OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to quantitatively investigate the mechanisms underlying the performance gains of the recently reported 'recalibrated feedback intention-trained Kalman Filter' (ReFIT-KF). APPROACH: This was accomplished by designing variants of the ReFIT-KF algorithm and evaluating training and online data to understand the neural basis of this improvement. We focused on assessing the contribution of two training set innovations of the ReFIT-KF algorithm: intention estimation and the two-stage training paradigm. MAIN RESULTS: Within the two-stage training paradigm, we found that intention estimation independently increased target acquisition rates by 37% and 59%, respectively, across two monkeys implanted with multiunit intracortical arrays. Intention estimation improved performance by enhancing the tuning properties and the mutual information between the kinematic and neural training data. Furthermore, intention estimation led to fewer shifts in channel tuning between the training set and online control, suggesting that less adaptation was required during online control. Retraining the decoder with online BMI training data also reduced shifts in tuning, suggesting a benefit of training a decoder in the same behavioral context; however, retraining also led to slower online decode velocities. Finally, we demonstrated that one- and two-stage training paradigms performed comparably when intention estimation is applied. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight the utility of intention estimation in reducing the need for adaptive strategies and improving the online performance of BMIs, helping to guide future BMI design decisions.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to quantitatively investigate the mechanisms underlying the performance gains of the recently reported 'recalibrated feedback intention-trained Kalman Filter' (ReFIT-KF). APPROACH: This was accomplished by designing variants of the ReFIT-KF algorithm and evaluating training and online data to understand the neural basis of this improvement. We focused on assessing the contribution of two training set innovations of the ReFIT-KF algorithm: intention estimation and the two-stage training paradigm. MAIN RESULTS: Within the two-stage training paradigm, we found that intention estimation independently increased target acquisition rates by 37% and 59%, respectively, across two monkeys implanted with multiunit intracortical arrays. Intention estimation improved performance by enhancing the tuning properties and the mutual information between the kinematic and neural training data. Furthermore, intention estimation led to fewer shifts in channel tuning between the training set and online control, suggesting that less adaptation was required during online control. Retraining the decoder with online BMI training data also reduced shifts in tuning, suggesting a benefit of training a decoder in the same behavioral context; however, retraining also led to slower online decode velocities. Finally, we demonstrated that one- and two-stage training paradigms performed comparably when intention estimation is applied. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight the utility of intention estimation in reducing the need for adaptive strategies and improving the online performance of BMIs, helping to guide future BMI design decisions.
Authors: Justin C Sanchez; Jose M Carmena; Mikhail A Lebedev; Miguel A L Nicolelis; John G Harris; Jose C Principe Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Amy L Orsborn; Siddharth Dangi; Helene G Moorman; Jose M Carmena Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Beata Jarosiewicz; Steven M Chase; George W Fraser; Meel Velliste; Robert E Kass; Andrew B Schwartz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David Sussillo; Paul Nuyujukian; Joline M Fan; Jonathan C Kao; Sergey D Stavisky; Stephen Ryu; Krishna Shenoy Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Ilka Diester; Jaimie M Henderson; Karl Deisseroth; Krishna V Shenoy Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: John P Cunningham; Paul Nuyujukian; Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Paul Nuyujukian; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Paul Nuyujukian; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy Journal: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 10.961
Authors: Francis R Willett; Brian A Murphy; Daniel R Young; William D Memberg; Christine H Blabe; Chethan Pandarinath; Brian Franco; Jad Saab; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Jonathan P Miller; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy; John D Simeral; Beata Jarosiewicz; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch; Abidemi Bolu Ajiboye Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Francis R Willett; Chethan Pandarinath; Beata Jarosiewicz; Brian A Murphy; William D Memberg; Christine H Blabe; Jad Saab; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Jonathan P Miller; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch; A Bolu Ajiboye Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Francis R Willett; Brian A Murphy; William D Memberg; Christine H Blabe; Chethan Pandarinath; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Jonathan P Miller; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch; A Bolu Ajiboye Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Beata Jarosiewicz; Anish A Sarma; Daniel Bacher; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Brittany Sorice; Erin M Oakley; Christine Blabe; Chethan Pandarinath; Vikash Gilja; Sydney S Cash; Emad N Eskandar; Gerhard Friehs; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 17.956