Literature DB >> 17188782

Incorporation of air into a snack food reduces energy intake.

Kathrin M Osterholt1, Liane S Roe, Barbara J Rolls.   

Abstract

This study investigated how the air content of a familiar snack food affected energy intake and whether varying the method of serving the snack modified intake. We tested two versions of an extruded snack (cheese puffs) that were equal in energy density (5.7 kcal/g), but differed in energy per volume (less-aerated snack: 1.00 kcal/ml; more-aerated snack: 0.45 kcal/ml). In a within-subjects design, 16 women and 12 men consumed the snacks ad libitum in the laboratory during four afternoon sessions. A standard volume (1250 ml) of each snack was served once in a bowl and once in an opaque bag. Results showed significant differences in intake of the two snacks by energy (p=0.0003) and volume (p<0.0001); subjects consumed 21% less weight and energy (70+/-17 kcal) of the more-aerated snack than the less-aerated snack, although they consumed a 73% greater volume of the more-aerated snack (239+/-24 ml). These findings suggest that subjects responded to both the weight and volume of the snack. Despite differences in intake, hunger and fullness ratings did not differ across conditions. The serving method did not significantly affect intake. Results from this study indicate that incorporating air into food provides a strategy to reduce energy intake from energy-dense snacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17188782      PMCID: PMC2129127          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  30 in total

1.  Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998.

Authors:  Samara Joy Nielsen; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The factor structure and criterion validity of the short form of the Eating Attitudes Test.

Authors:  M Koslowsky; Z Scheinberg; A Bleich; M Mark; A Apter; Y Danon; Z Solomon
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1992-02

3.  Food intake, hunger, and satiety after preloads in women with eating disorders.

Authors:  B J Rolls; A E Andersen; T H Moran; A L McNelis; H C Baier; I C Fedoroff
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  The effect of dietary carbohydrate:fat ratio on energy intake by adult women.

Authors:  P van Stratum; R N Lussenburg; L A van Wezel; A J Vergroesen; H D Cremer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Sensory-specific satiety is affected more by volume than by energy content of a liquid food.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bell; Liane S Roe; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-04

6.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Learned caloric adjustment of human intake.

Authors:  J Louis-Sylvestre; A Tournier; P Verger; M Chabert; B Delorme; J Hossenlopp
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  D M Garner; P E Garfinkel
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  The effects of high and low energy density diets on satiety, energy intake, and eating time of obese and nonobese subjects.

Authors:  K H Duncan; J A Bacon; R L Weinsier
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Determinants of food intake in obesity.

Authors:  R E Nisbett
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Eating for life: designing foods for appetite control.

Authors:  Peter J Wilde
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

2.  The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan.

Authors:  H P F Peters; W P Koppenol; E A H Schuring; S L Abrahamse; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 3.  Creativity needs some serendipity: Reflections on a career in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-06

4.  Variations in cereal volume affect the amount selected and eaten for breakfast.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Jennifer S Meengs; Liane S Roe
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Willemijn M Vermeer
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Dietary energy density: Applying behavioural science to weight management.

Authors:  B J Rolls
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2017-08-15

7.  Popcorn is more satiating than potato chips in normal-weight adults.

Authors:  Von Nguyen; Lisa Cooper; Joshua Lowndes; Kathleen Melanson; Theodore J Angelopoulos; James M Rippe; Kristin Reimers
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Increasing volume of food by incorporating air reduces energy intake.

Authors:  Samuel Serisier; Anthony Pizzagalli; Lucie Leclerc; Alexandre Feugier; Patrick Nguyen; Vincent Biourge; Alexander J German
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2014-12-08

Review 9.  Discrete strategies to reduce intake of discretionary food choices: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica A Grieger; Thomas P Wycherley; Brittany J Johnson; Rebecca K Golley
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.457

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.