Literature DB >> 22985608

Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs.

Douglas A Corley1, Christopher D Jensen, Amy R Marks, Wei K Zhao, Jolanda de Boer, Theodore R Levin, Chyke Doubeni, Bruce H Fireman, Charles P Quesenberry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reliable community-based colorectal adenoma prevalence estimates are needed to inform colonoscopy quality standards and to estimate patient colorectal cancer risks; however, minimal data exist from populations with large numbers of diverse patients and examiners.
METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of adenomas detected by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and colon location among 20,792 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members ≥50 years of age who received a screening colonoscopy examination (102 gastroenterologists, 2006-2008).
RESULTS: Prevalence of detected adenomas increased more rapidly with age in the proximal colon (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-2.80; 70-74 vs 50-54 years) than in the distal colon (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.63-2.19). Prevalence was higher among men vs women at all ages (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.66-1.89), increasing in men from 25% to 39% at ≥70 years and in women from 15% at 50-54 years to 26% (P < .001). Proximal adenoma prevalence was higher among blacks than whites (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.54), although total prevalence was similar, including persons <60 years old (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50).
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of detected adenomas increases substantially with age and is much higher in men; proximal adenomas are more common among blacks than whites, although the total prevalence and the prevalence for ages <60 years were similar by race. These demographic differences are such that current adenoma detection guidelines may not be valid, without adjustment, for comparing providers serving different populations. The variation in prevalence and location may also have implications for the effectiveness of screening methods in different demographic groups.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985608      PMCID: PMC3954741          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  36 in total

1.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Adenoma detection rate increases with each decade of life after 50 years of age.

Authors:  Sarah J Diamond; Brintha K Enestvedt; Zibing Jiang; Jennifer L Holub; Maneesh Gupta; David A Lieberman; Glenn M Eisen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk African Americans.

Authors:  D K Rex; A M Khan; P Shah; J Newton; O W Cummings
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening of asymptomatic Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Brent Lee; Jennifer Holub; Dawn Peters; David Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Site-specific distribution of large-bowel adenomatous polyps. Emphasis on ethnic differences.

Authors:  H Johnson; I Margolis; L Wise
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Risk-adjusted colon and rectal cancer incidence rates in the United States.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Allison E Anderson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Effect of race and socioeconomic status in the treatment of appendicitis in patients with equal health care access.

Authors:  Steven L Lee; Shant Shekherdimian; Vicki Y Chiu
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02

9.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Racial differences in the anatomical distribution of colon cancer.

Authors:  C R Thomas; R Jarosz; N Evans
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-10
View more
  82 in total

1.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Prediction rule for estimating advanced colorectal neoplasm risk in average-risk populations in southern Jiangsu Province.

Authors:  Guochang Chen; Boneng Mao; Qi Pan; Qian Liu; Xinfang Xu; Yueji Ning
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Barriers and facilitators to adherence to screening colonoscopy among African-Americans: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Carrie R Wong; Elana R Bloomfield; Danielle M Crookes; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: PCORnet.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Tracy A Lieu; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.

Authors:  Lina D Song; Joseph P Newhouse; Xabier Garcia-De-Albeniz; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Racial Disparity in Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Sonia S Kupfer; Hassan Brim; John M Carethers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Race and Prevalence of Large Bowel Polyps Among the Low-Income and Uninsured in South Carolina.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Heather M Brandt; James D Bearden; Bridgette F Blankenship; Renay Caldwell; James Dunn; Patricia Hegedus; Brenda J Hoffman; Courtney H Marsh; William H Marsh; Cathy L Melvin; March E Seabrook; Ronald E Sterba; Mary Lou Stinson; Annie Thibault; Franklin G Berger; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Colorectal neoplasia detection among black and Latino individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristen K Lee; Lina Jandorf; Linda Thélèmaque; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  The association of age and race and the risk of large bowel polyps.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Carol A Burke; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Fred Saibil; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.