Literature DB >> 23210309

Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage.

Sarah J Hinners1, Carol A Kearns, Carol A Wessman.   

Abstract

Wild pollinators provide important services to both wild and human-dominated ecosystems, yet this group may be threatened by widespread anthropogenic landscape change. Suburban sprawl is one of the fastest growing types of land use change in North America, and it has certain characteristics, such as abundant floral resources, that may be beneficial for many pollinators. We examined the effects of sprawl on the wild bee assemblage of the shortgrass steppe on the Front Range of Colorado, USA. Diversity, abundance, and community composition of bees in remnant grassland fragments surrounded by suburban residential land use were compared with those in extensive, continuous grassland. No overall effect of suburbanization on bee abundance was observed, and abundance was extremely variable even within study sites. Bee species richness was positively but nonlinearly related to grassland habitat area. Bee species density was higher and more variable in suburban sites. Suburban sites and smaller habitat area were both related to relative increases in the proportions of small bee species, social bees, and solitary cavity-nesting bees in the assemblage; small suburban habitat areas also favored species of the family Halictidae over Apidae, and individuals of the genus Halictus over those of the genus Lasioglossum. In this landscape, large native habitat areas surrounded by suburban sprawl may actually increase species richness and species density over that of continuous grassland, probably by means of habitat complementation or supplementation between grassland remnants and the surrounding suburban matrix. However, at habitat areas < 20 ha, species richness became quite variable; sites < 8 ha contained less than half the species of controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23210309     DOI: 10.1890/11-1590.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  10 in total

1.  Going native? Flower use by bumblebees in English urban gardens.

Authors:  Mick E Hanley; Amanda J Awbi; Miguel Franco
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The impact of over 80 years of land cover changes on bee and wasp pollinator communities in England.

Authors:  Deepa Senapathi; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Cassie-Ann Dodson; Rebecca L Evans; Megan McKerchar; R Daniel Morton; Ellen D Moss; Stuart P M Roberts; William E Kunin; Simon G Potts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  An assessment of the efficacy and peak catch rates of emergence tents for measuring bee nesting.

Authors:  Alexander M Pane; Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.936

4.  Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.

Authors:  Jeroen Everaars; Josef Settele; Carsten F Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Along urbanization sprawl, exotic plants distort native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) assemblages in high elevation Andes ecosystem.

Authors:  Patricia Henríquez-Piskulich; Alejandro Vera; Gino Sandoval; Cristian Villagra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Seasonal dynamics in a cavity-nesting bee-wasp community: Shifts in composition, functional diversity and host-parasitoid network structure.

Authors:  Sergio Osorio-Canadas; Xavier Arnan; Emili Bassols; Narcís Vicens; Jordi Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Seasonal Variations of Pollinator Assemblages among Urban and Rural Habitats: A Comparative Approach Using a Standardized Plant Community.

Authors:  Vincent Zaninotto; Adrien Perrard; Olivier Babiar; Amandine Hansart; Cécile Hignard; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Sweeping beauty: is grassland arthropod community composition effectively estimated by sweep netting?

Authors:  Ryan D Spafford; Christopher J Lortie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Bee Fauna and Floral Abundance Within Lawn-Dominated Suburban Yards in Springfield, MA.

Authors:  S B Lerman; J Milam
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  Urban gardens promote bee foraging over natural habitats and plantations.

Authors:  Benjamin F Kaluza; Helen Wallace; Tim A Heard; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Sara D Leonhardt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.