Literature DB >> 35367223

Neurobehavioral maturation of motor response inhibition in adolescence - A narrative review.

Hannah Weiss1, Monica Luciana2.   

Abstract

Immature motor response inhibition in adolescence is considered contributory to adolescent risk-taking and externalizing behaviors. We review studies reporting age-related variations in motor response inhibition and MRI measurements from typically-developing adolescents. Reviewed studies measured response inhibition using one of three tasks-the Stop Signal Task, Go/No-Go, and Antisaccade Task. Task reliability appears to be particularly strong for the SST. Across tasks and study designs, results indicate that inhibitory control improves markedly through early adolescence. The trajectory of change in later adolescence and into young adulthood (i.e., linear or plateauing) varies depending on the task design. Neuroimaging studies identify adult-like response inhibition networks that are involved in behavioral development. The pros and cons of each task are discussed, including recommendations to guide future studies. Ongoing studies in large longitudinal datasets offer opportunities for further exploration of the shape of change in response inhibition, related neural regions, and associations with other affective and cognitive processes to identify potential impacts of motor response inhibition immaturities or individual differences on adolescent risk-taking behaviors.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action inhibition; Adolescent development; Inhibitory control measurement; Inhibitory control neural activity; Response inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35367223      PMCID: PMC9119966          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   9.052


  192 in total

1.  Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Cristina Massen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-04

2.  Adolescents' performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: implications for the development of decision making and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Catalina J Hooper; Monica Luciana; Heather M Conklin; Rebecca S Yarger
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-11

3.  Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; Todd Hare; B J Casey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Incentives facilitate developmental improvement in inhibitory control by modulating control-related networks.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Charles F Geier; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  D P Munoz; J R Broughton; J E Goldring; I T Armstrong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Trisha Van Zandt; Frederick Verbruggen; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Cortical morphology of the pars opercularis and its relationship to motor-inhibitory performance in a longitudinal, developing cohort.

Authors:  Lauren B Curley; Erik Newman; Wesley K Thompson; Timothy T Brown; Donald J Hagler; Natacha Akshoomoff; Chase Reuter; Anders M Dale; Terry L Jernigan
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Meta-analytic evidence for a joint neural mechanism underlying response inhibition and state anger.

Authors:  Andrei A Puiu; Olga Wudarczyk; Gregor Kohls; Danilo Bzdok; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-11

10.  Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Mike Anderson; Corinne L Reid; Allison M Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.