Literature DB >> 24652939

Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions.

Alexandre Orthwein1, Amélie Fradet-Turcotte, Sylvie M Noordermeer, Marella D Canny, Catherine M Brun, Jonathan Strecker, Cristina Escribano-Diaz, Daniel Durocher.   

Abstract

Mitotic cells inactivate DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, but the rationale behind this suppression remains unknown. Here, we unravel how mitosis blocks DSB repair and determine the consequences of repair reactivation. Mitotic kinases phosphorylate the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF8 and the nonhomologous end joining factor 53BP1 to inhibit their recruitment to DSB-flanking chromatin. Restoration of RNF8 and 53BP1 accumulation at mitotic DSB sites activates DNA repair but is, paradoxically, deleterious. Aberrantly controlled mitotic DSB repair leads to Aurora B kinase-dependent sister telomere fusions that produce dicentric chromosomes and aneuploidy, especially in the presence of exogenous genotoxic stress. We conclude that the capacity of mitotic DSB repair to destabilize the genome explains the necessity for its suppression during mitosis, principally due to the fusogenic potential of mitotic telomeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24652939     DOI: 10.1126/science.1248024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  153 in total

1.  TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis.

Authors:  Irene Gallina; Signe Korbo Christiansen; Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen; Michael Lisby; Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Nico P Dantuma; Haico van Attikum
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Not All DDRs Are Created Equal: Non-Canonical DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 5.  Stop pulling my strings - what telomeres taught us about the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Agnel Sfeir
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset.

Authors:  Bárbara Alcaraz Silva; Jessica R Stambaugh; Kyoko Yokomori; Jagesh V Shah; Michael W Berns
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Plk1 Manages DNA break repair during mitosis.

Authors:  Ines Teles Alves; Marcel A T M van Vugt
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.250

9.  ANCHR mediates Aurora-B-dependent abscission checkpoint control through retention of VPS4.

Authors:  Sigrid B Thoresen; Coen Campsteijn; Marina Vietri; Kay O Schink; Knut Liestøl; Jens S Andersen; Camilla Raiborg; Harald Stenmark
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Rho GTPase independent regulation of ATM activation and cell survival by the RhoGEF Net1A.

Authors:  Wonkyung Oh; Jeffrey A Frost
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.