Literature DB >> 24982423

DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset.

Bárbara Alcaraz Silva1, Jessica R Stambaugh2, Kyoko Yokomori3, Jagesh V Shah4, Michael W Berns5.   

Abstract

Chromosome ends contain nucleoprotein structures known as telomeres. Damage to chromosome ends during interphase elicits a DNA damage response (DDR) resulting in cell cycle arrest. However, little is known regarding the signaling from damaged chromosome ends (designated here as "TIPs") during mitosis. In the present study, we investigated the consequences of DNA damage induced at a single TIP in mitosis. We used laser microirradiation to damage mitotic TIPs or chromosome arms (non-TIPs) in PtK2 kidney epithelial cells. We found that damage to a single TIP, but not a non-TIP, delays anaphase onset. This TIP-specific checkpoint response is accompanied by differential recruitment of DDR proteins. Although phosphorylation of H2AX and the recruitment of several repair factors, such as Ku70-Ku80, occur in a comparable manner at both TIP and non-TIP damage sites, DDR factors such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), MDC1, WRN, and FANCD2 are specifically recruited to TIPs but not to non-TIPs. In addition, Nbs1, BRCA1, and ubiquitin accumulate at damaged TIPs more rapidly than at damaged non-TIPs. ATR and 53BP1 are not detected at either TIPs or non-TIPs in mitosis. The observed delay in anaphase onset is dependent on the activity of DDR kinases ATM and Chk1, and the spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1. Cells damaged at a single TIP or non-TIP eventually exit mitosis with unrepaired lesions. Damaged TIPs are segregated into micronuclei at a significantly higher frequency than damaged non-TIPs. Together, these findings reveal a mitosis-specific DDR uniquely associated with chromosome ends.
© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphase; Chromosomes; Cytokinesis; DNA Damage; DNA Damage Response; Laser Microirradiation; Mitosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24982423      PMCID: PMC4132783          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.535955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  74 in total

1.  Internet-based robotic laser scissors and tweezers microscopy.

Authors:  Elliot L Botvinick; Michael W Berns
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Werner and Bloom helicases are involved in DNA repair in a complementary fashion.

Authors:  Osamu Imamura; Kumiko Fujita; Chie Itoh; Shunichi Takeda; Yasuhiro Furuichi; Takehisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  V A Smits; R Klompmaker; L Arnaud; G Rijksen; E A Nigg; R H Medema
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  DNA damage during the spindle-assembly checkpoint degrades CDC25A, inhibits cyclin-CDC2 complexes, and reverses cells to interphase.

Authors:  Jeremy P H Chow; Wai Yi Siu; Tsz Kan Fung; Wan Mui Chan; Anita Lau; Talha Arooz; Chuen-Pei Ng; Katsumi Yamashita; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Whole chromosome loss is promoted by telomere dysfunction in primary cells.

Authors:  Judit Pampalona; David Soler; Anna Genescà; Laura Tusell
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Chromosome tips damaged in anaphase inhibit cytokinesis.

Authors:  Norman M Baker; Samantha G Zeitlin; Linda Z Shi; Jagesh Shah; Michael W Berns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing.

Authors:  Jagesh V Shah; Elliot Botvinick; Zahid Bonday; Frank Furnari; Michael Berns; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Highlighting the DNA damage response with ultrashort laser pulses in the near infrared and kinetic modeling.

Authors:  Elisa Ferrando-May; Martin Tomas; Philipp Blumhardt; Martin Stöckl; Matthias Fuchs; Alfred Leitenstorfer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Impact of histone H4 lysine 20 methylation on 53BP1 responses to chromosomal double strand breaks.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Yinghua Guan; Anbazhagan Rajendran; Kiyoe Ura; Gunnar Schotta; Anyong Xie; Jagesh V Shah; Ralph Scully
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Femtosecond near-infrared laser microirradiation reveals a crucial role for PARP signaling on factor assemblies at DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Gladys Mae Saquilabon Cruz; Xiangduo Kong; Bárbara Alcaraz Silva; Nima Khatibzadeh; Ryan Thai; Michael W Berns; Kyoko Yokomori
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

3.  Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage.

Authors:  Xiangduo Kong; Gladys M S Cruz; Bárbara A Silva; Nicole M Wakida; Nima Khatibzadeh; Michael W Berns; Kyoko Yokomori
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Dysfunctional telomeres trigger cellular senescence mediated by cyclic GMP-AMP synthase.

Authors:  Salim Abdisalaam; Souparno Bhattacharya; Shibani Mukherjee; Debapriya Sinha; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Mingrui Zhu; Esra A Akbay; Hesham A Sadek; Jerry W Shay; Aroumougame Asaithamby
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  DNA damage response in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Shiyao Zhu; Navjotsingh Pabla; Chengyuan Tang; Liyu He; Zheng Dong
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  NAD+ consumption by PARP1 in response to DNA damage triggers metabolic shift critical for damaged cell survival.

Authors:  Michael M Murata; Xiangduo Kong; Emmanuel Moncada; Yumay Chen; Hiromi Imamura; Ping Wang; Michael W Berns; Kyoko Yokomori; Michelle A Digman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  DNA damage induced during mitosis undergoes DNA repair synthesis.

Authors:  Veronica Gomez Godinez; Sami Kabbara; Adria Sherman; Tao Wu; Shirli Cohen; Xiangduo Kong; Jose Luis Maravillas-Montero; Zhixia Shi; Daryl Preece; Kyoko Yokomori; Michael W Berns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bub3-BubR1-dependent sequestration of Cdc20Fizzy at DNA breaks facilitates the correct segregation of broken chromosomes.

Authors:  Nicolas Derive; Cedric Landmann; Emilie Montembault; Marie-Charlotte Claverie; Priscillia Pierre-Elies; Damien Goutte-Gattat; Nabila Founounou; Derek McCusker; Anne Royou
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.