Ross W F Cameron1, Tijana Blanuša2. 1. Department of Landscape, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK r.w.cameron@sheffield.ac.uk. 2. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AR, UK Royal Horticultural Society, Plant Sciences Department, RHS Garden Wisley, Woking GU23 6QB, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Green infrastructure is a strategic network of green spaces designed to deliver ecosystem services to human communities. Green infrastructure is a convenient concept for urban policy makers, but the term is used too generically and with limited understanding of the relative values or benefits of different types of green space and how these complement one another. At a finer scale/more practical level, little consideration is given to the composition of the plant communities, yet this is what ultimately defines the extent of service provision. This paper calls for greater attention to be paid to urban plantings with respect to ecosystem service delivery and for plant science to engage more fully in identifying those plants that promote various services. SCOPE: Many urban plantings are designed based on aesthetics alone, with limited thought on how plant choice/composition provides other ecosystem services. Research is beginning to demonstrate, however, that landscape plants provide a range of important services, such as helping mitigate floods and alleviating heat islands, but that not all species are equally effective. The paper reviews a number of important services and demonstrates how genotype choice radically affects service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Although research is in its infancy, data are being generated that relate plant traits to specific services, thereby helping identify genotypes that optimize service delivery. The urban environment, however, will become exceedingly bland if future planting is simply restricted to monocultures of a few 'functional' genotypes. Therefore, further information is required on how to design plant communities where the plants identified (1) provide more than a single benefit (multifunctionality), (B) complement each other in maximizing the range of benefits that can be delivered in one location, and (3) continue to maintain public acceptance through diversity. The identification/development of functional landscape plants is an exciting and potentially high-impact arena for plant science.
BACKGROUND: Green infrastructure is a strategic network of green spaces designed to deliver ecosystem services to human communities. Green infrastructure is a convenient concept for urban policy makers, but the term is used too generically and with limited understanding of the relative values or benefits of different types of green space and how these complement one another. At a finer scale/more practical level, little consideration is given to the composition of the plant communities, yet this is what ultimately defines the extent of service provision. This paper calls for greater attention to be paid to urban plantings with respect to ecosystem service delivery and for plant science to engage more fully in identifying those plants that promote various services. SCOPE: Many urban plantings are designed based on aesthetics alone, with limited thought on how plant choice/composition provides other ecosystem services. Research is beginning to demonstrate, however, that landscape plants provide a range of important services, such as helping mitigate floods and alleviating heat islands, but that not all species are equally effective. The paper reviews a number of important services and demonstrates how genotype choice radically affects service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Although research is in its infancy, data are being generated that relate plant traits to specific services, thereby helping identify genotypes that optimize service delivery. The urban environment, however, will become exceedingly bland if future planting is simply restricted to monocultures of a few 'functional' genotypes. Therefore, further information is required on how to design plant communities where the plants identified (1) provide more than a single benefit (multifunctionality), (B) complement each other in maximizing the range of benefits that can be delivered in one location, and (3) continue to maintain public acceptance through diversity. The identification/development of functional landscape plants is an exciting and potentially high-impact arena for plant science.
Keywords:
Alien plants; biodiversity; building energy efficiency; carbon sequestration; ecosystem services; green infrastructure; human health and well-being; policy; pollution; storm-water management; temperature regulation; urban.
Authors: Nicholaus D VanWoert; D Bradley Rowe; Jeffrey A Andresen; Clayton L Rugh; R Thomas Fernandez; Lan Xiao Journal: J Environ Qual Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 2.751
Authors: Forest Isbell; Vincent Calcagno; Andy Hector; John Connolly; W Stanley Harpole; Peter B Reich; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Bernhard Schmid; David Tilman; Jasper van Ruijven; Alexandra Weigelt; Brian J Wilsey; Erika S Zavaleta; Michel Loreau Journal: Nature Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lars Gamfeldt; Tord Snäll; Robert Bagchi; Micael Jonsson; Lena Gustafsson; Petter Kjellander; María C Ruiz-Jaen; Mats Fröberg; Johan Stendahl; Christopher D Philipson; Grzegorz Mikusiński; Erik Andersson; Bertil Westerlund; Henrik Andrén; Fredrik Moberg; Jon Moen; Jan Bengtsson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919