Literature DB >> 24642280

Developmental improvements in voluntary control of behavior: effect of preparation in the fronto-parietal network?

Nadia Alahyane1, Donald C Brien2, Brian C Coe2, Patrick W Stroman2, Douglas P Munoz3.   

Abstract

The ability to prepare for an action improves the speed and accuracy of its performance. While many studies indicate that behavior performance continues to improve throughout childhood and adolescence, it remains unclear whether or how preparatory processes change with development. Here, we used a rapid event-related fMRI design in three age groups (8-12, 13-17, 18-25years) who were instructed to execute either a prosaccade (look toward peripheral target) or an antisaccade (look away from target) task. We compared brain activity within the core fronto-parietal network involved in saccade control at two epochs of saccade generation: saccade preparation related to task instruction versus saccade execution related to target appearance. The inclusion of catch trials containing only task instruction and no target or saccade response allowed us to isolate saccade preparation from saccade execution. Five regions of interest were selected: the frontal, supplementary, parietal eye fields which are consistently recruited during saccade generation, and two regions involved in top down executive control: the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Our results showed strong evidence that developmental improvements in saccade performance were related to better saccade preparation rather than saccade execution. These developmental differences were mostly attributable to children who showed reduced fronto-parietal activity during prosaccade and antisaccade preparation, along with longer saccade reaction times and more incorrect responses, compared to adolescents and adults. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was engaged similarly across age groups, suggesting a general role in maintaining task instructions through the whole experiment. Overall, these findings suggest that developmental improvements in behavioral control are supported by improvements in effectively presetting goal-appropriate brain systems.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child development; Cognitive control; Frontal cortex; Saccade; Task set; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642280     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

Review 1.  Neural Substrates of Inhibitory Control Maturation in Adolescence.

Authors:  Christos Constantinidis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Frontal preparatory neural oscillations associated with cognitive control: A developmental study comparing young adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Kai Hwang; Avniel S Ghuman; Dara S Manoach; Stephanie R Jones; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neurobehavioral maturation of motor response inhibition in adolescence - A narrative review.

Authors:  Hannah Weiss; Monica Luciana
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 9.052

Review 5.  An integrative model of the maturation of cognitive control.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna; Scott Marek; Bart Larsen; Brenden Tervo-Clemmens; Rajpreet Chahal
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study.

Authors:  B Chaarani; S Hahn; N Allgaier; S Adise; M M Owens; A C Juliano; D K Yuan; H Loso; A Ivanciu; M D Albaugh; J Dumas; S Mackey; J Laurent; M Ivanova; D J Hagler; M D Cornejo; S Hatton; A Agrawal; L Aguinaldo; L Ahonen; W Aklin; A P Anokhin; J Arroyo; S Avenevoli; D Babcock; K Bagot; F C Baker; M T Banich; D M Barch; H Bartsch; A Baskin-Sommers; J M Bjork; D Blachman-Demner; M Bloch; R Bogdan; S Y Bookheimer; F Breslin; S Brown; F J Calabro; V Calhoun; B J Casey; L Chang; D B Clark; C Cloak; R T Constable; K Constable; R Corley; L B Cottler; S Coxe; R K Dagher; A M Dale; M Dapretto; R Delcarmen-Wiggins; A S Dick; E K Do; N U F Dosenbach; G J Dowling; S Edwards; T M Ernst; D A Fair; C C Fan; E Feczko; S W Feldstein-Ewing; P Florsheim; J J Foxe; E G Freedman; N P Friedman; S Friedman-Hill; B F Fuemmeler; A Galvan; D G Gee; J Giedd; M Glantz; P Glaser; J Godino; M Gonzalez; R Gonzalez; S Grant; K M Gray; F Haist; M P Harms; S Hawes; A C Heath; S Heeringa; M M Heitzeg; R Hermosillo; M M Herting; J M Hettema; J K Hewitt; C Heyser; E Hoffman; K Howlett; R S Huber; M A Huestis; L W Hyde; W G Iacono; M A Infante; O Irfanoglu; A Isaiah; S Iyengar; J Jacobus; R James; B Jean-Francois; T Jernigan; N R Karcher; A Kaufman; B Kelley; B Kit; A Ksinan; J Kuperman; A R Laird; C Larson; K LeBlanc; C Lessov-Schlagger; N Lever; D A Lewis; K Lisdahl; A R Little; M Lopez; M Luciana; B Luna; P A Madden; H H Maes; C Makowski; A T Marshall; M J Mason; J Matochik; B D McCandliss; E McGlade; I Montoya; G Morgan; A Morris; C Mulford; P Murray; B J Nagel; M C Neale; G Neigh; A Nencka; A Noronha; S J Nixon; C E Palmer; V Pariyadath; M P Paulus; W E Pelham; D Pfefferbaum; C Pierpaoli; A Prescot; D Prouty; L I Puttler; N Rajapaske; K M Rapuano; G Reeves; P F Renshaw; M C Riedel; P Rojas; M de la Rosa; M D Rosenberg; M J Ross; M Sanchez; C Schirda; D Schloesser; J Schulenberg; K J Sher; C Sheth; P D Shilling; W K Simmons; E R Sowell; N Speer; M Spittel; L M Squeglia; C Sripada; J Steinberg; C Striley; M T Sutherland; J Tanabe; S F Tapert; W Thompson; R L Tomko; K A Uban; S Vrieze; N E Wade; R Watts; S Weiss; B A Wiens; O D Williams; A Wilbur; D Wing; D Wolff-Hughes; R Yang; D A Yurgelun-Todd; R A Zucker; A Potter; H P Garavan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Eye movements reveal sexually dimorphic deficits in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Angelina Paolozza; Rebecca Munn; Douglas P Munoz; James N Reynolds
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Intrinsic brain networks normalize with treatment in pediatric complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Lino Becerra; Simona Sava; Laura E Simons; Athena M Drosos; Navil Sethna; Charles Berde; Alyssa A Lebel; David Borsook
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  The Contribution of Network Organization and Integration to the Development of Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Scott Marek; Kai Hwang; William Foran; Michael N Hallquist; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Cognitive Control of Saccadic Eye Movements in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Claudia C Gonzalez; Mark Mon-Williams; Siobhan Burke; Melanie R Burke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.