Literature DB >> 22772374

Closed-loop decoder adaptation on intermediate time-scales facilitates rapid BMI performance improvements independent of decoder initialization conditions.

Amy L Orsborn1, Siddharth Dangi, Helene G Moorman, Jose M Carmena.   

Abstract

Closed-loop decoder adaptation (CLDA) shows great promise to improve closed-loop brain-machine interface (BMI) performance. Developing adaptation algorithms capable of rapidly improving performance, independent of initial performance, may be crucial for clinical applications where patients have limited movement and sensory abilities due to motor deficits. Given the subject-decoder interactions inherent in closed-loop BMIs, the decoder adaptation time-scale may be of particular importance when initial performance is limited. Here, we present SmoothBatch, a CLDA algorithm which updates decoder parameters on a 1-2 min time-scale using an exponentially weighted sliding average. The algorithm was experimentally tested with one nonhuman primate performing a center-out reaching BMI task. SmoothBatch was seeded four ways with varying offline decoding power: 1) visual observation of a cursor ( n = 20), 2) ipsilateral arm movements ( n = 8), 3) baseline neural activity ( n = 17), and 4) arbitrary weights ( n = 11). SmoothBatch rapidly improved performance regardless of seeding, with performance improvements from 0.018 ±0.133 successes/min to > 8 successes/min within 13.1 ±5.5 min ( n = 56). After decoder adaptation ceased, the subject maintained high performance. Moreover, performance improvements were paralleled by SmoothBatch convergence, suggesting that CLDA involves a co-adaptation process between the subject and the decoder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772374     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2185066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  48 in total

1.  Brain-state classification and a dual-state decoder dramatically improve the control of cursor movement through a brain-machine interface.

Authors:  Nicholas A Sachs; Ricardo Ruiz-Torres; Eric J Perreault; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Modulation depth estimation and variable selection in state-space models for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Wasim Q Malik; Leigh R Hochberg; John P Donoghue; Emery N Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adaptive neuron-to-EMG decoder training for FES neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Daniel Acuna; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Motor cortical control of movement speed with implications for brain-machine interface control.

Authors:  Matthew D Golub; Byron M Yu; Andrew B Schwartz; Steven M Chase
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Static Versus Dynamic Decoding Algorithms in a Non-Invasive Body-Machine Interface.

Authors:  Ismael Seanez-Gonzalez; Camilla Pierella; Ali Farshchiansadegh; Elias B Thorp; Farnaz Abdollahi; Jessica P Pedersen; Ferdinando A Sandro Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Rapid calibration of an intracortical brain-computer interface for people with tetraplegia.

Authors:  David M Brandman; Tommy Hosman; Jad Saab; Michael C Burkhart; Benjamin E Shanahan; John G Ciancibello; Anish A Sarma; Daniel J Milstein; Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; Brian Franco; Jessica Kelemen; Christine Blabe; Brian A Murphy; Daniel R Young; Francis R Willett; Chethan Pandarinath; Sergey D Stavisky; Robert F Kirsch; Benjamin L Walter; A Bolu Ajiboye; Sydney S Cash; Emad N Eskandar; Jonathan P Miller; Jennifer A Sweet; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson; Beata Jarosiewicz; Matthew T Harrison; John D Simeral; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Improving brain-machine interface performance by decoding intended future movements.

Authors:  Francis R Willett; Aaron J Suminski; Andrew H Fagg; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Intention estimation in brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Joline M Fan; Paul Nuyujukian; Jonathan C Kao; Cynthia A Chestek; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Adaptive offset correction for intracortical brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark L Homer; Janos A Perge; Michael J Black; Matthew T Harrison; Sydney S Cash; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.