Literature DB >> 25946198

A high performing brain-machine interface driven by low-frequency local field potentials alone and together with spikes.

Sergey D Stavisky1, Jonathan C Kao, Paul Nuyujukian, Stephen I Ryu, Krishna V Shenoy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) seek to enable people with movement disabilities to directly control prosthetic systems with their neural activity. Current high performance BMIs are driven by action potentials (spikes), but access to this signal often diminishes as sensors degrade over time. Decoding local field potentials (LFPs) as an alternative or complementary BMI control signal may improve performance when there is a paucity of spike signals. To date only a small handful of LFP decoding methods have been tested online; there remains a need to test different LFP decoding approaches and improve LFP-driven performance. There has also not been a reported demonstration of a hybrid BMI that decodes kinematics from both LFP and spikes. Here we first evaluate a BMI driven by the local motor potential (LMP), a low-pass filtered time-domain LFP amplitude feature. We then combine decoding of both LMP and spikes to implement a hybrid BMI. APPROACH: Spikes and LFP were recorded from two macaques implanted with multielectrode arrays in primary and premotor cortex while they performed a reaching task. We then evaluated closed-loop BMI control using biomimetic decoders driven by LMP, spikes, or both signals together. MAIN
RESULTS: LMP decoding enabled quick and accurate cursor control which surpassed previously reported LFP BMI performance. Hybrid decoding of both spikes and LMP improved performance when spikes signal quality was mediocre to poor. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings show that LMP is an effective BMI control signal which requires minimal power to extract and can substitute for or augment impoverished spikes signals. Use of this signal may lengthen the useful lifespan of BMIs and is therefore an important step towards clinically viable BMIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25946198      PMCID: PMC4457459          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/036009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  58 in total

1.  Local field potentials allow accurate decoding of muscle activity.

Authors:  Robert D Flint; Christian Ethier; Emily R Oby; Lee E Miller; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Long-term decoding stability of local field potentials from silicon arrays in primate motor cortex during a 2D center out task.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Qiaosheng Zhang; Yue Li; Yiwen Wang; Junming Zhu; Shaomin Zhang; Xiaoxiang Zheng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Performance sustaining intracortical neural prostheses.

Authors:  Paul Nuyujukian; Jonathan C Kao; Joline M Fan; Sergey D Stavisky; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A high-performance brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Gopal Santhanam; Stephen I Ryu; Byron M Yu; Afsheen Afshar; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Neural Point-and-Click Communication by a Person With Incomplete Locked-In Syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; Sergey D Stavisky; John D Simeral; Katherine Newell; Erin M Oakley; Sydney S Cash; Gerhard Friehs; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  The utility of multichannel local field potentials for brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  A closed-loop human simulator for investigating the role of feedback control in brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  John P Cunningham; Paul Nuyujukian; Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Computer control using human intracortical local field potentials.

Authors:  Philip R Kennedy; M Todd Kirby; Melody M Moore; Brandon King; Adon Mallory
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sung-Phil Kim; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Michael J Black
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Design and validation of a real-time spiking-neural-network decoder for brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Julie Dethier; Paul Nuyujukian; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy; Kwabena Boahen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  34 in total

1.  A low-power band of neuronal spiking activity dominated by local single units improves the performance of brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Samuel R Nason; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Elissa J Welle; Hyochan An; Philip P Vu; Autumn J Bullard; Chrono S Nu; Jonathan C Kao; Krishna V Shenoy; Taekwang Jang; Hun-Seok Kim; David Blaauw; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 2.  Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Trial-by-Trial Motor Cortical Correlates of a Rapidly Adapting Visuomotor Internal Model.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Interfacing to the brain's motor decisions.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Mikhail А Lebedev
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Frequency Shifts and Depth Dependence of Premotor Beta Band Activity during Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Iliana E Bray; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mood variations decoded from multi-site intracranial human brain activity.

Authors:  Omid G Sani; Yuxiao Yang; Morgan B Lee; Heather E Dawes; Edward F Chang; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Speech-related dorsal motor cortex activity does not interfere with iBCI cursor control.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Francis R Willett; Donald T Avansino; Leigh R Hochberg; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Power-saving design opportunities for wireless intracortical brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Nir Even-Chen; Dante G Muratore; Sergey D Stavisky; Leigh R Hochberg; Jaimie M Henderson; Boris Murmann; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 25.671

10.  Multi-View Broad Learning System for Primate Oculomotor Decision Decoding.

Authors:  Zhenhua Shi; Xiaomo Chen; Changming Zhao; He He; Veit Stuphorn; Dongrui Wu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.