OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the risk scoring system towards the advanced colorectal neoplasm (CN) risk in the average-risk populations in the southern Jiangsu Province, and to evaluate the screening efficacy. METHODS: Totally 905 cases of the average-risk populations who received the colonoscopy were selected as the objective. The multivariate logistic regression analysis method was used to establish the scoring system towards the occurrence risk of the advanced tumor, and its screening efficacy was evaluated through the prediction consistency, distinguishing ability and screening accuracy. RESULTS: The scoring system consisted of five variables, namely age, gender, coronary heart disease, egg intake and stool frequency. The results revealed that it had good prediction consistency (P=0.205) and distinguishing ability [the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.75, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.69-0.82]. Thus, 2.5 points was set as the screening cutoff value, and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 93.8%, 47.6%, 50.1%, 9.1%, 99.3%, 1.79 and 0.13, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The established scoring system had good screening efficacy, and can be used as the screening tool applying to the CN screening within the average-risk populations in the southern Jiangsu Province.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the risk scoring system towards the advanced colorectal neoplasm (CN) risk in the average-risk populations in the southern Jiangsu Province, and to evaluate the screening efficacy. METHODS: Totally 905 cases of the average-risk populations who received the colonoscopy were selected as the objective. The multivariate logistic regression analysis method was used to establish the scoring system towards the occurrence risk of the advanced tumor, and its screening efficacy was evaluated through the prediction consistency, distinguishing ability and screening accuracy. RESULTS: The scoring system consisted of five variables, namely age, gender, coronary heart disease, egg intake and stool frequency. The results revealed that it had good prediction consistency (P=0.205) and distinguishing ability [the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.75, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.69-0.82]. Thus, 2.5 points was set as the screening cutoff value, and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 93.8%, 47.6%, 50.1%, 9.1%, 99.3%, 1.79 and 0.13, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The established scoring system had good screening efficacy, and can be used as the screening tool applying to the CN screening within the average-risk populations in the southern Jiangsu Province.
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Sacha E Bleeker; Henriëtte A Moll; Diederick E Grobbee; Karel G M Moons Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: A O O Chan; K F Lam; T Tong; D C W Siu; M H Jim; W M Hui; K C Lai; M F Yuen; S K Lam; B C Y Wong Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jolanda de Boer; Theodore R Levin; Chyke Doubeni; Bruce H Fireman; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Cesare Hassan; B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Antonio Rinaldi; Alessandro Repici; Perry J Pickhardt Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Frank T Kolligs; Alexander Crispin; Axel Munte; Andreas Wagner; Ulrich Mansmann; Burkhard Göke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bradley J Nartowt; Gregory R Hart; David A Roffman; Xavier Llor; Issa Ali; Wazir Muhammad; Ying Liang; Jun Deng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Le Peng; Yesilda Balavarca; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ala I Sharara; Ali El Mokahal; Ali H Harb; Natalia Khalaf; Fayez S Sarkis; Mustapha M El-Halabi; Nabil M Mansour; Ahmad Malli; Robert Habib Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 5.742