| Literature DB >> 25814922 |
Angelina Paolozza1, Rebecca Munn1, Douglas P Munoz2, James N Reynolds2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the accuracy and characteristics of saccadic eye movements in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) compared with typically developing control children. Previous studies have found that children with FASD produce saccades that are quantifiably different from controls. Additionally, animal studies have found sex-based differences for behavioral effects after prenatal alcohol exposure. Therefore, we hypothesized that eye movement measures will show sexually dimorphic results.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; eye movements; fetal alcohol spectrum disorder; saccade dysmetria; saccades; sexual dimorphism
Year: 2015 PMID: 25814922 PMCID: PMC4356081 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Demographic variables for control and FASD groups.
| Males (%) | 53 (47) | 39 (55) | 0.65 |
| Females (%) | 60 (53) | 32 (45) | 0.38 |
| Fetal alcohol syndrome (%) | – | 8 (11) | |
| Partial fetal alcohol syndrome (%) | – | 14 (20) | |
| Alcohol related neurodevelopmental disorder (%) | – | 49 (69) | |
| Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (%) | – | 43 (61) | |
| Anxiety (%) | – | 9 (13) | |
| Oppositional defiant disorder (%) | – | 7 (10) | |
| Depression (%) | – | 6 (8) | |
| Other (%) | – | 19 (26) | |
| Stimulants (%) | – | 31 (43) | |
| Antipsychotics (%) | – | 17 (24) | |
| Antidepressants (%) | – | 8 (11) | |
| Other (%) | – | 14 (19) | |
| Age (years ± SD) | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 11.7 ± 0.4 | 0.0009 |
| Socioeconomic status | 47 ± 7 | 41 ± 14 | 0.0096 |
| First Nations/Metis (%) | 2 (2) | 43 (61) | <0.0001 |
| Caucasian (%) | 106 (94) | 25 (35) | <0.0001 |
| Other (%) | 5 (4) | 3 (4) | Ns |
The control group had no comorbidities or medications except asthma and requiring an inhaler (n = 3).
Figure 1Main sequence relationships. (A) The velocity-amplitude relationship of a 15-year-old control participant and 15-year-old FASD participant. (B) Data for participants in the FASD group (n = 71) shown in red and the control group (n = 113) shown in blue. The slope of the velocity-amplitude relationship was significantly lower in the FASD group. Control is shown in blue and FASD is shown in red. *p < 0.05.
Sex differences between FASD and controls.
| SRT | 48.7 ± 1 | 51.5 ± 1 | 54.4 ± 3 | 50.1 ± 2 |
| Amplitude | 47.1 ± 1 | 53.1 ± 1 | 49.6 ± 2 | 43.9 ± 2 |
| Endpoint | 51.3 ± 1 | 48.8 ± 1 | 60.9 ± 4 | 49.4 ± 1 |
Indicates significant difference from control females,
indicates significant difference from control males.
Figure 2Overall data. Data are mean ± SEM for participants in the FASD group (n = 71) shown in red and the control group (n = 113) shown in blue. (A) Males with FASD had significantly slower saccadic reaction time (SRT) compared to control males. (B) Control females had significantly greater amplitude compared to control males and females with FASD. (C) Males with FASD had significantly greater endpoint angle of error compared to all other groups. *p < 0.05 compared to group indicated or all other groups.
Sex differences between FASD and control for amplitude restricted dataset.
| Velocity (°/s) | 327±4.9 | 339±4.9 | 327±6.4 | 313±5.2 |
| Amplitude (°) | 9.0±0.04 | 9.2±0.04 | 9.1±0.06 | 9.0±0.06 |
| Duration (ms) | 49.7±0.8 | 48.8±0.5 | 51.2±1.2 | 50.6±0.9 |
| Acceleration (°/s2) | 23,958±551 | 25,527±555 | 23,990±702 | 23,659±646 |
| Deceleration (°/s2) | −19,706±428 | −20,823±430 | −20,082±618 | −19,032±528 |
| Slope 1 | 13.5 ± 0.4 | 14.2 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.4 | 13.4 ± 0.4 |
| Slope 2 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 11.1 ± 0.3 | 10.6 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 0.4 |
| Skew index | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02 |
| SRT | 163.5 ± 5.4 | 167.7 ± 4.5 | 172.7 ± 6.8 | 162.6 ± 6.7 |
| Endpoint (°) | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
Indicates significant difference from control females.
Figure 3Schematic of metric measures. Individual data for each participant are shown in pink for the participants with FASD (n = 71) and light blue for the controls (n = 113). The mean of the FASD group is shown as a bold red line and control group as a bold blue line. Males (control vs. FASD) are on the left and females (control vs. FASD) are on the right. (E) Eye traces of correct saccades when participants look from a central fixation point to a peripheral target. (Ė) Velocity profiles of the control and FASD participants. Peak velocity was significantly slower in the females with FASD compared to control females. (Ë) Acceleration and deceleration profiles of all participants. Peak deceleration, but not acceleration, was significantly slower in the females with FASD compared to control females. *Significant results (p < 0.05) are indicated by black dotted circle.