castellanos; J C Halford; A Kilara; D Panyam; C L Pelkman; G P Smith; M L Thorwart
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Jane Collingwood; Peter J Rogers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning.

Authors:  Stephanie H Fay; Danielle Ferriday; Elanor C Hinton; Nicholas G Shakeshaft; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Incorporation of air into a snack food reduces energy intake.

Authors:  Kathrin M Osterholt; Liane S Roe; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Increasing the volume of a food by incorporating air affects satiety in men.

Authors:  B J Rolls; E A Bell; B A Waugh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes.

Authors:  Brian Wansink; Koert van Ittersum; James E Painter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Plenary Lecture 1: Dietary strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.297

9.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Liane S Roe; Jennifer S Meengs
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  5 in total

1.  A High-Carbohydrate, High-Fiber, Low-Fat Diet Results in Weight Loss among Adults at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Sharon L Edelstein; Geoffrey Walford; Edward J Boyko; Edward S Horton; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; William C Knowler; Maria G Montez; Marinella Temprosa; Mary Hoskin; Kristina I Rother; Linda M Delahanty
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Creativity needs some serendipity: Reflections on a career in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-06

3.  Dietary energy density: Applying behavioural science to weight management.

Authors:  B J Rolls
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2017-08-15

4.  No difference in ad libitum energy intake in healthy men and women consuming beverages sweetened with fructose, glucose, or high-fructose corn syrup: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jessica N Kuzma; Gail Cromer; Derek K Hagman; Kara L Breymeyer; Christian L Roth; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Sarah E Holte; Holly S Callahan; David S Weigle; Mario Kratz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.