Literature DB >> 26701150

TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis.

Irene Gallina1, Signe Korbo Christiansen1, Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen1, Michael Lisby1, Vibe H Oestergaard1.   

Abstract

Maintenance of genome integrity is crucial to avoid cancer and other genetic diseases. Thus faced with DNA damage, cells mount a DNA damage response to avoid genome instability. The DNA damage response is partially inhibited during mitosis presumably to avoid erroneous processing of the segregating chromosomes. Yet our recent study shows that TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis is highly important to reduce transmission of DNA damage to daughter cells. (1) Here we provide an overview of the DNA damage response and DNA repair during mitosis. One role of TopBP1 during mitosis is to stimulate unscheduled DNA synthesis at underreplicated regions. We speculated that such genomic regions are likely to hold stalled replication forks or post-replicative gaps, which become the substrate for DNA synthesis upon entry into mitosis. Thus, we addressed whether the translesion pathways for fork restart or post-replicative gap filling are required for unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis. Using genetics in the avian DT40 cell line, we provide evidence that unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis does not require the translesion synthesis scaffold factor Rev1 or PCNA ubiquitylation at K164, which serve to recruit translesion polymerases to stalled forks. In line with this finding, translesion polymerase η foci do not colocalize with TopBP1 or FANCD2 in mitosis. Taken together, we conclude that TopBP1 promotes unscheduled DNA synthesis in mitosis independently of the examined translesion polymerases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCNA ubiquitylation; REV1; TopBP1; fork restart; mitosis; polymerase η; post-replicative gaps; replication stress; translesion synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26701150      PMCID: PMC4825820          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1128595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  98 in total

1.  Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Nathan C Shaner; Robert E Campbell; Paul A Steinbach; Ben N G Giepmans; Amy E Palmer; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint.

Authors:  Tony S Byun; Marcin Pacek; Muh-ching Yee; Johannes C Walter; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis?

Authors:  Errol C Friedberg; Alan R Lehmann; Robert P P Fuchs
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Lee; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase zeta.

Authors:  J R Nelson; C W Lawrence; D C Hinkle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Evidence that DNA damage detection machinery participates in DNA repair.

Authors:  Christopher E Helt; Wensheng Wang; Peter C Keng; Robert A Bambara
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-04-10       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; M Huang; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair.

Authors:  Fumiko Esashi; Nicole Christ; Julian Gannon; Yilun Liu; Tim Hunt; Maria Jasin; Stephen C West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Ubiquitin/SUMO modification of PCNA promotes replication fork progression in Xenopus laevis egg extracts.

Authors:  Craig A Leach; W Matthew Michael
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Transcription-replication conflicts at chromosomal fragile sites-consequences in M phase and beyond.

Authors:  Vibe H Oestergaard; Michael Lisby
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Immunostaining of Formaldehyde-fixed Metaphase Chromosome from Untreated and Aphidicolin-treated DT40 Cells.

Authors:  Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  FANCD2 binding identifies conserved fragile sites at large transcribed genes in avian cells.

Authors:  Constanze Pentzold; Shiraz Ali Shah; Niels Richard Hansen; Benoît Le Tallec; Andaine Seguin-Orlando; Michelle Debatisse; Michael Lisby; Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Rescue from replication stress during mitosis.

Authors:  Michalis Fragkos; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  CK2 Phosphorylation of Human Papillomavirus 16 E2 on Serine 23 Promotes Interaction with TopBP1 and Is Critical for E2 Interaction with Mitotic Chromatin and the Viral Life Cycle.

Authors:  Apurva T Prabhakar; Claire D James; Dipon Das; Raymonde Otoa; Matthew Day; John Burgner; Christian T Fontan; Xu Wang; Sarah H Glass; Andreas Wieland; Mary M Donaldson; Molly L Bristol; Renfeng Li; Anthony W Oliver; Laurence H Pearl; Brian O Smith; Iain M Morgan
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Interaction with TopBP1 Is Required for Human Papillomavirus 16 E2 Plasmid Segregation/Retention Function during Mitosis.

Authors:  Apurva T Prabhakar; Claire D James; Dipon Das; Christian T Fontan; Raymonde Otoa; Xu Wang; Molly L Bristol; Iain M Morgan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.549

7.  Microarray analyses reveal genes related to progression and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mao Qixing; Dong Gaochao; Xia Wenjie; Wang Anpeng; Chen Bing; Ma Weidong; Xu Lin; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-12

Review 8.  Working on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis.

Authors:  Sara Ovejero; Avelino Bueno; María P Sacristán
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.