Literature DB >> 24647914

Going native? Flower use by bumblebees in English urban gardens.

Mick E Hanley1, Amanda J Awbi, Miguel Franco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although urban gardens provide opportunities for pollinators in an otherwise inhospitable environment, most garden plants are not native to the recipient biogeographical region and their value to local pollinators is disputed. This study tested the hypothesis that bumblebees foraging in English urban gardens preferentially visited sympatric Palaearctic-range plants over species originating outside their native range.
METHODS: Twenty-seven surveys of flower availability and bumblebee visitation (Bombus spp.) were conducted over a 3-month summer period. Plants were categorized according to whether they were native British, Palaearctic or non-Palaearctic in origin. A phylogeny of the 119 plant species recorded was constructed and the relationship between floral abundance and the frequency of pollinator visits investigated by means of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Differentiation in utilization of plant species by the five bumblebee species encountered was investigated using niche overlap analyses. KEY
RESULTS: There was conflicting evidence for preferential use of native-range Palaearctic plant species by bumblebees depending on which plants were included in the analysis. Evidence was also found for niche partitioning between species based on respective preferences for native and non-native biogeographical range plants. Two bumblebees (Bombus terrestris and B. pratorum) concentrated their foraging activity on non-Palaearctic plants, while two others (B. hortorum and B. pascourum) preferred Palaearctic species.
CONCLUSIONS: The long-running debate about the value of native and non-native garden plants to pollinators probably stems from a failure to properly consider biogeographical overlap between plant and pollinator ranges. Gardeners can encourage pollinators without consideration of plant origin or bias towards 'local' biogeographical species. However, dietary specialist bumblebees seem to prefer plants sympatric with their own biogeographical range and, in addition to the cultivation of these species in gardens, provision of native non-horticultural ('weed') species may also be important for pollinator conservation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeographical range; Bombus; bumblebee; exotic plants; foraging; horticulture; niche differentiation; pollinators; urban conservation; wildlife gardening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24647914      PMCID: PMC3962246          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  6 in total

1.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree.

Authors:  N Wikström; V Savolainen; M W Chase
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Nickolas M Waser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution.

Authors:  Campbell O Webb; David D Ackerly; Steven W Kembel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes.

Authors:  Karin T Burghardt; Douglas W Tallamy; W Gregory Shriver
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.

Authors:  Mark A Goddard; Andrew J Dougill; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage.

Authors:  Sarah J Hinners; Carol A Kearns; Carol A Wessman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.657

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Green infrastructure and ecosystem services - is the devil in the detail?

Authors:  Ross W F Cameron; Tijana Blanuša
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Artificial asymmetric warming reduces nectar yield in a Tibetan alpine species of Asteraceae.

Authors:  Junpeng Mu; Youhong Peng; Xinqiang Xi; Xinwei Wu; Guoyong Li; Karl J Niklas; Shucun Sun
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Disentangling urban habitat and matrix effects on wild bee species.

Authors:  Leonie K Fischer; Julia Eichfeld; Ingo Kowarik; Sascha Buchholz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region.

Authors:  Benoît Geslin; Violette Le Féon; Morgane Folschweiller; Floriane Flacher; David Carmignac; Eric Motard; Samuel Perret; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Urbanisation modulates plant-pollinator interactions in invasive vs. native plant species.

Authors:  Sascha Buchholz; Ingo Kowarik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of Urbanization on Plant-Pollinator Interactions in the Tropics: An Experimental Approach Using Exotic Plants.

Authors:  Marie Zakardjian; Benoît Geslin; Valentin Mitran; Evelyne Franquet; Hervé Jourdan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Habitat and landscape factors influence pollinators in a tropical megacity, Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Alyssa B Stewart; Tuanjit Sritongchuay; Piyakarn Teartisup; Sakonwan Kaewsomboon; Sara Bumrungsri
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.